I have this one little saying. When things get too heavy just call me helium, the lightest known gas to man. -Jimi HendrixHendrix is almost right: helium is the second lightest gas known to man, behind hydrogen. But there are many applications for helium -- both scientific and non-scientific -- that make it incredibly useful and practical. Helium is far lighter than air and is inert, which means it won't combust when you combine it with air and energy, like Hydrogen does (below).
(Too bad for the kids who want hydrogen balloons for their birthday parties!)
In addition to being lighter than air, Helium is incredibly useful, scientifically, in its liquid form! With a boiling point of only 4 Kelvin, liquid helium is used to cool some of the most powerful electromagnets on Earth, including those at Fermilab and the Large Hadron Collider. It's the first known superfluid, a fluid that has many interesting properties, including absolutely no viscosity, and it will never come to rest or lose energy once you start it in motion!
But -- as Lee Billings wrote earlier this week -- Helium is pretty rare on Earth, and we're running out of it. Although Helium is the second most common element in the Universe (behind Hydrogen), it's incredibly rare on Earth. There are only two places to find Helium. The first is the Earth's atmosphere.
The exosphere -- the uppermost layer of the atmosphere -- contains small amounts of Helium. Compared to the rest of the atmosphere, five parts per million are Helium, which means that extracting Helium from the atmosphere is incredibly inefficient and expensive, so much so that we don't do it.
Where do we get our Helium from, then? Believe it or not, we mine it from underground!
This above image is the U.S. Bureau of Land Management's Crude Helium Enrichment Facility in Texas. It supplies about 40% of the Helium produced in my country, and it all comes from pockets of Helium that live underground.
Want to know how it got there?
That's right; radioactivity! You see, when our Earth was formed, it was loaded up with a whole slew of unstable elements, including everything on the periodic table that's heavier than Lead, such as Uranium, Thorium, Radium, and Radon. Since these elements are unstable, they radioactively decay.
Even though some of these elements take billions of years to decay (on average), the Earth has been around for billions of years! Not only that, but there are three ways that particles can decay. The first type discovered -- alpha decay -- is when a radioactive particle emits a Helium nucleus!
Find a couple of electrons, and what have you got?
Helium! So if you get an ore of the right type of radioactive element, and you wait millions and millions (or even billions) of years, you make a giant underground store of helium!
So the good news is that these underground stores exist, so we have a supply of Helium for all of our scientific (and non-scientific) purposes. But the bad news? When we use it up, we'll have to wait million of years for it to build back up, or figure out some non-prohibitively expensive way to recover it from the atmosphere. (It's so expensive that many are thinking of mining the Moon when we're out of it on Earth!)
I'm all for environmentalism and conservation, but even if you aren't, running out of Helium poses a serious problem for the continuing advancement of science and technology. Helium on Earth is scarce. It took millions of years to make the stores we have now, and once they're gone, they'll be gone for thousands of generations.
So be careful with the precious things you have, and treat them like the precious things they are, even if others don't. Because some of them -- like Helium -- are truly irreplaceable.
Physical Science
Environment
Comments
You never answer the main question of WHY Helium on earth is scarce. Is there a simple answer?
Posted by: James | March 17, 2010 7:51 PM
It's so light that it escapes from the atmosphere.
Posted by: David Marjanović
| March 17, 2010 7:54 PM
So.... no more helium balloons?
And, if helium is so scarce, why are helium balloons so common?
Posted by: Stephen Downes | March 17, 2010 7:55 PM
" ......it will never come to rest or lose energy once you start it in motion!"
Really? So why is this not powering turbines to produce electricity?
Great post again, thanks !
Posted by: dave w. | March 17, 2010 8:01 PM
Well Stephen, Helium as a gas takes up a LOT more space than liquid Helium does, about 22.4 times at STP. So very little is actually required to fill a balloon compared to the rather large amounts required for cooling and scientific endeavours. Oh, and to fill them with the only reasonable alternative that would still allow them to rise in the air is potentially dangerous considering the age of your average helium balloon enthusiast : )
Posted by: Science and Honor | March 17, 2010 8:07 PM
Hey, not so glum! We are, after all, working on ways to make more.
Posted by: D. C. Sessions | March 17, 2010 8:15 PM
While the longer term problem is that demand is going to outstrip supply, the shorter term problem is that the supply is being mismanaged.
The government did a reasonable job, but the Republican ideologues wanted to privatize it, so the oil extractors are now in charge. Figure it out. Which pays better next quarter: maximizing oil extraction while wasting helium; or conserving long-term helium productivity potential at the expense of oil you can sell for $82 barrel?
Posted by: Harry Eagar | March 17, 2010 8:20 PM
That picture of the Hindenburg exploding shows kerosene fuel on fire, not hydrogen. Hydrogen oxidation radiates in the UV, and produces no soot. Of course, once the fuel tanks were blown up, the hydrogen went up too, but the H. would have been little better off if lofted with helium.
