Seed Media Group

Shifting Baselines

The Cure for Planetary Amnesia

The Shifting Baselines Blog

JacquetSEED.jpgJennifer Jacquet is a Ph.D. candidate with the Sea Around Us Project at the UBC Fisheries Centre. She works closely with Dr. Daniel Pauly, who coined the term Shifting Baselines, the syndrome on which this blog focuses. <img alt=
Josh Donlan
is a conservation scientist and a Visting Fellow at Cornell University. He often hides out in the backcountry of the Teton Mountains, pondering bygone giant beavers and ground sloths. He also is also the founder and Director of Advanced Conservation Strategies and has a habit of restoring remote islands.

RODodos.jpgScientist turned filmmaker Randy Olson, founder of the Shifting Baselines Ocean Media Project is also a blog contributor.

Search this blog

New Projects & Publications

April 2008: Randy Olson and the Puget Sound Partnership release the flash video Shifting Baselines in the Sound.

April 18, 2008: Jennifer Jacquet gives the talk "Market Inefficiencies: Why Do We Waste Good Fish on Pigs?" at a forage fish workshop hosted by the Marine Fish Conservation Network.

April 15, 2008: Josh Donlan gives a invited talk in New York at Wildlife Conservation Society's annual meeting, Gateways to Conservation 2008: The State of the Wild.

April 5, 2008: Randy Olson delivers the Claude Bernard Distinguished Lecture at the American Physiological Society meeting in San Diego, titled, "Don't Be Such a Scientist: Talking substance in an age of style."

March 15, 2008: Josh Donlan is selected as a 2008 Kinship Conservation Fellow. He will join 17 others from around the world to explore business and economic tools for biodiversity conservation gains.

March 6-13, 2008: Josh Donlan co-directs a working group at the US National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis in Santa Barbara. The group is exploring biodiversity offsets and market-based instruments as solutions for biodiversity-fishery bycatch offsets.

Mar. 25-27, 2008: Randy Olson presents his films and his "Don't Be Such a Scientist" lecture on science communication at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama.

Mar. 2008: Dr. Josh Donlan joins the Shifting Baselines blog.

Jan. 2008 Jennifer Jacquet launches the Eat Like a Pig Seafood Wallet Card EatLikeaPigHalf.jpg

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Online Resources and Blogs

« Shifting Shoppers: Paper or Plastic? | Main | Harmful Algae Likes It Hot, Hot »

Should More Jellies Fill Your Belly?

Category: Losing TrackSeafood
Posted on: April 7, 2008 9:09 AM, by Jennifer L. Jacquet

The Economist published an article last week on jellyfish, which featured a fellow graduate student at the Fisheries Centre, Lucas Brotz. Can jellyfish really be the future of seafood? Jellyfish only provide about 4 calories per 100 g but, beyond that, there is a real danger of encouraging demand for a product that was spawned from unhealthy and poorly managed oceans...

Jellyfish push out incredibly valuable, and diverse, marine ecosystems. Scientists may somehow turn jellyfish into food, tyres or flip-flops, but it is hard to imagine an industry based on a product that is at least 95% water will ever be economically superior to one based on a diverse and healthy marine ecosystem. In 2004, fish caught in the ocean netted $85 billion on first sale. Do we want to grow an industry that has a vested interest in a very different kind of ocean to the one we have today? The world has to decide what kind of ocean it wants: one thriving with diverse marine life, or one swimming with a few hundred species of jellyfish.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

#1
Jellyfish only provide about 4 calories per 100 g

And yet, they can fuel sufficient growth to produce this!

Posted by: Sven DIMilo | April 7, 2008 10:13 AM

#2

I know! And let's not forget the mola mola, too. Have you seen this excellent TED talk on sunfish?

Posted by: Jennifer L. Jacquet | April 7, 2008 10:21 AM

#3

As heartening as it is to see that some species can flourish on a diet of jellyfish, I really wonder if they'd flourish in an ocean in which we were missing the full compliment of diverse lifeforms which currently flourish as well. Somehow I doubt it, and I'm a little afraid to find out. In the mean time I guess we should "dig in".

Posted by: doug l | April 7, 2008 3:15 PM

#4

Please; they are not a variety of fish. Can't we please call them "sea jellies"? And starfish are not fish either. And Shellfish...

Posted by: BlindSquirrel | April 19, 2008 1:33 AM

#5

Blind Squirrel, You nailed Lucas' only complaint about the article. He fully agrees with you that that they should be called 'jellies', which we also support here at SB (note the post's title). This will no doubt have to be settled in the future as they become a more common foodstuff...

Posted by: Jennifer L. Jacquet | April 19, 2008 5:29 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Most Active

  1. Biology needs to explain gravity? 05.16.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. We are such bad boys 05.16.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. California Supreme Court Overturns Ban on Gay Marriage 05.16.2008 · Ed Brayton
  4. Pielke train wreck 05.16.2008 · Tim Lambert
  5. 9th Circuit Upholds School Dress Code 05.16.2008 · Ed Brayton

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com