Hi there. I am a science/ medical writer based in Atlanta GA with a Ph.D. in cancer biochemistry from Emory University. The purpose of this blog is to write about current and interesting science news that may affect people's lives. I hope you enjoy my posts.
Submit your entries for the Science To Life Banner Contest!
Email your entries to sci2life@aol.com or Nicholas Carr set out to explore how the ubiquity of text on the Internet is affecting our brains, after realizing that his increased Internet use may be affecting his ability to concentrate on reading long, detailed texts. His essay is published in the July/August issue of The Atlantic
"Over the past few years I've had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain," he says. "The deep reading that use to come naturally has become a struggle."
| | As the Internet becomes a universal conduit for most of the information that flows through our eyes and ears, it seems to be chipping away at our capacity for concentration and contemplation. While we still await the long-term neurological and psychological experiments that will provide a definitive picture of how Internet use affects cognition, a recently published study of online research habits, conducted by scholars from University College London, suggests that we may well be in the midst of a sea change in the way we read and think. |
Read the full article.
Comments
He may be on to something. I've found that over the years I've less stomach for the pretentiousness of the Atlantic. Maybe I'm getting dumber. Or maybe not.
Posted by: Matt Platte | June 23, 2008 12:04 PM
This reminded me something a read a couple years ago; here is the link:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/ptech/12/30/byrne.powerpoint.ap/
I guess it is a matter of "things you own, end up owning you" kind of thing. (special thanks to fight club!)
Posted by: Betul Kacar | June 23, 2008 3:16 PM
Thank you both for the comments. Great article Betul.
Posted by: Karen Ventii | June 23, 2008 3:59 PM
Yet he expects people to read his article. And wastes the first page on anecdotes, which he admits "don't prove much." Seems to me if he believes his own argument he'd pack the front with what facts he has - it wouldn't have taken much. As someone who reads blogs a lot, and still can get through 800 pages in a day (if that day is Saturday), I don't buy his argument. Maybe there's something to it, but I'd say it's habit and believing we can "multitask" - and that that's a good thing - more than "rewiring".
Posted by: The Ridger | June 23, 2008 7:12 PM
That is a good point! To add, I don't think it matters how we get the knowledge, or where we get it from nor debate about if those ways are making us dumb. Frankly, when I spend 5 hours in the library while my head is buried in the books and bookshelves, I don't feel any smarter either.
Posted by: Betul Kacar | June 24, 2008 9:40 AM
Offtopic
Karen, I realized that I learned the word 'ubiquitin' before a word 'ubiquity'. :)
Posted by: Zhanetta Astakhova | July 12, 2008 1:13 AM
Hi Zhanetta,
Since I work on the ubiquitin protein, I must say that I'm quite happy about your statement :)
Posted by: Karen Ventii | July 13, 2008 2:13 PM