Seed Media Group

Page 3.14

The Best of ScienceBlogs, and Beyond

Search this blog

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

Profile

old_neuron.jpg Maintained by Seed's editors, web editors, and the other people who make Seed tick, Page 3.14 points you in the direction of some of ScienceBlogs' finest offerings, plus the tastiest tidbits of science news and opinion from around the web.

Other Good Stuff

MEMBER, ORDER OF THE SCIENCE SCOUTS OF EXEMPLARY REPUTE AND ABOVE AVERAGE PHYSIQUE



Add ScienceBlogs to your Technorati favorites:



Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

« ScienceBlogs Channel Photos, Week of Jan. 21-27 | Main | ScienceBlogs Channel Photos, Week of Jan. 28 - Feb. 3 »

An Interview with Martin Rundkvist of Aardvarchaeology

Category: AnnouncementArchaeologyBlogsScienceBlogs
Posted on: January 23, 2008 1:16 PM, by Virginia Hughes

martinyawn.jpg

Page 3.14 interviews are back! Somehow it's taken many moons for veteran SciBling Martin Rundkvist, of Aardvarchaeology, to answer our barrage of questions. The Swedish archaeologist (pictured at right with his daughter) made headlines recently when he discovered, while metal-detecting on the island of Djurö, a 92-centimeter, 16th-century sword. Much more below the fold...

What's your name?
Martin Rundkvist

What do you do when you're not blogging?
Four days a week, I'm a threadbare gentleman scholar doing research in the 1st Millennium AD archaeology of Sweden. One day a week, I'm the managing editor of Sweden's main archaeology journal, Fornvännen. Seven days a week, I wait for the Boomers to retire.

What is your blog called?
Aardvarchaeology

What's up with that name?
Aardvarks are cool nocturnal diggers in South Africa. Also, their name is the only word in the English language that begins with AA, which is good for blog-roll purposes.

How long have you been blogging, anyway?
Two years: I began in December 2005.

Where are you from and where do you live now?
I live two miles from my childhood home in a suburb of Stockholm, Sweden. No, I can't help anyone get the Nobel Prize.

Would you describe yourself as a working scientist?
Yeah, I work, though I only do fun stuff since I have no boss.

Any educational experiences or degrees you'd like to mention?
I'm a PhD. My most humbling educational experience was the two times I flunked my driver's license. Oh, I cried.

What are your main academic interests, in or out of your field?
I'm into prehistoric Scandinavia, mainly portable artifacts or "small finds" as they are also known.

Last book you read?
I dropped the last book I started. Jonah Lehrer's Proust was a Neuroscientist is full of romantic ideas about parallels between art and science. My take on this is that art is mainly just random outpourings of intellectual noise, and that if you look at large enough a sample of this noise you are bound to find something that fits the scientific model you have in mind.

What is your idea of a perfect day?
One involving sunshine, the outdoors, good food, friends and family, and no obligation to make small talk for too long.

What's your greatest habitual annoyance?
The fact that there's an unemployed Swedish archaeology PhD behind every shrubbery and only about three jobs in the entire business.

Who are your favorite writers?
Tolkien, LeGuin, Lovecraft, Gould, F.G. Bengtsson, F. Nilsson Piraten.

Who are your favorite heroes of fiction?
Cthulhu.

Your favorite heroes in real life?
Professionally, my old colleague Mats P. Malmer, the clear-thinkingest archaeologist ever. Privately, I don't really have heroes. Heroes, to my mind, tend to be made after the fact for propaganda purposes.

What's your most marked characteristic?
A silly and lewd sense of humour.

What's your fatal flaw?
Hey, I'm still alive and procreating—they don't look all that fatal to me!

What would you like to be?
A university lecturer!

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

A romantic hero for scientists indeed! And yet, I must quibble with:

My take on this is that art is mainly just random outpourings of intellectual noise, and that if you look at large enough a sample of this noise you are bound to find something that fits the scientific model you have in mind.

You might also find information about the structure of the "noise's" generator, which I gather is the point of the book....

Posted by: David Harmon | February 6, 2008 6:27 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com