Please Note! ScienceBlogs is taking a break while we upgrade the system. Read on for more...

Stoat

Taking science by the throat...

Search

Profile

Me I am a Dragon. I emerge from my Egg. More...

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

Co-moderator of globalchange mailing list Subscribe to globalchange
Email:
Browse at groups.google.com
I've been using Google Reader recently, following the lamented death of Planet Fleck, and I suppose I have to admit its better. Here are some "shared items" if, for some reason, you want to read what I read.

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« Leaking of AR4 precedented | Main | Lee Raymond retires with stonking payoff »

Pix of retreating Swiss glaciers

Category: climate science
Posted on: June 1, 2006 3:31 PM, by William M. Connolley

Swisseduc.ch has some nice pix of retreating glaciers over the last 30-odd years. No, its not *proof* of GW, of course; just more evidence in the same direction.

TrackBacks

(TrackBack URL for this entry: )

Comments

Just playing DA for fun, but would a lengthening glacier also be "evidence in the same direction" too (more precip and all that).

[I suppose I'm actually wondering how credible the model forecasts are on the precip/ablation balance generally, and on how well they agree with detailed regional obs.]

[I'm sure we could fudge it if we tried... as I recall, the few lengthening glaciers (Norge?) tend to be explicitly explained by inc ppn; no-one tries to explain the shortening ones by dec ppn. P-abl: GCM P might be reliable, ish, at the larger scales; but ablation would need downscaling to be useful, I would have though. Even around Gr/Ant -W]

Posted by: James Annan | June 1, 2006 4:48 PM

Another DA point... I didn't see if the pics were taken at the same time of the year. Maybe I missed it on their site, but it would make a huge difference if one pic was taken in January, and the other in August. It doesn't seem from the tenor of the web page that they would do this intentionally, it is just that I was surprised that more attention was given to the way they took the photos in order to line them up than was given to making sure an apples-to-apples comparison was made.

Personally, I think this effect is likely real. I would just like to see more rigorous studies done.

Posted by: Todd Smith | June 1, 2006 6:27 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting?

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Most German