Please Note! ScienceBlogs is taking a break while we upgrade the system. Read on for more...
Taking science by the throat...
I am a Dragon. I emerge from my Egg. More...
| Co-moderator of globalchange mailing list | Subscribe to globalchange |
| Browse at groups.google.com | |
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« Ergs | Main | Clowns to the left of me... »
Category: climate science?
Posted on: December 5, 2007 5:03 PM, by William M. Connolley
Those anxiously awaiting my detailed reply to RP's reply to my reply to RP's attack on the IPCC are doomed to disappointment. I'm afraid its fallen into the lifes-too-short category.
In summary: RP has forgotten the T^4 radiative feedback; and the IPCC figure is a difference from 1750.
Now, who to vote for, or against?
Send this entry to:
Email this entry to a friend
View the Technorati Link Cosmos for this entry
(TrackBack URL for this entry: )
YES! Send me a free issue of Seed.
If I like what I see, I'll receive 5 more issues (6 in all) for just $19.95. If I'm not completely satisfied, I'll simply write "cancel" on the invoice and owe nothing. The free issue is mine to keep.
(Non-U.S. subscribers, click here.)
Comments
>vote
Advice welcome, on that, I'm guessing none of them are you?
[Oh no, I have no time... -W]
Posted by: Hank Roberts | December 5, 2007 6:03 PM
nice, make a drive by and then plead incompetence
[A self referential comment, how sweet -W]
Posted by: windansea | December 5, 2007 9:16 PM
I see that RPs still has his comments turned off. How convenient!
William, all the best in your new career!
From a friend across the pond.
Posted by: WVhybrid | December 6, 2007 8:08 PM
William - I am disappointed. Restating your misinterpretation of my weblog does not add to the scientific discussion of the issues I raised.
In any case, best wishes for the Holidays! Roger
[Nor does your restatement of your original point. I fear we shall have to agree to disagree over this. Festive wishes to you & your family too -W]
Posted by: Roger A. Pielke Sr. | December 7, 2007 11:47 AM
WVhybrid, think asymmetric blogfare.
Posted by: Eli Rabett | December 7, 2007 8:36 PM
Roger, that's mighty bold talk for someone who's turned off the comments on his blog. You got plenty of scientific response when you had them turned on. Going forward, of course there will be less interest in responding to your material since most of those reading your website won't see the responses.
While it's true that you also got a lot of noise in the comments, that's mainly because you kept encouraging those denialist fanboyz.
Posted by: Steve Bloom | December 8, 2007 5:22 PM
[A reminder to people that politeness is required -W]
Posted by: windansea | December 9, 2007 12:04 PM