After four years of deliberation, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced today that meat from cloned animals and their offspring is safe to eat.
Read more in this Wired article.
Image: Matt Batchelder
Profile
Hi there. The purpose of this blog is to write about current and interesting science news that may affect people's lives. I hope you enjoy the posts. The blog was maintained from January 2007 to October 2008.
Science/Medical Writing Jobs!
Medical education company seeks in-house medical writer to join content development team. Tasks include writing, research for new and ongoing programs, reference searches and retrievals, Med-Line searches, communication with faculty, and development of slides in PowerPoint.
Qualifications
Masters, PharmD, PhD or MD, with a medical or bioscience background
Please send resume, writing samples and salary requirements to
job2008@thecustomer.com
Is there a topic you would like me to write about?
Send me your requests here.
Submit your entries for the Science To Life Banner Contest!
Email your entries to sci2life@aol.com or Click here.
Search
Recent Posts
- Last Post
- New web-based scientific tools & sites
- Chronic exposure to estrogen impairs some cognitive functions
- Bio tech brain drain: are too many talented scientists leaving the Southeast?
- The importance of stupidity in scientific research
- New materials for microwave cookware heat faster with less energy
- 6 years, 3 letters-The end of graduate school
- Blogroll Picks
- New research on the molecular basis of SIDS
- Suppression of tumor growth by the BRCA1-associated protein-1"
Recent Comments
- eranga on Nanotechnology & your health
- Fogia on Receive science/medical writing job list (free)
- Jamal Uddin on Nanotechnology & your health
- R.G. San Ramon on Predicting good behavior
- sana on 100 weird facts about the human body
- Flo on Addiction-an HBO documentary
- mychar on Receive science/medical writing job list (free)
- ayesha saeed on Scientists seek test to detect gene doping in athletes
- Hal on The importance of stupidity in scientific research
- Zara on Evidence of water on extra-solar planet
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
Blogroll
- A Blog Around The Clock
- Aetiology
- Afarensis
- Bio Job Blog
- Bio-Typing
- Cognitive Daily
- Counter Minds
- The Gist
- Global Health Policy
- Global Health Report
- The Health Media Watch
- Hope for Pandora
- Live Science Blogs
- Louiza Fitness
- Science Blog
- Science Matter
- Scientific American Blog
- So What Can I Do?
- Special Time Science Blog
- TIME Eye on Science
- WorldChanging
« Patients say yes, yes, yes to "Wiihab" | Main | 100 weird facts about the human body »
FDA: No labels needed on cloned meat products
Category: Food Science
Posted on: February 21, 2008 11:35 AM, by Karen Ventii
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/64731
Comments
How many cloned cows do you think are out there? (the generation of each animal costs in the ball park of $40K) It is not like attack of the clones. Only a very small part of the population will get the honor of consuming one of these noble creatures.
Posted by: Labrat | February 22, 2008 11:44 AM
Thanks for posting a link to the Wired article Karen. Very interesting indeed.
I've been following the cloned meat issue on and off for a couple of years. Since I'm UK based, my concerns in this regard are closer to home as one might well imagine. That said, I sure don't turn a blind eye to overseas related issues such as this.
I have previously been in touch with Lord Peter Melchett, policy director of the Soil Association (UK) about meat cloning issues and make an effort to keep him up to speed as per his request. As such, I'll send him a link to the Wired article - many thanks for the hat tip.
Posted by: McDawg | February 22, 2008 11:45 AM
Fab blog BTW. I hadn't seen this particular Sb before.
Posted by: McDawg | February 22, 2008 11:52 AM
I'm not too happy about eating cloned meat. I really don't see a benefit. If it's so safe and the meat quality is supposedly better wouldn't they WANT to label it as cloned meat?? :) Good article.
Posted by: Tim | February 22, 2008 1:51 PM
In other news, a Korean company is offering to clone dogs.
Coincidence? I think not!
Posted by: Josh | February 23, 2008 1:28 AM
I think there manz cloned cows on the market.I will not try the meet.I think the scientists are plying with the nature.That's not good at all.
Posted by: Nick | February 23, 2008 7:12 AM
Because, first, of the knee-jerk emotional reaction some people have to "cloning", and second, because to the best of my knowledge there is no meaningful scientific basis for differetiating cloned meat from uncloned meat.
Posted by: Azkyroth | February 23, 2008 7:37 AM
A little late for that, don't you think?
Human innovators have been "playing with the nature" for tens of thousands of years, ever since the first development of hand tools. Even if we restrict it to tampering with biology, do you think pomeranians evolved naturally, ffs? What's so special about this way of altering parts of nature to serve our convenience that makes it so much more threatening than all the other ways we've been doing that, other than its "creepiness?"
Posted by: Azkyroth | February 23, 2008 7:40 AM
If we're talking deposited embryos, then carried to term, I would only require the things I normally do from my beef - like grass fed, no antibiotics ( I mean no institutionalized antibiotic regimens, not "don't treat cows that get an infection" ), no hormone regimens. I expect someday there will be factories cloning only the best cuts of meat - in those cases I'd want to be more careful about what was used to treat the cell culture.
I don't see any end-product distinction between a clone and a twin, really.
On the other hand, the 'benefits' of cloned meat are manifold, and the risks have little to do with the safety for human consumption. Imagine that you could buy exactly the same steak - you know, that ribeye that you bought two superbowls ago that was insanely good, better than anything before or since. Imagine that a farmer can have 50 of that cow that had the perfect fat to meat distribution, and produced those steaks.
On the other hand, if it's like other technological advances, it would supplant more traditional processes; and if you think it's dangerous to the survival of the food supply to have a single species of grain supplying all of our food, imagine when the bulk of our meat comes from, say, four or five patented individual genotypes. A bovine disease could wipe out the entire technological food chain in weeks, and leave no survivors.
I'm all about appropriate technology. Clone away, but keep an eye on that logistics chain, ok?
Posted by: Steve | February 23, 2008 10:29 AM
I believe that's the first rational concern about cloned meat I've ever heard. This could be a problem, yes; any thoughts on how to mitigate it?
Posted by: Azkyroth | February 23, 2008 8:54 PM
Gross violation of the dignity of cow life. Ethically, morally, humanely wrong for about 20 years.
Posted by: Dveduu | February 24, 2008 12:31 AM
I don't mind meat that's been cloned.
I don't want meat that's been tortured.
Posted by: dzho | February 24, 2008 6:57 PM
Because, first, of the knee-jerk emotional reaction some people have to "cloning", and second, because to the best of my knowledge there is no meaningful scientific basis for differetiating cloned meat from uncloned meat.
Posted by: Azkyroth | February 23, 2008 7:37 AM
I have the knee jerk reaction. What concerns me is the fact that many times side effects and unforeseen consequences don't show up for years into the future. But with the growing population we may not have any choice!
Dave Briggs :~)
Posted by: Dave Briggs | February 27, 2008 11:34 AM