Noted the other day when Minnow was puzzling. It's a good thing she can't read yet.
Sciencewomen
A scientist and an engineer being the change we want to see
Profiles
Alice Pawley is an assistant professor of engineering education at Purdue University. She blogs at the intersection of women's studies and engineering, a pretty empty space but with potential to grow. She wants to be a feminist-but-tenured professor when she grows up.
SciWo is an assistant professor of geosciences. She blogs about the intersection of science and real life - primarily based on her first-hand experiences. Her older posts can be found here.
Recent Comments
- Christina Pikas on SciWo's Storytime: Little Squirt the Fire Truck
- Art on SciWo's Storytime: Little Squirt the Fire Truck
- femalePhD on Ask sciencewomen: If I'm happy with an MS, should I get a PhD?
- Amelie on Tips from the top: Mentoring is really, super important to help people succeed.
- Anonymous on Tips from the top: Mentoring is really, super important to help people succeed.
- Emeritus on What would you do?
- Anonymous on Ask sciencewomen: If I'm happy with an MS, should I get a PhD?
- Katherine on Teaching Quandry: Offering make-up labs and field trips?
- Anonymous on Tips from the top: Mentoring is really, super important to help people succeed.
- Joe on Ask sciencewomen: If I'm happy with an MS, should I get a PhD?
Recent Posts
- SciWo's Storytime: Little Squirt the Fire Truck
- Tips from the top: Mentoring is really, super important to help people succeed.
- Hi. I'm boring. (But there's a beautiful necklace at the end.)
- SciWo's Storytime: Knuffle Bunny!
- Ask sciencewomen: If I'm happy with an MS, should I get a PhD?
- What I'm working on
- What would you do?
- SciWo's Storytime: Sally and the Purple Socks
- Blogger guilt
- DonorsChoose wrap up
Search
Ask Sciencewomen
- Not giving up this "silly science stuff" just because I am going to have a baby
- What are your work hours? Can I be a professor part time?
- Part-time post-docs
- Do you give a gift to your advisor when you defend?
- Blogging on grad school decision-making
- Optimizing publications for a PhD student
- Negotiating "beer with the guys" on a job interview
Manifestos
- Science Woman's revolution looks like this
- Yes, but what does Alice *do*?
- The personal is political, and so Alice blogs as herself
Teaching-related quandries
Grant Newbie
Academia Schmacademia
- What are you good at? Part I Part II
- On spring break, real faculty work at home
- Wanted: "Culture of collegiality"
- Negotiating the "illegal questions" on an academic job interview
- Little Red Hens find their own peer mentors
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
« There's a reason I called it Utopia | Main | Isle Royale Travelogue Day 3: Rock Harbour to Mt. Franklin »
What's wrong with this picture?
Category: basic concepts
Posted on: June 13, 2008 7:43 AM, by SciWo
Find more posts in: 
Education & Careers
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/73969
Comments
That "octagon" was obviously designed by the same toy designer who did the six-legged stuffed "octopus" that we've seen at other ScienceBlogs.
Posted by: chezjake | June 13, 2008 8:04 AM
you should send it to the FAIL blog...
Posted by: hypoglycemiagirl | June 13, 2008 8:27 AM
Six-sided Octagon does tend to substantiate the dyslexia theory.
Posted by: B Capp | June 13, 2008 8:36 AM
Bwahahahahahahahaha!
(We had a puzzle almost exactly like it, except without the words, and with a pentagon instead of the star. It felt a little weird using words like "hexagon" with a child whose vocabulary consisted of "no" and "ball.")
Posted by: Kim | June 13, 2008 9:06 AM
For some reason, I find myself slightly disturbed by how quickly I spotted the mistake...
Posted by: Epicanis | June 13, 2008 11:58 AM
I just hope they didn't do it because they were afraid that "Hex" would imply the occult...
Posted by: Lab Lemming | June 13, 2008 5:48 PM
ditto hypoglycemiagirl, FAIL entry for sure
Posted by: DrugMonkey | June 13, 2008 8:42 PM
Clearly I am in the same class as the maker of this toy. I couldn't see what was wrong with it until I read the comments. Doh! (Well in my defense it is early on a Saturday morning....;-)
Posted by: Propter Doc | June 14, 2008 4:49 AM
Oh, my. Luckily, by the time she can read octagon, she will likely be moving on to more fun toys...or books. :)
Posted by: unbalanced reaction | June 14, 2008 10:13 PM
Geometry FAIL. Definitely belongs on failblog!
Posted by: themadlolscientist | June 15, 2008 12:34 PM
Instead of being glad the kid can't read, why not just get some paint or some tacky paper and a permanent marker and fix the error, then you don't have to worry about creating an associative connection between the shape and the wrong word?
Posted by: SophieHirschfeld | June 16, 2008 10:47 PM
Whoever made the toy must have failed geometry badly. :)
Posted by: IBY | June 17, 2008 1:09 AM