Recently, I wrote about how raising the specter of "Darwinism" as a reason for people's lack of acceptance of evolution is totally irrelevant. But, Faith in Honest Doubt now has a much more entertaining (and quantitative) metaphorical smack down of the idea. Check it out.
The Scientific Activist
Metaphorical Smack Down of the "Cult of Darwinism" Argument
Check it out at Faith in Honest Doubt
Search This Blog
This Blog and the Old Site
Pass It Along
The Scientific Activist
As featured in:
Hot tip or story idea? Let me know!
Scientific Activist - 1,
Bush Administration - 0
Advancing Science through Conversations: Bridging the Gap between Blogs and the Academy
Profile
A postdoc by day and a scientific activist by night, Nick Anthis isn't letting his research in protein structure and function get in the way of defending scientific and social progress.
Subscribe via Email or RSS
Stay up to date on the latest from The Scientific Activist by email.
See updates in real time with my RSS feed.
Recent Posts
- Rhodes Secretary: Wall Street Megabonuses Draining Our Young Talent
- On Mimicking Phosphotyrosine
- AMA Advocates Change in Marijuana Classification
- Two New Papers on Integrin Activation
- New Interactive 3D Molecular Images in Scientific Articles
- Health Care Reform: It's a Matter of Convenience
- 2009 Nobel Prize in Chemistry: The Ribosome
- Bad Math at The Weather Channel
- 2009 Nobel Prize in Medicine: Telomeres and Telomerase
- Scientific Diplomacy and the Universality of Science
Top Posts
Other Stuff
« Biotechs Actively Impeding Transgenic Crop Research | Main | President Obama Begins to Reverse Bush Era Political Interference in Science »
Metaphorical Smack Down of the "Cult of Darwinism" Argument
Category: evolution • philosophy of science
Posted on: February 22, 2009 4:43 PM, by Nick Anthis
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More







Comments
I appreciate the link!
Posted by: Dale | February 25, 2009 4:01 PM
Darwin you say, how about biotechnology being used to alter human consciousness and remote viewing of what a person can see. Scientists have proven they can do this, I am the proof, but don't expect to see it written in a medical journal anytime soon, because they forgot to ask for consent and they didn't tell me either.
Posted by: totalresearch40 | March 9, 2009 7:16 PM