Now on ScienceBlogs: A study that oversells massage therapy

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Page 3.14

Marrying the line to the curve.

Profile

erinwes.jpg Maintained by the ScienceBlogs Overlords, Page 3.14 points you in the direction of some of ScienceBlogs' finest offerings, plus the tastiest tidbits of science news and opinion from around the web.

Search

Overlord Brain Food

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Other Good Stuff

MEMBER, ORDER OF THE SCIENCE SCOUTS OF EXEMPLARY REPUTE AND ABOVE AVERAGE PHYSIQUE



Add ScienceBlogs to your Technorati favorites:



Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

« Test Tube Future | Main | Saving Coral »

Ask A ScienceBlogger (Round Two): the Results are In!

Category: Ask a ScienceBloggerScienceBlogs
Posted on: May 17, 2006 4:40 PM, by Book Club

For this week, ScienceBlogs editorial asked its cabal of bloggers to answer, if the spirit moved them, the following question:

Will the 'human' race be around in 100 years?

More consensus this week than last -- but that is the nature of a yes/no question. Luckily, there was some fine exposition along the way.

The good news: at least 7 out of 10 ScienceBloggers expect humanity as such to endure for at least ten more fun-filled decades.

Their answers, glossed and linked, below the fold.

At Cognitive Daily, the Mungers answer: yes, but.... In 100 or, more likely, 1000 years, advances in robotics, and/or progress towards radically extending longevity could challenge the definition of 'humanity' past its breaking point.

Tara Smith of Aetoilogy doesn't hesistate to say YES. "We may not be as hardy as cockroaches," she writes, "but we're adaptive as hell."

Orac at Respectful Insolence offers one word only. (Hint: it's not "plastics.")

At Adventures in Ethics and Science, Janet Stemwedel gets all philosophical and says, it depends what you mean by 'humanity.'

RPM of Evolgen flips a Cartesian answer, while

GrrlScientist at Living the Scientific Life thinks that an answer in the negative is more likely given a longer timeframe.

Tim Lambert at Deltoid also says yes, and waxes skeptical about the singularity.

Chad Orzel of Uncertain Principles believes that "we'll continue to muddle along more or less as usual."

PZ Myers writes on Pharyngula that the only real question is what kind of shape we'll be in.

Razib from Gene Expression, who proposed the question, had a three-part answer all ready to go. According to him, in the next century we'll either transcend our humanity via technological innovation, or revert to pre-modern conditions. And which of those alternatives is more likely? He says it's anyone's guess.


Last week's Ask A ScienceBlogger roundup is here.

Last week's version also got linked on kottke.org yesterday (thanks, Kottke!), and inspired this post on Deep-Sea News.

And remember, if you have a question you'd like to Ask A ScienceBlogger, send it to askablogger@seedmediagroup.com.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/6132

  • My Puny Science Blog List from ThePublishingSpot
    As my Stephen DarkSyde interview concludes, I need to introduce you to the Science Blog community. They were founded by Seed Media, the company that publishes this great magazine and this weekly blog roundup that dwarfs my puny list.Ed Brayton... Read More
    Tracked on May 19, 2006 12:49 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.