Guess who has finally admitted my conclusions on the role of humans on global warming, and climate change, in general, are mistaken.
Comments
-
#1 Duae Quartunciae 2007/12/17
Someone admitted that your conclusions are mistaken?
-
#2 Alexander Ač 2007/12/17
No, I think William has RP Sr in mind.. ;-)
-
#3 Luboš Motl 2007/12/17
[linkspam removed -W]
-
#4 Steve Bloom 2007/12/17
It seems to be getting more and more common for anonymous septics to invent scientific credentials in an effort to enhance their credibility, as with our friend DR above. It’s a sign of progress.
-
#5 Dano 2007/12/17
That RP Sr quote from his Drought 2002 in Colorado – An unprecedented drought or a routine drought? in Pure Appl. Geophys., is the passage I’m using in one of my plans at my new place on the Front Range, to justify lower water use. It’s a good paper.
Best,
D
[Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying his work is wrong - most of it is good -W]
-
#6 Avfuktare Vind Krypgrund 2007/12/18
Sorry, I cannot see where R Pielke Sr has changed his mind? Isn’t this what he has been saying for years? Can you explain what you are refering to?
[Isn't "my conclusions on the role of humans on global warming, and climate change, in general, are mistaken" clear enough? -W]
-
#7 Cymraeg llygoden 2007/12/18
Avfuktare, think ‘Freudian slip’!
-
#8 Hank Roberts 2007/12/18
Being misquoted is the same thing as being mistaken, like, mistaken for someone else.
You have to be vewy, vewy cwevver to follow the logic.
-
#9 Sean Pelette 2007/12/19
Its a poorly worded sentence. He is correcting the mistaken view attributed to him;
“Pielke argues that climate models overstate the role humans play in warming the globe”.
His real view is;
“The climate models understate the role that humans play in warming…”
[Ahem. I think you are missing the joke. Of course its a poorly worded sentence. Did you really think that I thought that RP had recented? -W]
