Seed Media Group

Page 3.14

The Best of ScienceBlogs, and Beyond

Search this blog

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

Profile

old_neuron.jpg Maintained by Seed's editors, web editors, and the other people who make Seed tick, Page 3.14 points you in the direction of some of ScienceBlogs' finest offerings, plus the tastiest tidbits of science news and opinion from around the web.

Other Good Stuff

MEMBER, ORDER OF THE SCIENCE SCOUTS OF EXEMPLARY REPUTE AND ABOVE AVERAGE PHYSIQUE



Add ScienceBlogs to your Technorati favorites:



Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

« Quick Picks on ScienceBlogs, December 28th, 2006 | Main | Quick Picks on ScienceBlogs, January 2nd, 2007 »

Quick Picks on ScienceBlogs, December 29th, 2006

Category: Announcement
Posted on: December 29, 2006 1:00 PM, by Sarah Dasher

There's a high probability you'll learn something.

From Evolution Blog, not to be mistaken for evolgen, A Probability Puzzle.
"A shopkeeper says she has two new baby beagles to show you, but she doesn't know whether they're both male, both female, or one of each. You tell her that you want only a male, and she telephones the fellow who's giving them a bath. 'Is at least one a male?' she asks him. She receives a reply. 'Yes!' she informs you with a smile. What is the probability that the other one is a male?"

From evolgen, not to be mistaken for Evolution Blog, Chance, Stochasticity, Probability, and Evolution.
"Oftentimes, people conflate randomness with a uniform distribution -- equal probabilities of all possible outcomes. But when we model a random process, we assume some distribution that approximates the randomness of the natural event we'd like to simulate."

From Developing Intelligence, A Benefit of Ignorance.
"If subjects are asked to name the ink color of a color word, they are slower to do so for incongruent than congruent and neutral stimuli (e.g., GREEN is slower than GREEN and HOUSE). This is known as the Stroop interference effect. However, this difference disappears if these stimuli are presented at locations subject to IOR (i.e., they were cued more than 300 ms ago). Why should this be the case?"

From Effect Measure, Dead Bodies Don't Cause Disease.
"The horrific oil pipeline explosion in Nigeria that took over 260 lives is now being treated as a possible focus of epidemic disease because of the decaying bodies. I don't know why I'm bothering to say this-- again--but it always seems necessary. Dead bodies in mass casualties do not cause disease."

From OmniBrain, Glass Half Empty Overfilled.
"According to glassware elongation research, the tendency to pour more into a short glass leads to a 32-43% increase in consumption. Hosting a party? Use champagne flutes. "

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most German

Search All Blogs

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com