Posted by: Nathan Myers | March 17, 2010 8:46 PM
Small pedantic point re "when our Earth was formed, it was loaded up with a whole slew of unstable elements,including everything on the periodic table that's heavier than Lead, such as Uranium, Thorium, Radium, and Radon". Actually radium-226 (in uranium decay series) with a half-life of 1600 years and radon-222 with a half-life of 3.8 days are being continually replenished by decay of their parent uranium. The comment applies only to uranium and thorium.
Posted by: bruced | March 17, 2010 11:00 PM
People are thinking about mining the moon for He-3, which is a lot rarer than the usual He-4.
Posted by: Thomas | March 18, 2010 2:58 AM
Of course if you consider isotopomers then Helium makes it to #3 (or a very close race with D2 between #3 and #4).
Posted by: MadScientist | March 18, 2010 3:32 AM
Mining the moon? What would the mechanism be for trapping He on the moon? Here on earth it tends to be trapped in the hydrocarbons (including natural gas to some extent) which are in turn trapped in ancient sand deposits with various minerals above acting as a seal (though seals aren't that crucial for the oil deposits where most of our helium comes from). The moon will have no significant hydrocarbon deposits because there was no life (or never abundant life) on the moon, so dissolution in hydrocarbons is out of the question. Since the moon has no rivers either and it is primarily prehistoric river systems on earth which create the storage and sealing formations, how do people imagine He will be trapped on the moon?
Unfortunately helium is not readily replaced in numerous applications since many applications do rely on the peculiar characteristics of helium. In many instances such as cooling detectors to very low temperatures we'll have to make do with far less efficient systems.
Posted by: MadScientist | March 18, 2010 5:29 AM
It's captured from the solar wind when it slams into the regolith.
Posted by: Dunc | March 18, 2010 6:28 AM
There is some debate over what exactly is producing the visible flame in the Hindenburg footage, but I've never before heard the claim that it's kerosene. A more common claim (and one proven plausible by that geek instutition, Mythbusters) is that the flame and soot and sparks are the product of burning the doped muslin envelope, which, in the precise conditions of the Hindenburg, would act basically as thermite.
So I agree that the flame isn't entirely hydrogen (which burns nearly invisibly), but I disagree that it's kerosene. The envelope is clearly on fire; that's plenty of material to produce a colored flame.
Posted by: Calli Arcale | March 18, 2010 9:52 AM
When the helium from our balloons is let out does it go up and reside in the upper atmosphere or does it completely leave the earth?
Posted by: rick king | March 18, 2010 10:52 AM
In time the helium will completely leave earth. We're lucky that our planet has enough gravity to hold on to the nitrogen and oxygen we have in the atmosphere; Mars, being a bit smaller, lost those and all that's left is carbon dioxide.
Posted by: Mu | March 18, 2010 11:32 AM
Everyone,
Has annyone ever thought about FUSION to get all of this helium we dont have?? Hello!! I know Fusion might be 50, 100 even 1000 years away... but when its achieved in the right way there will be in theory an endless supply of elements(hopefully no supernova tho...lolz)
*J
Posted by: Jim Jones | March 18, 2010 11:41 AM
I thought our main sources were Helium associated with natural gas. Of course it is fairly common for NG and Oil to be found together. So I think most of our supply came from a few formations where the natural gas (methane) had a high concentration of Helium. So in essence the Helium is a byproduct of some natural gas wells. The problem is the economics is driven by the fossil fuel, and not by some potential future high value of Helium. So standard accounting, which exponentially discounts the future, says "don't waste money capturing and storing more Helium than we need for current consumption". Of course the economics theory of substitutability, claims uh don't worry about not having any Helium in say 100 years, we will be clever enough to find an alternative doesn't recognize the unique properties of the stuff.
Mu. I think Mars loses CO2 as well. Its just that it has a reservoir of solid CO2 replenshing it. The earth as well loses some atmosphere, more so for the lighter molecules, but we do lose Oxygen, Nitrogen, and CO2 as well. Just not so much that the system has been depleted.
Posted by: Omega Centauri | March 18, 2010 12:20 PM
Something I have been wondering that is only tangentially related:
I am under the impression that the heaviest element that can be made by solar fusion is lead. Therefore, I am confused as to how all the heavier elements are made. Is my initial supposition wrong? If not, how do the elements heavier than Pb come into being?
Posted by: JBC | March 18, 2010 1:45 PM
Hi JBC,
Yep, your impression is incorrect. All the heavy elements are made in supernovas, including radioactive ones (radioactive decays power much of the visible display of the supernova). Lead's just the heaviest stable element.
Posted by: Craig Heinke | March 18, 2010 2:21 PM
Actually, iron is the heaviest element produced in normal fusion processes. The heavier elements were created only in supernovas of first and second generation stars.
Posted by: Mike Meyerson | March 18, 2010 2:21 PM
Just a followup to #1 and #2:
#2 is correct that the helium evaporates from the earth. (Contrary to the implications of Ethan's article it won't stay in the exosphere forever. Calculating the fraction of the Boltzmann distribution that's above escape velocity is a fun physics problem.)
The other fact that explains why we're in danger of running out of helium and not hydrogen (which evaporates even faster!) is due to helium's inertness (as mentioned by Ethan). Most of our hydrogen gets bound up in heavier molecules with lower vapor pressures, but helium stands alone.
That's why helium recycling is important. If I don't recycle my aluminum can, the problem isn't that we lose the aluminum from the earth, it's just that it will take more energy to get those atoms back into a useful form than if I recycled it. If I don't recycle my helium (and my guess is most users don't), the atoms eventually leave the planet.
Posted by: Anonymous Coward | March 18, 2010 3:04 PM
I was sitting with my kid at Chick-Fil-A a couple of years ago and she asked where helium came from for the balloons they had there. "From a compressed gas cylinder" was not an acceptable answer. So, I learned some of what you wrote on my own and got some great feedback from readers at this post:
http://scienceblogs.com/terrasig/2007/10/getting_a_rise_out_of_helium.php
I learned that Qatar and Algeria are giving the US a run for our money in helium recovery. Josh Rosenau also pointed out that while some helium comes from Texas and is shipped from there, 2/3 comes from a site in SW Kansas via a pipeline to the Texas panhandle. Great stuff - I love learning all the things I blew off when I had freshman chemistry.
Posted by: Abel Pharmboy | March 18, 2010 4:29 PM
i don't know about the Hindenberg flames being due to kerosene. that stuff burns orange, and the Hindenberg is clearly burning in black and white. it must have been some super secret german gas.
i saw a special on PBS about how the fire started. it was always assumed that the hydrogen was ignited from a spark or lightning.
however, the special gave good evidence that the panels of doped cloth on the airship weren't properly grounded. they built up a large electrostatic potential between them which caused a spark that ignited the cloth itself. as the cloth burned, it ignited the hydrogen bladders, which didn't help the matter at all.
(they tracked down some samples of the doped cloth that was used on the airships and tested them for flammability by spark ignition)
Posted by: rob | March 18, 2010 4:52 PM
Ethan
An off topic comment, related to your cosmic distance record blog and discussion of metal free stars.
You may not have seen this New Scientist article Primordial giant: The star that time forgot.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527470.900-primordial-giant-the-star-that-time-forgot.html?page=1
It discusses a giant low metal star found in a nearby dwarf galaxy. A quote of interest, " this was a star that should not have existed, in a place where it should never have been. It was a mind-bogglingly massive star that was a throwback to a universe long since gone. "
OK that's a heads up for you.
Posted by: Thomas Neil Neubert | March 18, 2010 4:57 PM
Like yesterday, the video doesn't work for me. "An error occurred, please try again later." :-(
No. Mars (like, BTW, Venus) still has a lot of nitrogen, and never had any oxygen (except for traces produced by UV destroying water; those are still on Mars, though as part of the rust, not of the atmosphere).
What's going on is that the gravity of Mars is small enough (1/6 that of the Earth) that small asteroid impacts can erode the atmosphere. That seems to be what has happened, and why the atmosphere is so thin (the pressure is very low).
Wow, thanks a lot! Very impressive.
Posted by: David Marjanović
| March 18, 2010 5:51 PM
Standard disclaimer: I don't have a blog, I just need to pretend so I can comment on Pharyngula.
Posted by: David Marjanović
| March 18, 2010 5:54 PM
Am I the only one who read this and immediately thought of the episode of Gilligan's Island where they find the hole in the ground with helium flowing out of it? I hate to spoil it for those of you who didn't see it, but, sadly, their plan to get off the island in a helium balloon failed.
Posted by: Bruce Sharp | March 19, 2010 8:34 AM
Bruce: i had forgot that one. but you reminded me of another episode where they discover a jungle boy living on the island. kinda like a young tarzan.
who was the actor that played the jungle boy?
oh, and to keep this on topic, at cosmicvariance i read that the LHC uses 96 tonnes of liquid He. TONNES! that would fill one heck of a party balloon.
Posted by: rob | March 19, 2010 12:18 PM
Rob, the jungle boy episode actually was the helium episode. And the actor was... drum roll, please... Kurt Russell. Gilligan's Island and Big Trouble in Little China... now that's a resume!
Posted by: Bruce Sharp | March 19, 2010 9:26 PM
@Dunc: So the helium nuclei hit the regolith - and then what? How is the helium trapped so that it doesn't simply find its way to the surface and into space? Like I said, here on earth it tends to be trapped by any number of layers which are effectively impermeable to He, and these layers tend to be associated with ancient marine or river systems.
Posted by: MadScientist | March 20, 2010 7:09 AM
This is a case where government policy makes all the difference. Helium is a constituent in most natural gas reservoirs--as you point out, it is alpha particles with captured electrons. It mixes with other gases and sits in the reservoirs at a low concentration. It makes sense for the government to subsidize the extraction of helium and make it available for scientific use as they did for many years. With the vast reserves of gas shales coming online, there will be loads of helium for the foreseeable future--if we extract it!
Posted by: Tom Barber | March 21, 2010 8:49 PM
Another possibility in the long-term might be to capture helium from the solar wind, with a modified "solar sail". Alternatively, we might capture it from the atmosphere of either the sun itself, or one of the gas giants.
Posted by: David Harmon | March 22, 2010 1:05 PM
Are there any long term solutions being proposed or are we turning a blind eye on the situation and letting the next generation worry about it?
This was news to me - I wasn't aware there was a problem.
