I’m wondering a bit if I took Prof Wegmans credentials a bit too much on faith.
A commenter on the previous post wrote I’m not too knocked out by Wegman’s credentials as a prof at George Mason U, nor do I think he, who was leader of Reagan’s idiotic “Star Wars Program”, could be seen as an impartial, unbiased person. Sounds like the psycho Republicans like Barton are just calling on the old white guy network…. Is this fair? Was Wegman really leader of Star Wars? (only a bit; still that looks like a reasonably impressive CV).
The NRC people do seem to have had impeccable credentials. So what about WSS? One of WSS is Scott, whose publication list looks rather thin to me (he may just have let it get out of date?). But I’m not so good at interpreting credentials of statisticians.
Does anyone out there have any good links, and/or anything to say?
Oh, and before you start off on the obvious “you should judge their report, not their credentials” – I have, in the prev post. And it looks like a regurgitation of M&M, with some climate mistakes thrown in. The only reason to take them seriously is their credentials.
UUpdate: he traces his descent from Hermite
UUUpdate: Said was Wegman's student at George Mason, there are lots of rightwing policy types at George Mason which houses Fred Singer's SEPP among other things says EliR at Deltoid
UUUUpdate: James Annan has a snarky aside about a mistake that all the "auditing" by stats "experts" has failed to pick up... (third-to-last para)]