Seed Media Group

Stoat

Taking science by the throat...

Search this blog

Profile

Me I am a Dragon. I emerge from my Egg. More...

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

Co-moderator of globalchange mailing list Subscribe to globalchange
Email:
Browse at groups.google.com
I've been using Google Reader recently, following the lamented death of Planet Fleck, and I suppose I have to admit its better. Here are some "shared items" if, for some reason, you want to read what I read.

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« Today is Jedi day! | Main | US govt leaks IPCC report »

Model projections of the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation for the 21st century assessed by observations

Category: climate science
Posted on: May 4, 2006 9:59 AM, by William M. Connolley

This is about "Model projections of the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation for the 21st century assessed by observations" by A. Schmittner, M. Latif, and B. Schneider (here if you have a GRL subscription). Its interesting for two reasons: another data point on the "will the THC shutdown" (no); and because of the way it weights multiple AR4 models.

What they are interested in is the size and probability of a THC slowdown over the coming century. To do this they look at 9 models (some with multiple realisations) from the AR4 archive under SRES A1B. The end result is a weakening of the THC from about 16 to about 12 Sv. They don't say what that does to the temperature, but I think it still leaves warming over Europe.

More interesting to me is the weighting thing: they compare various variables in the models to obs climatology, form a skill score, and then weight the models contribution to the final result by W=exp(-0.5S^2). Weights then vary from 0.04 (ie, almost thrown out) to 2.75 (used). This is a Good Thing to do, because some of the models are not really very good, and just averaging them unweighted fails to reflect this. OTOH, they do point out that the mean result is pretty similar, weighted or not, though the uncertainty range is less for the weighted models.

TrackBacks

(TrackBack URL for this entry: )

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting?

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Most German