Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks
   

The Scientific Activist

Arlen Specter Leaves GOP for Dems

Specter: "the Republican Party has moved far to the right"

       

Search This Blog

This Blog and the Old Site



Pass It Along





submit to
reddit

The Scientific Activist

Profile

scientificactivistprofile.gif A postdoc by day and a scientific activist by night, Nick Anthis isn't letting his research in protein structure and function get in the way of defending scientific and social progress.

Subscribe via Email or RSS

Email Stay up to date on the latest from The Scientific Activist by email.

RSS See updates in real time with my RSS feed.

Recent Posts

Top Posts

Twitter

Other Stuff

Nick Anthis's Profile
Nick Anthis's Facebook profile



« Help Andy Revkin Annotate Obama's NAS Speech | Main | Report Calls for Stricter Regulation of Medical Conflicts of Interest »

Arlen Specter Leaves GOP for Dems

Category: Democratic PartyRepublican PartyWashington
Posted on: April 28, 2009 1:22 PM, by Nick Anthis

The Republican party today moved another step closer to becoming just the regional party of the South by losing one of its most respected members, Senator Arlen Specter (PA). Citing the Republicans' notable swing to the right in recent years, Specter announced earlier that he would be switching parties to join the Democrats. His switch will give the Democrats a filibuster-proof 60-vote supermajority in the Senate, assuming the courts uphold Al Franken's victory in the Minnesota Senate race.

Without a doubt, this is a positive development. Fears that the Democrats will have "too much power" are overblown, as Specter will certainly continue to be an independent voice in the Democratic Party as he was in the Republican Party. More importantly, since Obama's inauguration, the GOP has done little else besides engage in obstructionist tactics, while offering few if any solutions of their own. This move, then, should at the very least help make Congress more productive.

You can read Specter's full remarks here, but here's a taste:

Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the Republican Party has moved far to the right. Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their registration to become Democrats. I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans.

When I supported the stimulus package, I knew that it would not be popular with the Republican Party. But, I saw the stimulus as necessary to lessen the risk of a far more serious recession than we are now experiencing.

Since then, I have traveled the State, talked to Republican leaders and office-holders and my supporters and I have carefully examined public opinion. It has become clear to me that the stimulus vote caused a schism which makes our differences irreconcilable. On this state of the record, I am unwilling to have my twenty-nine year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate. I have not represented the Republican Party. I have represented the people of Pennsylvania.

Sphere: Related Content

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

Comments

1

Republicans have managed to PUSH the Senator to the other sides. If they don't watch it, they'll push Maine's two Senators over, too. OsiSpeaks.com

Posted by: KYJurisDoctor | April 28, 2009 1:45 PM

2

If it won't be an amicable split, at least it will be dignified. On Specter's part, if not the GOP's.

Posted by: becca | April 28, 2009 3:22 PM

3
Fears that the Democrats will have "too much power" are overblown
Personally, I don't think fears that any politicians have too much power are ever overblown. Consider how much effort goes into fighting things as obscure as the Texas Board of Education. I think you'd agree with me that a certain fundamentalist dentist from Bryan has too much power.


However, I assume you are referring to the marginal difference from Spector's switch, in which case I mostly agree.

Posted by: Jim Hu | April 28, 2009 3:50 PM

4

There needs to be an opposition party. But it doesn't need to be a wingnut party. Perhaps everyone should leave the GOP except the religious right, making the Democratic Party so big that it splits in two. We can have a 30% left Democratic Party, a 30% conservative Democratic Party (Blue Dog Party?), and a 20% wingnut GOP. Which eventually withers away.

Posted by: Russell | April 28, 2009 4:00 PM

5
However, I assume you are referring to the marginal difference from Specter's switch, in which case I mostly agree.

Yes, that's right. And, I agree with your premise that we have to constantly hold our leaders accountable and not let anyone consolidate too much power. However, I'm not too worried about the Democrats in general right, now given how effectively internal disagreements and fault lines seem to mitigate their power.

Posted by: Nick Anthis | April 28, 2009 4:15 PM

6

Having inflicted W on the world it's only fitting that the GOP is consigned to history.

Posted by: Fair Trade | April 28, 2009 9:37 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.