I just caught my first piece of plagiarism. On a throw-away 10 point assignment that required students to write only 2 sentences. That the student in question copied directly from Wikipedia. How dare they!
Sciencewomen
A scientist and an engineer being the change we want to see
Profiles
Alice Pawley is an assistant professor of engineering education at Purdue University. She blogs at the intersection of women's studies and engineering, a pretty empty space but with potential to grow. She wants to be a feminist-but-tenured professor when she grows up.
SciWo is an assistant professor of geosciences. She blogs about the intersection of science and real life - primarily based on her first-hand experiences. Her older posts can be found here.
Sb/DonorsChoose Drive
Read our kickoff post.
Thanks!
Recent Comments
- Lab Lemming on What would you do?
- ecogeofemme on What I'm working on
- SciWo on What would you do?
- John McKay on What would you do?
- Who, me? on What would you do?
- TAC on What would you do?
- scatterplot on What would you do?
- Snooky on What would you do?
- SciWo on SciWo's Storytime: Sally and the Purple Socks
- Heather on What would you do?
Recent Posts
- What I'm working on
- What would you do?
- SciWo's Storytime: Sally and the Purple Socks
- Blogger guilt
- DonorsChoose wrap up
- SciWo's Storytime: Pumpkins
- Math literacy is so important, but don't take my word for it.
- Donors Choose: Reach $1750+ or 10+ more donors and Alice will donate 10% on top!
- SciWo's Storytime: Bugs
- DonorsChoose reminder: Incentives to give more by Sunday
Search
Ask Sciencewomen
- Not giving up this "silly science stuff" just because I am going to have a baby
- What are your work hours? Can I be a professor part time?
- Part-time post-docs
- Do you give a gift to your advisor when you defend?
- Blogging on grad school decision-making
- Optimizing publications for a PhD student
- Negotiating "beer with the guys" on a job interview
Manifestos
- Science Woman's revolution looks like this
- Yes, but what does Alice *do*?
- The personal is political, and so Alice blogs as herself
Teaching-related quandries
Grant Newbie
Academia Schmacademia
- What are you good at? Part I Part II
- On spring break, real faculty work at home
- Wanted: "Culture of collegiality"
- Negotiating the "illegal questions" on an academic job interview
- Little Red Hens find their own peer mentors
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
« December's goals: finishing up, getting ahead, and finding peace | Main | Girls sweep science competition. Aren't you tired of these headlines? »
Aw, damn.
Category: teaching
Posted on: December 5, 2007 11:17 AM, by SciWo
Find more posts in: 
Education & Careers
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/57531
Comments
Aargh!
I suppose the positive side of this is since it's not a huge assignment, you can use this as a "teaching opportunity" to explain to them the seriousness of plagiarism.
Unfortunately if Mystery U is like pretty much any other college out there, this will be the first of many....
Posted by: Dave Munger | December 5, 2007 11:34 AM
maybe they wrote the wikipedia entry? not likely, but possible. can you determine who wrote the wiki entry at all? not sure about that.
Posted by: bruin | December 5, 2007 11:42 AM
Idiocy squared. First, to risk one's grade in a course on such an unimportant assignment. It would have been far, far better to take a '0' on the assignment. Second, to rely on a source so accessible that the plagiarism could be easily detected. If it's any consolation, I'm waiting to hear back from the Dean of Students' office on the status of charges I brought against a student who lifted substantial portions of text from four different web sites and inserted it into two different reading logs submitted a week apart. She is also charged with plagiarizing in another course, so it is very likely that she will be 'sent down' for a semester.
Posted by: Elf Eye | December 5, 2007 12:14 PM
All too common, I'm afraid. It's often remarkable how stupid the plagiarism is (of course, there's also the explanation that clever plagiarism is unlikely to be caught). I see two main reasons: (1) It's the bad students who are more likely to cheat -- the good students can just complete the assignment; (2) plagiarism is often a last-minute act of desperation when the student doesn't think s/he will be able to successfully complete the assignment.
I try to put the fear of god in them early on so they won't even consider it (not that I always succeed), and then I hit them hard when I catch them. I tell them up front that plagiarism means failing the class, and if I have my way they'll be expelled. I figure we probably only catch a fraction of the cheaters, so it's more important to make the penalty harsh. We don't want them to think that a cost-benefit analysis supports plagiarism. (my 2 cents)
Posted by: Physicalist | December 5, 2007 12:45 PM
@ bruin: There was a Foxtrot comic on that theme a while back. The short answer though, is that we don't need to worry about this possibility: First, it's so unlikely, that the student would have to provide compelling evidence for having authored the web entry; the professor's default conclusion has to be plagiarism. Second, even if one has published one's work previously, one still needs to reference that earlier work when it is reproduced. (When I was younger, I had a prof. warn me against "plagiarizing myself.")
Posted by: Physicalist | December 5, 2007 12:52 PM
I gotta go with dave's comment above. I'd demonstrate how you found out about it and what it means. Sadly, I wouldn't be surprised if a portion of your class didn't know what plagarism actually is.
Posted by: drue | December 5, 2007 1:02 PM
I had exactly the same thing happen a few weeks ago. I don't check every test for plagiarism, but this one had terms and grammar that were just too good for a student in my class to have produced. So I typed in most of one sentence and blammo, the Google hit came back right off the bat.
If the student copies from a good source (in this case the wiki entry was good) you can tell right away, IMHO.
Posted by: boojieboy | December 5, 2007 1:08 PM
I think that most plagiarism is done innocently... in my experience teaching a high-level tier II writing course (it was comparative anatomy... don't ask me why the uni turned it into a writing course) students who plagiarized had no idea that they had plagiarized. They were genuinely shocked and horrified when I called them on it, even though I was always very explicit about what constitutes plagiarism and gave them lots of examples. I'd still get a few every semester. I usually just gave them a zero for the assignment and explained to them that I *could* take it to the dean, as plagiarism is grounds for expulsion... never took it that far, though.
Posted by: LM | December 5, 2007 1:57 PM
I'm curious how you knew it was plagiarism. Do you randomly check for these things?
Posted by: Jennie | December 5, 2007 3:55 PM
I dunno, Drue, as a recent undergraduate myself, I think you'd have a hard time finding a student who didn't know that copying directly from a source without citing is plagiarism. A lot of students seem to not know that paraphrasing without a cite is also considered plagiarism, but copying directly? They teach you about that in high school.
Posted by: Kathryn | December 5, 2007 4:32 PM
I'm with Kathryn; I don't buy the explanation that college students don't know that copying directly from a source without citing is plagiarism. There are other forms of plagiarism that may be less obvious to students, but this is a pretty cut and dry case.
As for how I knew it was plagiarism. The sentence contained a statement I wasn't sure was completely true, so I went to wikipedia...and found the sentence. Then I checked the other sentence, and it was in the relevant article as well. So no, I haven't been routinely checking for plagiarism (though I did try to design my assignments to make it more difficult), but I do routinely correct any science that seems to be questionable.
Posted by: ScienceWoman | December 5, 2007 5:01 PM
You and me both! I just came across two EXTREMELY well written papers by two exceedingly lazy students, again for a 10 point extra credit paper. The time I'm spending dealing with this, at the expense of writing my final exam, is completely irritating.
Posted by: another female -ologist | December 6, 2007 10:09 AM