Seed Media Group

Stoat

Taking science by the throat...

Search this blog

Profile

Me I am a Dragon. I emerge from my Egg. More...

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

Co-moderator of globalchange mailing list Subscribe to globalchange
Email:
Browse at groups.google.com
I've been using Google Reader recently, following the lamented death of Planet Fleck, and I suppose I have to admit its better. Here are some "shared items" if, for some reason, you want to read what I read.

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« The adventures of half-hitch Holland | Main | What level CO2 is "dangerous"? »

The inherent contradictions of greenyness

Category: climate communication
Posted on: March 5, 2007 3:28 PM, by William M. Connolley

In the course of Why Channel 4 has got it wrong over climate change Robin McKie says:

The Observer's travel desk already gets hate mail merely for highlighting interesting destinations that might seem to encourage carbon-producing air travel

Well no. Without condoning the hate mail (which probably isn't) the grauniad and observer frequently (almost always) runs travel sections on places you can only plausibly get to by air. They do this because their readers want them to. They run these alongside articles bemoaning the rise of CO2 from air travel. Its a contradiction they would do better admitting than try to pretend away.

TrackBacks

(TrackBack URL for this entry: )

Comments

William, is 'greenyness' (greeniness?) another coining drawing on the Colbert Rule (ie based on the 'truthiness' model)? Is it yours? (Colbertiness-spotting has become a minor hobby of mine...)

[I made it up myself -W]

Posted by: outeast | March 6, 2007 4:42 AM

Mr or Ms Robin McKie didn't notice one key detail about the "conspiracies": in the case of the global warming, it is the alarmists who are the conspiracy theorists and who argue that a conspiracy of humans is going to create something really big.

A person who doesn't believe conspiracy theories and who prefers a rational and natural explanation is normally called a skeptic.

Posted by: Lubos Motl | March 7, 2007 4:45 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting?

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Most Active

  1. Surprise! McCain doesn't persuade me to switch my vote with his VP choice 08.29.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. Initial Thoughts on Sarah Pallin 08.29.2008 · Ed Brayton
  3. Maybe Palin Does Have the Experience 08.29.2008 · Ed Brayton
  4. They're joking, right? 08.28.2008 · PZ Myers
  5. OEC & YEC>IDC 08.29.2008 · ERV