Now on ScienceBlogs: The Lights Stay On Inside a Black Hole!

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination
   

The Scientific Activist

Please, Please, No More Rick Perry

This won't be news to anyone from Texas, but our governor, Republican Rick Perry, is a walking disaster. From The Dallas Morning News: SAN ANTONIO - Gov. Rick Perry, after a God and country sermon attended by dozens of political...

       

Search This Blog

This Blog and the Old Site



Pass It Along





submit to
reddit

The Scientific Activist

Profile

scientificactivistprofile.gif A postdoc by day and a scientific activist by night, Nick Anthis isn't letting his research in protein structure and function get in the way of defending scientific and social progress.

Subscribe via Email or RSS

Email Stay up to date on the latest from The Scientific Activist by email.

RSS See updates in real time with my RSS feed.

Recent Posts

Top Posts

Twitter

Other Stuff

Nick Anthis's Profile
Nick Anthis's Facebook profile





Add The Scientific Activist to your Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!


« Another Reason to Vote Democratic | Main | My Election Day Message »

Please, Please, No More Rick Perry

Category: Republican PartyTexaselectionsreligion
Posted on: November 6, 2006 6:40 PM, by Nick Anthis

This won't be news to anyone from Texas, but our governor, Republican Rick Perry, is a walking disaster. From The Dallas Morning News:

SAN ANTONIO - Gov. Rick Perry, after a God and country sermon attended by dozens of political candidates Sunday, said that he agreed with the minister that non-Christians will be condemned to hell....

"If you live your life and don't confess your sins to God almighty through the authority of Christ and his blood, I'm going to say this very plainly, you're going straight to hell with a nonstop ticket," Mr. Hagee said during a service interspersed with religious and patriotic videos.

Asked afterward at a political rally whether he agreed with Mr. Hagee, the governor said he didn't hear anything that he would take exception to.

He said that he believes in the inerrancy of the Bible and that those who don't accept Jesus as their savior will go to hell.

Fortunately, there is (some) hope, with all of the other three main candidates in the race criticizing Perry. And, as usual, flamboyant Independent candidate, Kinky Friedman, doesn't disappoint:

"He doesn't think very differently from the Taliban, does he?" independent Kinky Friedman said.

Mr. Friedman, a Jew, said Mr. Perry's comment "hits pretty close to home."

"Being obsessed with who's going to heaven and who's going to hell is kind of a pathetic waste of time," he said.

Things aren't looking particularly good for Kinky or Democrat Chris Bell, the only two people in the race actually qualified to govern the state, but I'll keep hoping until the bitter end. Now, fellow Texans, get out and vote!

Sphere: Related Content

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

I can't help but feel it's a bit ironic to describe Kinky Friedman as 'qualified to run the state'. I'm not entirely sure he's qualified to run a Dairy Queen.

But I'll vote for him tomorrow anyway. :-)

Posted by: Scott Simmons | November 6, 2006 11:07 PM

2

Ironic, yes, but probably still true, all else considered.

Posted by: Nick Anthis | November 7, 2006 4:20 AM

3

Kinky is qualified? The man supports "teaching the controversy" and prayer in public schools (at least, I've never heard him disavow his earlier statements). Wasn't one religious nutcase bad enough? I'd have hoped people would vote early, as (at least in my county) the vote is on a paper ballot, which is a little harder to screw up intentionally. Unfortunately, it probably won't be necessary for them to frak up the election, especially if the talibangelists decide to vote.

About the only good news is that people at work were at least talking of the other candidates, and a few Republicans were not voting for Perry.

Posted by: Badger3k | November 7, 2006 5:46 AM

4

I haven't seen any statements from Kinky about supporting "teaching the controversy", but if they exist that would be disheartening. Is this documented anywhere?

Posted by: Nick Anthis | November 7, 2006 7:44 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM