Kevin Vrames at Climate feedback has a nice post on a perverse-incentive problem with one part of the CDM. Which is one small part of the reason I don’t buy any offsetting at the moment.
Good to know. But what about the CDM gold standard ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDM_Gold_Standard )? Doesn’t that rule out such a thing?
If you don’t have a subsription to nature, you’ll find Wara’s arguments laid out very nicely in the above link.
Even more information (and yes the Gold Standard is addressed as well):
In case Nils doesn’t want to spend the 10 hours or so I have reading a fair fraction of what’s in these links, the most detailed information on the CDM Gold Standard is in
Just search for Gold Standard (you’ll find 20 mentions), alternatively read pages 182 and following, and 296 and following.
Hey Heiko, thanks for all the information. As far as I can tell now, the CDM Gold Standard does not have the CFC-problem, but has to be seen as a niche which will likely not be capable to take a bigger share, which was the only way to give at least some sense to the whole CDM. Furthermore, there are Gold Standard projects which are being carried out without consent of the local community.
The site is currently under maintenance and will be back shortly. New comments have been disabled during this time, please check back soon.
Its at The Conversation and a retweet near you, no doubt. By
Yay, more fallout. Need I say more? Oh go on then:
This is a complete fabrication…. I…
Ah, there’s nothing like pouring oil on troubled waters with a carefully chosen post title,…
Next: Mullerhutte to Nurnberger
Having got to the Mullerhutte I finally had a chance to climb the…
Via sekrit, in the Journal of Science Communication, comes a deeply flawed article, Science blogging: an…