Posted by: Cherry Hill Wedding Photographer | March 23, 2010 2:48 AM
Why is helium so scarce on Earth? First, it has a very low molecular weight. Particles in a gas of uniform temperature roughly follow a particular probabilistic distribution of kinetic energies. A typical helium atom has one seventh the mass of an N2 molecule, so helium atoms jostle about at roughly the square root of seven times the speed of nitrogen molecules. This is too fast for Earth retain helium over geologic time periods. Second, it is a noble gas and does not bond chemically, like hydrogen, to form compounds or heavier molecules.
Posted by: Tim Gaede | March 23, 2010 5:53 PM
Nice article. One thing i still wonder is that we have technologically advanced so very much but unfortunately we can't 'create' an element from a different element. Guess its just the power of the nucleus that makes it so difficult.
One good thing about Helium is that since it is inert, it wouldn't chemically react with any other element/compound.
So basically all the used up Helium goes back into the 'exosphere' or 'stratosphere' whatever it is. Now how do we get it back from there? Is there a way to isolate it from air? As chemically it wouldn't be possible.
Neil from seo articles
Posted by: Neil Andrew | April 16, 2010 8:32 AM
@Neil Andrew:
Of course we can do that! Unfortunately, it requires lots of energy and time (and therefore lots of money)... See e. g. at Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_transmutationPosted by: Bjoern | April 16, 2010 10:57 AM
While helium occurs in minute quantities, that we are mining it faster than it is able to regenerate itself is clear testimony that we are living unsustainably. And in many ways, helium is a microcosm of the many of the natural resources such as fish, oil and forests. This, for me, is a far greater problem than the fact that the absence of helium will slow the advancement of science and technology.
Posted by: Msb | April 22, 2010 1:05 PM
As is the case in most situations, am sure the scientific fraternity will come up with a substitute of some sort or even some synthetic helium. Governments, universities and corporations would therefore be well-advised to channel R&D resources to finding a solution to this problem. Seems to me it will be quite lucrative.
Posted by: Rhonda | April 22, 2010 2:00 PM
I always thought that balloons were made of helium, at least the ones that float. I love the way your voice changes!
The way our atmosphere is being polluted and the ozone layer getting thinner, the only stable resource we have for now is our land.
Posted by: Fettverbrennungsofen Erfahrungen | April 23, 2010 5:39 PM
Whatever scientific research is using helium, are they really necessary? And since our helium source is really low, shouldn't we try to find other alternatives before it actually runs out & we would have to suffer more consequences because of that? We should try not to keep sucking our resources dry every time! That's the very reason we have such a long list of endangered species and natural disasters!
Posted by: Schnell Abnehmen | April 24, 2010 7:18 PM
Craigslist leads all other online classified ad sites and holds the number one position year after year.
It pulls millions of prospective customers every month worldwide.
You have the ability to submit ads for whatever you want.
. If you currently use Craigslist, or plan on using Craigslist as a business to make money.
just visit:
http://www.cladgenius.com
Posted by: zeebra | May 27, 2010 7:09 PM
Guess its just the power of the nucleus that makes it so difficult.
Posted by: bow ties | June 18, 2010 12:25 PM
Why is helium so scarce? I never realized that there was helium underground as well!
Posted by: Dating Sites Schweiz | July 5, 2010 11:29 AM
Is Helium non-renewable. I don't see how it can scarce if it is still so cheap. Maybe just a little too early to tell.
Posted by: Joe - Carpet Cleaning Websites | July 9, 2010 9:30 AM
Helium on Earth is scarce. It took millions of years to make the stores we have now, and once they're gone, they'll be gone for thousands of generations.
Posted by: Oregon Elder Law | July 28, 2010 12:40 PM
Never knew that Helium can be very dangerous ! OMG
Best
http://www.babapandey.com/
Posted by: Baba | August 16, 2010 2:58 PM
Why can't humans just leave this stuff alone? If we use it all we can't use it for further research or better purposses just like oil. We use it all and then we move on, no idea what the consequences are. But who cares where our children have to live, we lived good.
Posted by: Henry .K | August 18, 2010 4:46 AM
Helium in the wrong hands is dangerous, people are just destroying our resources with little thought to what they are doin got our planet or the legacy we are leaving the next generation.Noosa accommodation
Posted by: Sue | August 22, 2010 11:44 PM
It took millions of years to make the stores we have now, and once they're gone, they'll be gone for thousands of generations.
Posted by: FHI | August 26, 2010 12:43 PM
Because some of them -- like Helium -- are truly irreplaceable.
Posted by: Waschmaschine Frontlader | August 27, 2010 11:43 AM
“I am a possibilist. I believe that humanity is master of its own fate... Before we can change direction, we have to question many of the assumptions underlying our current philosophy. Assumptions like bigger is better; you can't stop progress; no speed is too fast; globalization is good.
Windows Defender
Posted by: lisaa | August 30, 2010 2:10 PM
Helium is very light and as far as I know it is lighter than hydrogen (I think). It is one of the most useful applications that most people can make use of. It is really great.
Posted by: Yeast Infection | September 1, 2010 11:18 PM
I was unaware that helium was that scarce on planet earth. I figured it to be a common element and thus it would be found all over the atmosphere...I guess not.
Posted by: EasyFreerollPoker | September 7, 2010 1:22 AM
If hydrogen is lighter than helium and helium is rare because it is so light then why is hydrogen not rare also?
Posted by: Child Support Collection Agencies | September 8, 2010 3:44 PM
We only have 16 helium mines in the world and they will not last long. When we are using the helium for balloons then it will escape into the atmosphere and we will not get it back again.
Helium is rare because it is't as reactive as hydrogen. Hydrogen is very good to make bonding to other atoms.
Posted by: tim_ventetøj | September 10, 2010 7:54 AM
Why can't we just leave it alone? If we use it all we can't use it for further research or better purposes just like oil. We use it all and then we move on, no idea what the consequences are. But who cares where our children have to live, we lived good.
Posted by: SixPack | September 10, 2010 2:19 PM
The problem is the economics is driven by the fossil fuel, and not by some potential future high value of Helium. So standard accounting, which exponentially discounts the future, says "don't waste money capturing and storing more Helium than we need for current consumption". Of course the economics theory of substitutability, claims uh don't worry about not having any Helium in say 100 years, we will be clever enough to find an alternative doesn't recognize the unique properties of the stuff. How To Get Abs.
Posted by: saveearth | September 10, 2010 2:22 PM
Of course you don't store something like helium until it becomes commercially viable. Once the viability exists so will the means to produce/capture it. And we may never use it.
Lisa Krempasky
Posted by: Lisa Krempasky | September 11, 2010 8:17 PM
You see if we use it all we can't use it for further research or better purposses just like oil. We use it all and then we move on, no idea what the consequences are. But who cares where our children have to live, we lived good. regards pc software thanks.
Posted by: dave west | September 13, 2010 2:49 PM
It's the first known super-fluid, a fluid that has many interesting properties, including absolutely no viscosity, and it will never come to rest or lose energy once you start it in motion!
Posted by: auto transport | September 22, 2010 7:31 AM
What a fascinating article! I didn't know any of that info about Helium that you posted. Where else is it mined besides Texas? It must be very expensive if it takes billions of years to produce, right?
Yet, there always seems to be no lack of helium at the grocery store for those who want to buy helium balloons-you know, those mylar things filled with helium. I've even seen large tanks full of the stuff at children's birthday parties.
Are we wasting helium or is there plenty of it to go around?
As a houston locksmith with an inquiring mind, I would like to know the answers.
Posted by: Daniel | September 28, 2010 6:29 PM
Helium is incredibly useful, scientifically, in its liquid form! With a boiling point of only 4 Kelvin, liquid helium is used to cool some of the most powerful electromagnets on Earth, including those at Fermilab and the Large Hadron Collider.
last post :http://iwantedyoulyrics.blogspot.com
Posted by: rucha patel | October 4, 2010 3:16 PM
Helium on Earth is scarce. It took millions of years to make the stores we have now, and once they're gone, they'll be gone for thousands of generations.
Posted by: stop foreclosure in west virginia | October 9, 2010 11:43 PM
Science and Honor - that is 22.4 liters per mole (not times)
Posted by: redskool | October 13, 2010 9:00 AM
I was also not aware at all that helium is so rare. Who is actually in control of most of the earth´s helium reserves?
Posted by: offshore company dubai | October 20, 2010 9:29 PM
Scientists say that Earth's helium reserves will run outn within 25 - 30 years.
This will be a dsaster for hospitals which use it to cool MRI scanners.
Posted by: directory | October 21, 2010 5:41 PM
Whatever will happen to our kids balloons if Helium never existed?? haha:) I'm so glad I have my canon lenses to capture my daughter's smile.:)
Posted by: Karen Anderson | November 8, 2010 9:10 PM
o nice pic.
Posted by: Krishna Bogati | November 10, 2010 2:37 AM
You see if we use it all we can't use it for further research or better purposses just like oil. We use it all and then we move on, no idea what the consequences are. But who cares where our children have to live, we lived good. regards pc software thanks.
Posted by: Oyunu oyna | November 10, 2010 4:47 AM
So if Helium is becoming very rare on Earth, and we are running out of it, with Helium being the second most common element in the Universe (behind Hydrogen) does that mean it is theoretically possible for the planet to use up all the helium it has? If this was the case what would the result be?
Would that scenario ever be possible?
Matched Betting
Just curious
Posted by: Pete | November 10, 2010 6:40 AM
First of all, you blew my mind with all of that "superfluid" stuff. I never knew that Helium was so versatile. Much like half the people commenting on this post, I thought helium was just a gas that kept our balloons afloat. I mean, I knew that it was used to cool things like the Large Hadron Collider(I figure it takes a little more than ice from a manitowoc ice machine to cool something like that), but a superfuid with absolutely no viscosity? Imagine my surprise, eh? After watching that video though, I see helium is some serious stuff. Secondly, you mentioned that it is very expensive to scavenge helium out of the atmosphere, so some people are considering mining the moon for it. I am not a scientist, so bear with me . . .how do we know for certain that the moon has the same helium stores that earth does? Also, how in the world can that option be any less expensive than getting it from our own atmosphere. Just a couple of thoughts. Thanks again for the great information.
