Seed Media Group

Stoat

Taking science by the throat...

Search this blog

Profile

Me I am a Dragon. I emerge from my Egg. More...

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

Co-moderator of globalchange mailing list Subscribe to globalchange
Email:
Browse at groups.google.com
I've been using Google Reader recently, following the lamented death of Planet Fleck, and I suppose I have to admit its better. Here are some "shared items" if, for some reason, you want to read what I read.

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« Draft AMS statement on climate change | Main | Brief Holiday »

Nairobi - what is it good for?

Category: climate opinion
Posted on: November 19, 2006 3:57 PM, by William M. Connolley

I mean, of course, the recent UNFCCC conference, not the city. There is a very negative BBC report. It seems to me that this is one of those scheduled meetings that has to be held even though nothing will come of it other than a pile of CO2 emitted by the delegates.

So... does anyone have a good word to say for it?

TrackBacks

(TrackBack URL for this entry: )

Comments

The snark was excellent

Posted by: Eli Rabett | November 19, 2006 4:50 PM

HAHA, Lubos once again is preaching the Inhofe screed, good god. Plenty of greenhouse gases given off by Repuke voters, their bovine flatulence, and & wars? ;-)

Posted by: Carl Christensen | November 21, 2006 10:45 AM

I've just now realized that the scary picture the Noise Machine uses to marginalize scientists - priest-like, robed - is based on big-ego acting like what Lubos does in comments.

Best,

D

Posted by: Danø | November 21, 2006 4:07 PM

Well yes, it is the mainline of human advance. Riddled with contradictions, beset by liars and rogues, "...going here and then again there with nothing before them but the mists, and they rolling down the bog...." (O'Casey). What would you prefer, 5 minutes of Bush; 5 hours of any cluster of national politicians you may name. It really does seem hopeless until you consider the alternatives. Did Churchill say something like that? Why are you talking about Stern except to persuade, a little, at least a few members of that audience.
I am afraid it is the best we can do at the moment. Check again in a century or two, maybe we will get better at this civilisation thing. Meanwhile RJP is not part of the mainline or any advance.

Posted by: garhane | November 22, 2006 12:31 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting?

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Readers' Picks