Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks
   

The Scientific Activist

New Attack Ad Sets Dangerous Precedent

How liable are we for the things we don't write on our blogs?

       

Search This Blog

This Blog and the Old Site



Pass It Along





submit to
reddit

The Scientific Activist

Profile

scientificactivistprofile.gif A postdoc by day and a scientific activist by night, Nick Anthis isn't letting his research in protein structure and function get in the way of defending scientific and social progress.

Subscribe via Email or RSS

Email Stay up to date on the latest from The Scientific Activist by email.

RSS See updates in real time with my RSS feed.

Recent Posts

Top Posts

Twitter

Other Stuff

Nick Anthis's Profile
Nick Anthis's Facebook profile



« House and Senate to Vote on Children's Health Insurance Expansion Despite Veto Threat | Main | Fundraising Scam Not Enough to Keep NRCC in the Black »

New Attack Ad Sets Dangerous Precedent

Category: Republican Partyblogosphereelections
Posted on: September 22, 2007 1:27 PM, by Nick Anthis

Political campaigning can be a cynical business, but this takes things to a whole new level. Check out this ad by Republican Timothy Hugo of the Virginia House of Delegates. The ad quotes "others" as saying that Democrat Rex Simmons ran "the most cowardly campaign I have ever seen.... Rex was spreading lies..... Rex has been lying to voters the entire campaign." But, that's not the shocking part.

In the ad, the only source given for this is "www.raisingkaine.com", the progressive political blog Raising Kaine. The issue, though, is that none of those comments ever appeared on www.raisingkaine.com. Instead, they were buried deep in the site on an entry in a pseudonymous diary. This entry was not written by one of the blog's organizers, and it never appeared on the homepage. And, of course, these quotes were taken completely out of context. (To be fair, though, this is a little different than Hugo having quoted a commenter on a blog post--as the Washington Post implied in its coverage--although it's not far from it).

This ad is incredibly misleading and unethical, and if it is allowed to continue to run, it raises a dangerous precedent. If this is acceptable political behavior, then what would stop a candidate from quoting some anonymous commenter on The Scientific Activist and attributing what he or she wrote to me... even if this commenter wrote exactly the opposite of what I had written?

Nothing, as far as I can tell.

For more on the story, check out these entries from Raising Kaine.

Sphere: Related Content

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

Comments

1

OK--I am going to run for President based on a quote from this blog--namely from this very comment: what if I said here that 'Nick is a poopy-head'? You said it, Nick. Nick is a poopy-head. There has to be a Supreme Court ruling eventually to strike down any such claim, with triple damages at the very least. The real problem is that legal opinion hardly moves at internet speed, and I doubt that it ever can catch up with current events. There are lawyers on the other side making mischief, and I wonder whether those on the side of the angels will have the resources to fight back effectively and in a timely manner.

Posted by: VJB | September 22, 2007 9:07 PM

2

With so many good comments to choose from--especially lately--, how will the opposition know what to attribute to you in their attack ads?

Posted by: Meredith M. Clancy | September 24, 2007 8:52 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.