Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks
   

The Scientific Activist

NIH Announces New Embryonic Stem Cell Research Guidelines

The new guidelines are much more reasonable than those of the Bush Administration, but are still overly restrictive.

       

Search This Blog

This Blog and the Old Site



Pass It Along





submit to
reddit

The Scientific Activist

Profile

scientificactivistprofile.gif A postdoc by day and a scientific activist by night, Nick Anthis isn't letting his research in protein structure and function get in the way of defending scientific and social progress.

Subscribe via Email or RSS

Email Stay up to date on the latest from The Scientific Activist by email.

RSS See updates in real time with my RSS feed.

Recent Posts

Top Posts

Twitter

Other Stuff

Nick Anthis's Profile
Nick Anthis's Facebook profile



« Measles: Not a Trivial Illness | Main | Blinded by Legalese »

NIH Announces New Embryonic Stem Cell Research Guidelines

Category: Obama AdministrationWashingtonfunding of sciencescience policystem cells
Posted on: April 17, 2009 2:15 PM, by Nick Anthis

A month after the Obama Administration lifted Bush era restrictions on federal funding for human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research, the NIH has now announced its new draft guidelines for such research. The new guidelines will greatly expand the scope of federally-funded research by allowing funds to be used for work on stem cell lines derived from excess fertility clinic embryos.

However, federal funds will not be available for work on hESC lines derived from embryos that have been generated specifically for the purpose of stem cell work. This is a pretty severe limitation, actually, and the rules basically ensure that if a cell line was derived from an embryo that was not left over from a fertility clinic, work on that cell line can never be funded by federal dollars. Ever.

(The actual derivation of an embryonic stem cell line also cannot be funded with federal dollars, regardless of the source of the embryo, but that is due to an act of Congress and has nothing to do with these NIH guidelines.)

So, it appears that the NIH, under Obama, will retain the same basic framework with respect to hESCs used within the Bush Administration, but will expand the number of lines eligible for funding substantially. It's unfortunate, though, that the Administration has chosen to restrict federally-funded research in such a way, as the ability to generate specific hESC lines will be very important--likely essential--for therapeutic cloning to be possible and even just for scientists to be able to use hESCs for the study of a wide variety of diseases.

Despite all of that, this is still a significant step forward.


Note: these are "draft" guidelines, and there will be a 30-day period during which public comments will be accepted before the guidelines are finalized:

COMMENTS: The NIH welcomes public comment on the draft Guidelines. Comments must be submitted within 30 days of publication of the Guidelines in the Federal Register. The Guidelines are expected to be published in the Federal Register by April 24th. Comments may be mailed to: NIH Stem Cell Guidelines, MSC 7997, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892-7997. At the time of publication in the Federal Register, the NIH will make available a URL where comments may be submitted electronically. In submitting comments, please note that comments will be made publicly available, including any personally identifiable or confidential business information they contain.

Sphere: Related Content

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: PoliticsMedicine & Health

Comments

1

While I have no idea if the Obama Administration is interested in lifting the ban on funding for research on research-derived hESCs, the ban is one of federal law (the Dickey-Wicker Amendment). In other words, it couldn't be nullified by executive order, but would require an act of Congress.

Posted by: David Bruggeman | April 22, 2009 9:27 PM

2

Actually, as far as I know, the Dickey-Wicker Amendment only covers the actual derivation of hESCs, but it does not effect the funding of research on a hESC line once it has been created.

Posted by: Nick Anthis | April 25, 2009 9:54 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.