Posted by: Ted Sneebs | December 13, 2010 4:16 PM
First of all, i didnt knew that helium can be in liquid state. This makes me think if helium could be used in cars , as a fuel...
Posted by: Car news | December 14, 2010 8:12 AM
Thanks as I never knew helium came from mining underground. Also, the pockets you speak of quite possibly could be blamed for the BP oil spill, no? SEO Optimisation
Posted by: SEO Optimisation | December 14, 2010 11:45 AM
Thanks as I never knew helium came from mining underground. Also, the pockets you speak of quite possibly could be blamed for the BP oil spill, no? SEO Optimisation
Posted by: SEO Optimisation | December 14, 2010 11:48 AM
helium is so light that it escapes from earth but why dont the hydrogen lighter than helium escape from earth???
Posted by: seo expert | December 15, 2010 2:31 PM
Thanks very much for the post i really didnt know there was so much information on helium! Really enjoyed the read! thanks again
Posted by: Ham Radio | December 18, 2010 4:19 PM
Why can't we just leave it alone? If we use it all we can't use it for further research or better purposes just like oil. We use it all and then we move on, no idea what the consequences are. But who cares where our children have to live, we lived good.
Posted by: Student Loans Without Cosigner | December 18, 2010 11:42 PM
Helium can be stable in specific quantities. I wouldn't feel safe into that kind of balloon-plane though ;] But who would?
Heck, build something safe and then people will board. But I won't risk my life beforehand if I'm not 99.99% sure I'm safe
Posted by: Cable HDMI | December 19, 2010 10:57 AM
I love the way you make things look simple and funny at the same time. I'm by no means a scientist but I read your post from top to bottom and I did get more interested in the applications of Helium and how we're going to deal with things when we're out of it on earth. Thanks for this entertaining article. Hank Reiss from repossessed cars information
Posted by: Hank Reiss | December 20, 2010 4:39 PM
I am not a scientist, so bear with me . . .how do we know for certain that the moon has the same helium stores that earth does? Also, how in the world can that option be any less expensive than getting it from our own atmosphere. life experience degrees
Posted by: alanhawk | December 23, 2010 5:07 AM
Helium on earth is really scarce news for us. I watch the video and now i know why is so scarce.
Posted by: Latest Gadget News | December 27, 2010 12:58 PM
Why can't we just leave it alone? If we use it all we can't use it for further research or better purposes just like oil. We use it all and then we move on, no idea what the consequences are.
Posted by: supratall | December 27, 2010 2:42 PM
The video is quite interesting for those into physics. I believe it's taken from the BBC documentary "Absolute zero". Still don't understand though, why such shortage on earth. I truly believed we had it in large quantities, such as the other gases. Could it be too soon to tell?
Sandro from Italian Pop Music
Posted by: Sandro | December 29, 2010 11:59 AM
"So.... no more helium balloons?
And, if helium is so scarce, why are helium balloons so common?"
Opportunity costs are not accounted for in the helium-balloon production process.
Posted by: Ian | December 29, 2010 3:01 PM
Charlie Lyne is the "12-yr old" co-presenter on the show. But Winkleman got her words a bit mixed up when saying it - the unexpected "I love Charlie, I do" just seemed like an unabashed admission of cocaine abuse!
trading
Posted by: Gibson | January 3, 2011 5:58 AM
Helium is an inert or noble gas from Group 18 of the periodic table. In general, it does not want to bond with anything else. Provillus It exists as a monatomic gas floating around in single-atom
Posted by: bessy | January 6, 2011 5:48 AM
Yeah!, The amount of helium in a tank depends on how big the tank is, the pressure of the helium and its temperature. It is calculated from the ideal gas equation with allowance for compressibility.
Posted by: Bowtrol | January 6, 2011 7:04 AM
Nowadays there are so many threats to our planet, that's why we should do our best to save it.
Posted by: msd 250/2 | January 10, 2011 9:54 AM
First of all, i didnt knew that helium can be in liquid state. This makes me think if helium could be used in cars. Mind you if scarcity is such an issue then it mighjt not be an effective use of resources? http://www.onlineforextradingstrategy.com there's got to be an effective method of manufacturing it though doesn't there? seems that there's a way to mass produce just about everything else nowadays.
Posted by: mcripper | January 12, 2011 9:51 PM
if we run out of helium. there's going to be a lot of baloon vendors heading onto welfare.... http://www.mortgagelasvegasnevada.com/bad-credit-mortgages.php
Posted by: jimm | January 12, 2011 9:53 PM
given the amount of gas used in the hindenberg, and it's catasprohic demise, I think we'd all be wise to look at helium as a resource that should be safeguarded rather than squandered http://www.floridarefinancemortgagerates.com it does seem strange though that it's so much scarcer than other gasses though
Posted by: jimbob | January 12, 2011 9:56 PM
it's not an industrially used gas, so it shouldn't be that big of a deal to most of us, but it's probably critical not to run out or even come close http://www.betterseoservices.com as then you really find out how much it does get used in small quantities.
