I have a guest post over at Ellee Seymour‘s blog. Its an attempt at explaining TGGWS for more political type folks.
Meanwhile The Independent has an article on the faked graphs; sadly the online version hasn’t got the pix.
William, thank you for the post, and it’s helpful to see the graph too.
Well, I hope you’re thoroughly ashamed of yourself, because according to Ch4 it’s just not fair to point out when scientists are fudging their data.
Interesting to note that besides the U-tube copies, Russell Seitz is now hosting a copy of this broadcast personally. I don’t have the intestinal fortitude to go see which version he’s providing.
It’ll be interesting to see how this spreads. I’m afraid this is the future —- video’s most convincing to people who don’t read for information.
I suppose those distributing copies have decided to violate the copyright law in a higher cause — or was the program put into public domain?
Probably best to stick your fingers in your ears when Durkin hears about this – The Now Show 16/3/07 BBC Radio 4
“video’s most convincing to people who don’t read for information.”
It would be good to see a decent science programme do a “Fundamentals Of Climate Change” or even a version of Spencer Weart’s book (or David Archer’s or Houghton’s or a mix). I know there’s AIT, but something with climate scientist talking heads and proper graphs etc. would look very good. It might need to be a multi-parter which wouldn’t help. I don’t know if Horizon or Equinox (does that still exist?) would be up to the job.
I’ve watched maybe a dozen hours of TV in the past six months, so am not exactly up to speed, but I am sure that Equinox is gone, and there are few science based programs on TV. They’d rather do something about archeology.
Adam: Attenborough did an excellent two parter “Are we changing Planet Earth?” It was broadcasted on CBC Newsworld as “The Truth About Global Warming”. Small clips here:
I would suspect that BBC’s Horizon unit is already preparing a response. They always like to debunk any crap that C4 outputs.
The Indie graphs you mentioned:
It would be excellent to see a excellent scientific disciplines program do a “Fundamentals Of Environment Change” or even a edition of Spencer Weart’s publication (or Mark Archer’s or Houghton’s or a mix).
New comments have been temporarily disabled. Please check back soon.
The Economist, about Ted Cruz, in an article about his presidential hopes:
Conversely his appeal to…
Pattern Recognition in Physics (or, if you prefer, Pattern Recognition in Physics) appears to have…
Except, of course, it is actually the same recycled nutters under yet another name. Thanks to…
Brian said I’d guess 100 or so draft posts sitting around, forlornly. I have precisely 89…
On of the things I used to hate when I was in the game was…