Please Note! ScienceBlogs is taking a break while we upgrade the system. Read on for more...

Stoat

Taking science by the throat...

Search

Profile

Me I am a Dragon. I emerge from my Egg. More...

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

Co-moderator of globalchange mailing list Subscribe to globalchange
Email:
Browse at groups.google.com
I've been using Google Reader recently, following the lamented death of Planet Fleck, and I suppose I have to admit its better. Here are some "shared items" if, for some reason, you want to read what I read.

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« UK fuel prices | Main | Only in America... »

A "balanced" conference?

Category: climate fun
Posted on: March 15, 2006 6:18 PM, by William M. Connolley

RP Sr is advertising a "balanced" climate meeting. And why is he so confident of balance? Well, check out the list of organisers and speakers. You could play bingo with them :-).

And if that isn't enough, good ol' Sonja A.Boehmer-Christiansen offers in the comment to publish the results... with friends like that...

TrackBacks

(TrackBack URL for this entry: )

Comments

Now, Wm of Borg, you know how important it is to give equal time to both sides. It's how our Corporate MediaTM plays ball over here. Please play by the rules. We must give equal time to the tinfoil hatters to hear their views. Please play by the rules. Resistance is futile.

Best,

D of Borg (assimilated)

Posted by: Dano | March 16, 2006 12:24 PM

Well, there does seem to be at least a scattering of credible "consensus" scientists involved. And I suppose it's fair enough to have an event like this that gives the outliers some kind of forum. But Veizer and Brekke and Essex, oh my.

On the plus side, no Soon or Baliunas so far.

(Dano -- Our corporate media? You mean the one that's been assimilated by Rupert Murdoch? I seem to recall that Blighty has received more than its fair share of that action. But speaking of RM, I always like to quote Harry Shearer when his name comes up: "I used to maintain that (the Simpsons') existence was the one reason not to revoke 'citizen' Rupert's right to plunder this country as his own. Now I'm not so sure.")

Posted by: Steve Bloom | March 16, 2006 2:41 PM

I'm sure Singer was disappointed that his presentation materials weren't accepted.

I have friends, Steve, who swear by the wisdom imparted by The Simpsons. I don't own a TV, so I can't verify.

Best,

D

Posted by: Dano | March 16, 2006 8:03 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting?

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Readers' Picks