Posted by: ivegotabiggy | January 12, 2011 9:58 PM
when it comes to applications, a gas that's lighter than the general atmosphere is always going to be handy...and lets not forget the voice-raising side effetcs at parties! http://www.mortgagerefinancelowrate.net gotta save the helium - children around the world demand it!
Posted by: Heidrek | January 12, 2011 10:00 PM
sneaky stuff that helium - i had it pumped up my nose while asleep after a kegger - freaked the heck out of me when I woke up at tried to yell at the a-hole that did it to me! http://www.mortgagebaltimoremaryland.com
Posted by: james the joker | January 12, 2011 10:02 PM
as a resource, there are worse things to be threatened than a lack of helium, but it's still never a good look.
Posted by: mortgage quotes | January 12, 2011 10:39 PM
Thanks - I never knew helium came from mining underground. sseems like it should be the result of a chemical reaction I don't know why exactly i think thats the case, but it just seems to make sense to me for some reason. silly i know
Posted by: michigan mortgage rates | January 12, 2011 10:47 PM
Maybe I've got this completely wrong, but wouldn't photon-photon collisions produce matter/antimatter pairs, not simply matter particles? I think we're running in to an ambiguity of wording between matter as distinct from energy and matter as opposed to antimatter.www.itunes.com
Posted by: kvien | January 15, 2011 4:11 AM
kvien,
I think the terms are just fine but perhaps your understanding of the subject matter is imperfect aluminum cases? you should also check this out:
"Charlie Lyne is the "12-yr old" co-presenter on the show. But Winkleman got her words a bit mixed up when saying it - the unexpected "I love Charlie, I do" just seemed like an unabashed admission of cocaine abuse!"
as far as i can see this bears no relevance to anythig at all.
Posted by: johnathan | January 18, 2011 3:00 PM
Hendrix? How did the original god of guitar get involved in this debate? Jimi was many things but a scientist he was not!
Posted by: jimbo | January 19, 2011 4:05 PM
First of all, i didnt knew that helium can be in liquid state. This makes me think if helium could be used in cars. Mind you if scarcity is such an issue then it mighjt not be an effective use of resources http://www.mortgagelasvegasnevada.comthere's got to be an effective method of manufacturing it or at least replicating it.
Posted by: nick | January 19, 2011 4:08 PM
Hey nick - not there doesn't have to be a way or replicating it, there are plenty of things we cant synthesize, gold for example and many, many other elements. when the http://www.mortgagelasvegasnevada.com helium is gone though it must still remain in the atmosphere, so perhaps it can be recaptured or trapped in some way??
Posted by: jimm | January 19, 2011 4:14 PM
being liquid and colourless at room temperature does make it tough, but there has to be a way or capturing helium gas once it's released? http://www.mortgagedetroitmichigan.com I'd certainly hope so at any rate as otherwise a large concentration of helium in the atmosphere could see us all talking like cartoon characters
Posted by: hhjkjh | January 19, 2011 4:15 PM
Veee! that VHS tape of Steve Martin Wild & Crazy Guy, if you really watch it, when Steve is playing a straight song on the banjo you can see his entire http://www.thetrendystyle.com face, and demeanor change from the rest of the act. Completely different body language.
Posted by: collen | January 20, 2011 7:06 AM
At that time i was also in london and attend this festival. that was first The project uses AudioBoo on the iPhone or iTouch, to enter content to the project, you simply Tag a Boo with ‘audiobooth’
Posted by: audi tt turbo | February 3, 2011 5:46 AM
Well, digging out from underground is not what i was expecting. Really...But your point as to "why it cannot be sucked out from atmosphere" explains and elaborates everything.
Posted by: Sharat Jaswal | February 4, 2011 9:38 PM
Ethan, my man! You make the science all the more interesting. ;)
But you are showing pic of Hindenburg disaster just coz it was filled with hydrogen. Are you forgetting a bigger casualty disaster "USS Akron". I would like mention that USS Akron was filled with helium and nearly all the passengers died.
And Helium is not scarce :p
Posted by: Bialetti | February 4, 2011 9:50 PM
Next to hydrogen, it is the second most abundant element in the universe, and accounts for 24% of the elemental mass of our galaxy. So how can it be scarce???
Posted by: Web Directory | February 7, 2011 9:20 PM
Helium it is not what one would consider a renewable resource as it is lost once released to the atmosphere therefore the government stepped in and created a program to recover helium from natural gas and store the surplus.
Posted by: Venapro | February 9, 2011 3:41 AM
Helium in a tank depends on how big the tank is, the pressure of the helium. http://www.oncanadameds.com/ And its temperature.
Posted by: GregDoc | February 12, 2011 8:57 AM
Many elements of fashion here, but composed rather poorly. Is this all it takes to get my picture taken in Paris? Ironically, I like the sweatpants best.
Posted by: Home Surveillance Cameras | February 13, 2011 2:32 AM
Helium is very important for us, a lot things we can do. The supplies we have on Earth come from radioactive alpha decay in rocks. Right now it’s not commercially viable to recover helium from the air, so we have to rely on extracting it from rocks.
