Now on ScienceBlogs: Twitter: as in actual science jargon (something to do with marmosets and shrews)

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

From gluons to galaxies, one scientist takes on all the mysteries the Universe has to offer.

Ethan's Profile

Ethan's Halloween photo Ethan Siegel is a theoretical astrophysicist who currently teaches at Lewis & Clark College in Portland, OR. You can learn about him, contact him, or just enjoy the site.

Search

Recent Posts

Upcoming Events

April 8th @ 7PM -- premiere of the short film "Dark Matter", starring me, at Hollywood Theatre in Portland, OR!

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Astronomy/Physics Interesting Projects Humor

« Weekend Diversion: Is Your School Prepared for H1N1 Zombies?! | Main | I was in a movie! »

All the Junk in Our Solar System

Category: AstronomySolar System
Posted on: October 12, 2009 8:41 PM, by Ethan Siegel

My Very Educated Mother Just Served Us Nine Pickles.
--Children everywhere, up until very recently
Taking a look at the new ring discovered around Saturn made me realize something. Most of us don't realize how full of crap our Solar System is.

I don't mean planets, or moons, or comets or asteroids, although there are certainly plenty to go around. A brief recap of what happened around Saturn first. Saturn has seven glorious, inner rings that we're familiar with, that make it a magnificent sight for skywatchers everywhere.

saturn_generic_600.jpg

If you look closely at this image, you will see a few white dots in the picture. Know what those are? Some of Saturn's Moons. Titan is the biggest, followed by Rhea, and then Iapetus. All told, Saturn has at least 61 Moons, but Iapetus is the most distant large Moon, coming it at 40% the size of our own Moon. All of Saturn's moons are made of highly reflective material, giving them what we call a high albedo. But Iapetus has this weird coloration to it, as captured by Cassini:

iapetus-bright.jpg

You see, part of it has a similar albedo to the rest of Saturn's moons. But the darker, brownish side of it has a much lower albedo. Why? Material knocked off of a darker moon even farther out, Phoebe, gets into Iapetus' orbital path, and lands on one side of Iapetus only, turning it a dark, dirt-like color.

What does Phoebe look like?

phoebe_cassini.jpg

Well, it not only doesn't look like Iapetus, it doesn't look like most moons. In particular, it looks like an asteroid. Compare with this asteroid below.

asteroid_ida.jpg

In fact, someone pointed out to me that Phoebe is probably a captured asteroid.

It isn't.

Phoebe has the wrong density, albedo, and composition to be an asteroid. It's a captured piece of junk. You know about asteroids, which live between Mars and Jupiter. You also know about Kuiper Belt objects, which live out past Neptune's orbit. But have you ever heard of Centaurs?

centaur2.jpg

Not that kind! Centaurs were half-man/half-horse creatures. In the Solar System, we have some half-asteroid/half-comet objects that we call Centaurs. These probably originated out past Neptune, but now orbit in between Jupiter and Neptune. (In orange, below.)

611px-Outersolarsystem_objectpositions_labels_comp.png

They have orbits more like asteroids, but material compositions similar to comets. In fact, if we let Phoebe get close to the Sun, it would develop a cometary tail!

Why is this interesting? Remember the IAU's definition of a planet:

A "planet" is a celestial body that:
  1. is in orbit around the Sun,
  2. has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and
  3. has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.
Apparently, "clearing your orbit" doesn't mean the same thing as "clearing the table". You don't have to reach a state of "all-clear" to count yourself successful. In fact, there are plenty of them still left.

500px-TheKuiperBelt_42AU_Centaurs.svg.png

These "centaurs" are not stable, as within a few million years they'll all be either kicked out of orbit, thrown to the inner or outer solar system, or captured by one of the gas giants.

But they'll be replaced by new centaurs coming in from beyond Neptune.

Know what? This isn't the only junk out there. If we look around Jupiter, we find two classes of "asteroid" that are in Jupiter's orbit: Greeks and Trojans. (Never mind the brown "Hildas"!)

InnerSolarSystem-en.png

The "Greeks" orbit 60 degrees ahead of a planet in its orbit, while the "Trojans" orbit 60 degrees behind it. These are also only temporary, but they sure to add up! Jupiter -- right now -- has thousands! The other gas giants have many, as well. But even the inner solar system gets in on the action; our own dear Earth has one! (It's named Cruithne; have a look below!)

Cruithne.jpg

So, there are asteroids and comets, but also a bunch of them that have migrated into other planets' orbits. Some of them become moons (right, Mars?), others accrue Greek and Trojan asteroids (indeed, Jupiter?), and others either get kicked out or melt away. But there's junk everywhere, not just in these neat little belts that we define.

So the next time you're planning a trip through the Solar System, make sure your map is very, very good. If not, one of these rogue rocks could completely ruin your day, just like they (appear to) ruin the IAU's definition of 'planet'!

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/122150

Comments

1

"Most of us don't realize how full of crap our Solar System is." - and most of it's in Washignton DC!

Posted by: IanW | October 13, 2009 7:31 AM

2

The planet rules set is missing one:
4. Your name is not Pluto

Rule 3 (which killed Pluto) seems to be pretty arbitrarily applied looking at your graphs.

Posted by: Mu | October 13, 2009 10:35 AM

3

Now we're discovering main belt comets, the distinction between asteroid and comet/centaur is blurring anyway. I thought trojans aren't that temporary, at least the Jovian ones, with orbital lifetimes similar to the age of the solar system.

Of course, your whole post is bass-ackwards: the solar system is full of interesting stuff, but people insist on paying attention to those crappy planet things instead, because they're the bully boys that throw everything else around.

Posted by: Vagueofgodalming | October 13, 2009 3:02 PM

4

Ixnay on the utoplay. You'll get the nuts in here (again).

I've been wondering something about the Jovian Lagrange points: Are they stable enough that we could put satellites there (assuming we have a way of braking the things)? I'd've thought they would be good places to put relays for the 'interplanetary communications network'. It seems down right silly that we're still relying on direct line of sight for recovering so precious data.

Posted by: Sili | October 13, 2009 4:01 PM

5

Funny that you say that, NASA is funding a program to put football field size antennas for relay purposes just there (to communicate with a possible Mars mission independently of planetary position).

Posted by: Mu | October 13, 2009 4:04 PM

6

"In fact, someone pointed out to me that Phoebe is probably a captured asteroid."

I certainly hope you aren't referring to me when I said "Actually, the story is a tad more complicated than that. Phoebe is probably a captured body and didn't form along with the inner satellites. The retrograde orbit with a huge semimajor axis is a dead giveaway."

I certainly do not see the word asteroid in there anywhere.

Posted by: Colin | October 13, 2009 7:10 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM