recapred.png

From gluons to galaxies, one scientist takes on all the mysteries the Universe has to offer.

Ethan's Profile

Ethan's Halloween photo Ethan Siegel is a theoretical astrophysicist who currently teaches at Lewis & Clark College in Portland, OR. You can learn about him, contact him, or just enjoy the site.

Search

Recent Posts

Upcoming Events

April 8th @ 7PM -- premiere of the short film "Dark Matter", starring me, at Hollywood Theatre in Portland, OR!

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Astronomy/Physics Interesting Projects Humor

« The New and Improved Hubble in Brief | Main | Weekend Diversion: The Movies »

How many in the Quintet today?

Category: AstronomyGalaxiesHubble
Posted on: September 11, 2009 11:55 AM, by Ethan Siegel

Perhaps my favorite of the new Hubble pictures is this one of Stephan's Quintet (and click here for the 1000 pixel wide version):

stephansquintet_hubblesmall.jpg

It's so stunning that it was chosen as today's Astronomy Picture of the Day. But yesterday, I got a very interesting question to go along with it:

These galaxies are far away, and so we're looking at them in the past. What do they look like today, and are there still five of them?
This is a great question. First off, looking at the image, some of you will count only four galaxies. That's because there are two galaxies that are in the process of merging. You can see both galactic nuclei still, and some intense star formation (the white and pink areas) on the outskirts. Most galaxies have their own designation; the three isolated ones are known as NGC 7317, 7319, and 7320. However, these two merging ones are NGC 7318A and NGC 7318B.

Now, the galaxy in the upper left, NGC 7320, is not grouped with the other four. It's simply in the line-of-sight, and is roughly 40 million light-years away. However, the other four are 300 million light-years away, meaning that we're looking at the light that was emitted 300 million years ago.

What do these things look like today? In other words, if we could magically transport ourselves over there, how many galaxies would there be? Four? Three? Two? Just one?

Well, for typical galaxies, it takes over a billion years for two of them to merge completely. But these four have already started merging. Two of them are really close to having merged completely, and in the 300 million years that light has been on its way to us, those two galaxies "caught in the act" are certainly one by now. The one in the upper right will certainly merge eventually, but 300 million years is simply too short a time to see that happen.

And the pretty elliptical one in the lower left? Well, that will certainly take longer than 300 million years to merge, but it's highly likely that numerous galaxies have already merged to form it. Most isolated galaxies are spirals, and most galaxies that undergo mergers become ellipticals. So when we look back on the quintet in two billion years, you'll simply have the foreground galaxy and one large, background, elliptical galaxy. But right now? Over there? There are probably three.

But don't just take my word for it. Check out this video of merging spiral galaxies made by Patrik at UC Santa Cruz:

At least, check out the first 90 seconds or so. Because that is three billion years condensed into less than two minutes, and you can totally see for yourself how close to a completed merger some of these actually are! Enjoy the view, and have a great weekend!

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/119723

Comments

1

'Today' is a local term. I find the question about what happens faraway, today, meaningless. Causally-disconnected regions are just... disconnected. I mean, inherently disconnected... What do you think?

Posted by: Nivra | September 11, 2009 2:40 PM

2

So why do the further galaxies look more orange? Is it due to intergalactic dust absorbing the shorter blue wavelengths, or is it a computer generated false colour image? Or some other reason?

Posted by: Wayne Robinson | September 11, 2009 6:42 PM

3

First post after lurking for some time.

How violent and fast is this process of merging actually? Although it takes place over a very long period in human perspective, what in terms of speed and time are we talking about in the grand scale of the universe. And how violent is it? Are the two central black holes going to merge and what are the consequences. Also, there is a lot of empty space between stars, but percentage speaking; about how many stars will actually collide or have such an impact on each other that any star that has a planet with a chance of life on it will be affected in such a way that we can assume that life is no longer possible.

Posted by: Arjen | September 11, 2009 8:58 PM

4

I'd like to echo Arjen's question. How would such a merger affect individual stars and their planetary systems? For instance, would we ever see planets 'jumping' from a system to another and live to tell the tale? I realize the odds of this happening would be incredibly slim, but is it even possible? And... does an elliptical galaxy feature more binary stars than another type of galaxy, as a result of previous mergers? Fascinating topic :)

Posted by: Seb | September 12, 2009 1:41 PM

5

What a great question, and a superb answer! Well done to the questioner.

Posted by: Crux Australis | September 13, 2009 4:59 PM

6

why are galaxies going to merge?
by what power are galaxies pulled?

Posted by: yumiyuki | September 18, 2009 2:29 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.