Posted by: Acnezine | February 14, 2011 6:25 AM
I'm by no means a scientist but I read your post from top to bottom and I did get more interested in the applications of Helium
Posted by: Stefan | February 19, 2011 8:33 AM
Maybe I've got this completely wrong, but wouldn't photon-photon collisions produce matter/antimatter pairs, not simply matter particles?
Posted by: Stefan | February 19, 2011 8:35 AM
Very interesting post, extemely well thought out and put together. Keep up the good work.
Posted by: seo manchester | March 14, 2011 4:17 PM
Hi. I think that if more people thought about it that way, they’d have a better time understanding the issue.
Posted by: resveratrol supplements | March 23, 2011 9:39 AM
A lot of interesting facts about helium. You'd think if there was some kind of shortage we'd be seeing a lot less balloons around. It seems like a waste of a useful resource. Then again, humans are a very wasteful species.
Posted by: airline miles credit cards | March 29, 2011 12:37 AM
I didn't know helium was such so useful.
I always thought it was used to make things float (lighter then air) not to help cool magnets in water.
Posted by: Orlando Doctors | April 6, 2011 2:36 PM
Very useful information. I appreciate your effort, very well written article. I believe it's taken from the BBC documentary "Absolute zero". Still don't understand though, why such shortage on earth. I truly believed we had it in large quantities, such as the other gases. Could it be too soon to tell?
Exam Questions
Posted by: Naresh | April 14, 2011 8:13 AM
More linkspam from Naresh above.
Posted by: Wow | April 14, 2011 10:08 AM
BBC documentary "Absolute zero". Still don't understand though, why such shortage on earth. I truly believed we had it in large quantities, such as the other gases. Could it be too soon to tell?
Posted by: electric cigarette | May 6, 2011 8:32 AM
I admire what you have done here. I love the part where you say you are doing this to give back but I would assume by all the comments that is working for you as well. Do you have any more info on this?
Posted by: limousine service Chicago | May 26, 2011 2:27 PM
I think it is fascinating that helium reacts that was, especially after you read how Feynman formulated his theories on it.
Posted by: website design | June 1, 2011 1:22 AM
in my opinion it is not use on "full" power. I guess that there are many other domains where helium can be used.
Posted by: Double glazing repairs Birmingham | June 13, 2011 12:01 PM
Because people can not leave this stuff alone? If we use all that we can use for further studies or better purposses like oil. We use it all and then go ahead, do not know what the consequences. But who cares where our children are forced to live, we lived well.
Posted by: seo expert nepal | June 19, 2011 6:10 AM
Helium in the wrong hands is dangerous, people are just destroying our resources with little thought to what they are doin got our planet or the legacy we are leaving the next generation.
Posted by: oem software download | June 30, 2011 1:42 AM
This was really helpful. Thank you for posting this! I am wondering why they made the program so hard to use if it requires that much work?
Posted by: design to html | July 1, 2011 7:43 AM
This thread is infested with spambots. In fact the only one that might not be a linkspam goes all the way back to 107. 20 continuous spambots.
Posted by: Wow | July 1, 2011 7:56 AM
I'm gonna stock up on helium. You never know when you might need some.
Seriously, Hendrix was wrong. Helium is the 3rd lightest gas in the universe, right behind Hydrogen and the stuff between the ears of lunatic liberals.
Posted by: easy paycheck formula review | July 4, 2011 12:49 AM
Its a shame that this post has been attacked by spam because some interesting points have been made.
Posted by: led modules for signs | July 13, 2011 4:54 PM
It feels really good to know about the mysteries of scarcity of helium gas.Thanks for detailed posting about this gas, it's importance, usage, and threats of abusing or over using of this valuable gas.This inert gas is as light as Hydrogen gas, and it's atom is in second position on the periodic table.
Posted by: hamster cages | August 8, 2011 11:46 AM
What a nice article that i'm sure students get ideas from it.
Posted by: Srixon | August 21, 2011 5:55 AM
I read from somewhere that First, Helium does not chemically combine with other elements.
Second, Helium is a very light weight (low density) gas that tends to rise in the atmosphere and eventually escape from the gravitational field of the Earth.
Last, there are very few sources for the production of Helium. Some radioactive elements release Alpha particles which eventually become Helium atoms after capturing electrons.
Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_is_helium_so_rare_on_earth#ixzz1VwOppNyP
Posted by: Khalifa | August 24, 2011 6:28 AM
Is it dangerous to inhale helium? I remember when I was a child, we used to breathe the helium from balloons and then talk like Daffy Duck and laugh our foolish heads off.
Anyone else do this too?
Posted by: gold and silver buyers houston | August 28, 2011 8:48 PM
Indeed, it is nice compilation and I will use this one in my presentation. I am really like the way it was written. I am also thankful that I was able to check this site.
Posted by: meladerm review | September 7, 2011 6:36 AM
Indeed, it is nice article and I will use this one in my documentation. I am really like the way it was written. I am also thankful that I was able to find this site.
Posted by: meladerm review | September 7, 2011 6:47 AM
And to think i was gonna try and build myself a private airship. :l well this certainly put me out. :l
Posted by: Josh Gibson | October 12, 2011 4:52 PM