A Perfect Universe: could it have been born completely uniform? (Synopsis)

“First, you should check out my house. It’s, like, kinda lame, but way less lame than, like, your house.” -Lumpy Space Princess, Adventure Time

Billions of years ago, before the Universe contained clusters, galaxies, stars or even neutral atoms, everything was uniform. Almost perfectly uniform, where the densest regions weren’t even 0.01% denser than average. Over billions of years, those overdense regions have attracted more and more matter and grown under the influence of gravity.

Both simulations (red) and galaxy surveys (blue/purple) display the same large-scale clustering patterns. Image credit: Gerard Lemson & the Virgo Consortium, via http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/millennium/. Both simulations (red) and galaxy surveys (blue/purple) display the same large-scale clustering patterns. Image credit: Gerard Lemson & the Virgo Consortium, via http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/millennium/.

By today, we have the incredible rich, clumpy, structured Universe we exist in. But what about a more perfect Universe, one that was totally uniform? Could that have given rise to us? And if not, what is the limiting factor? It’s a fascinating question, and one science can answer.

Fluctuations on various scales give rise to the structure we see on various scales. Without imperfections, there's nothing to grow. Image credit: NASA / WMAP science team. Fluctuations on various scales give rise to the structure we see on various scales. Without imperfections, there's nothing to grow. Image credit: NASA / WMAP science team.

Come get the full story on the idea of a perfect Universe, and learn the most valuable cosmic lesson of all: sometimes our imperfections are necessary for the best outcomes of all.

More like this

“First, you should check out my house. It’s, like, kinda lame, but way less lame than, like, your house.” -Lumpy Space Princess, Adventure Time When you visualize our Universe today, you probably think about the great clumps of matter -- planets, stars, galaxies and clusters -- separated by huge…
"You must learn to talk clearly. The jargon of scientific terminology which rolls off your tongues is mental garbage." -Martin H. Fischer I've always thought that the Universe is absolutely amazing; that everything from the tiniest indivisible particles all the way up to the largest structures and…
"Space and time may have a structure as intricate as the fauna of a rich ecosystem, but on a scale far larger than the horizon of our observations." -Martin Rees On the largest scales, dark matter has been undoubtedly the most successful theory in modern cosmology for explaining a huge variety of…
"Science progresses best when observations force us to alter our preconceptions." -Vera Rubin I want you to think about the Universe. The whole thing; about everything that physically exists, both visible and invisible, about the laws of nature that they obey, and about your place in it. It's a…

I remember reading one of the Feynman Lectures on Physics, where Richard Feynman mentions: “…the true explanation of the near symmetry of nature is this: that God made the laws only nearly symmetrical so that we should not be jealous of His perfection!”

And it turns out that asymmetry is actually the origin of all creation. If the laws of the universe were perfectly symmetrical the universe would be empty.

By Anonymous Coward (not verified) on 16 Dec 2016 #permalink

@Ethan wrote

While cosmic inflation stretches the Universe flat it also stretches the quantum fluctuations of empty space across the Universe itself, imprinting density/energy fluctuations on the fabric of spacetime.

Does the Axis of Evil indicate a bias in quantum fluctuations?

The Universe was very, very uniform on average in its early days, where departures from perfect uniformity were only 0.003% or so.

Why, that's almost as flat as the Earth's surface! :)

Yeah, sorry, AC, Feynman didn't think that isotropy proved god. Because your elision starts "We might like to turn the idea around and think that..." and then your quote.

BAD DOG.

Why does he presume that dark energy would have the exact same value in this hypothetical universe as it does in ours?

By Michael Hutson (not verified) on 23 Dec 2016 #permalink