Origin Of LIGO's Merging Black Holes Finally Discovered! (Synopsis)

"Black holes can bang against space-time as mallets on a drum and have a very characteristic song." -Janna Levin

If you had told an astrophysicist five years ago that binary black holes were common, that would’ve been news, but not surprising. If you had told them that ~30 solar masses was a good estimate for each one of their masses, though, you might have had to pick their jaws up off the floor. Yet LIGO’s very first detection showed us exactly that, much to the surprise of many.

The inspiral and merger of the first pair of black holes ever directly observed. Image credit: B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration). The inspiral and merger of the first pair of black holes ever directly observed. Image credit: B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration).

So how did these black holes come to be? After much numerical study, it appears that young, metal-poor stars about 40-100 solar masses each conspired to create these binary black hole pairs, with only one of the members resulting in a supernova. The rest is cosmic history.

Artist's impression of two merging black holes, with accretion disks. The density and energy of the matter here is woefully insufficient to create gamma ray or X-ray bursts. Image credit: NASA / Dana Berry (Skyworks Digital). Artist's impression of two merging black holes, with accretion disks. The density and energy of the matter here is woefully insufficient to create gamma ray or X-ray bursts. Image credit: NASA / Dana Berry (Skyworks Digital).

Come see what the latest results indicate, and what it means for future black hole detection prospects over on Forbes today!

More like this

In this close supermassive binary scenario, the heavier star (A)
goes SN, and then strips the outer layers off the companion B. Now supposedly B collapses more or less directly into a BH. Which one ends up as the heavier BH? A because it was more massive, or B because the collapse is more efficient?

By Omega Centauri (not verified) on 23 Jun 2016 #permalink

In this close supermassive binary scenario, the heavier star (A) goes SN....

With the caveat that the Forbes blockade is so broken that I can't pass Go regardless, no, if the subject is this, there are no SNe involved. (I also wouldn't call that a "discovery," but like I said, I can't see the original.)

I think Ethan's headline is a bit misleading. Most people would understand "origin" as meaning "point in space", or at least "direction".
What he has claimed as "origin", is in fact a theoretical discussion of the sort of object which could have produced the waves.
Please don't associate me with you know who...I'm just suggesting there should be strict objectivity in discussing these things..

By Peter Dugdale (not verified) on 02 Jul 2016 #permalink