Is Fred Singer worth listening to(o)? It sounds unlikely - certainly when I heard him speak he provided nothing but disinformation. Sadly I may never know for sure, because their site was broken when I tried it. If anyone does manage to find Singer saying anything worth hearing, do let me know what is was...
Stoat
Taking science by the throat...
Profile
My family and me.
More...
Make sure you're familiar with the Comment Policy
Search
Recent Posts
- Yet more snarking
- First Look at Carbon Capture and Storage in a West Virginia Coal-Fired Power Plant?
- Wadhams on sea ice
- Fireworks
- Tiljander, again
- Corbyn again
- Oh no! More snarking
- The seminal Myles Allen
- Ash-man and Teslathon
- Tiljander
Recent Comments
- Hank Roberts on Yet more snarking
- carrot eater on Yet more snarking
- Boris on Yet more snarking
- Deep Climate on Yet more snarking
- Nathan on Wildfires and global warming
- Ted Nordhaus on Yet more snarking
- carrot eater on Yet more snarking
- Brian Schmidt on Oh no! More snarking
- Hank Roberts on Tiljander, again
- Hank Roberts on Oh no! More snarking
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
Blogroll
- Back Seat Driving
- Bryan's Blog
- CIP
- Climate Feedback (Nature)
- QS/DA
- Deltoid
- Eli t Rabett
- FPA: climate change
- Framing Science
- Jeb
- John Fleck
- Only In It For The Gold
- Reality Check
- Real Climate
- RP Sr
- RP Jr
- Sagredo
- Some are Boojums
Other Information
| Co-moderator of globalchange mailing list | Subscribe to globalchange |
| Browse at groups.google.com | |
« Why is climate modelling stuck? | Main | Dr Stoat »
Jumping the shark?
Category: climate communication
Posted on: January 17, 2008 2:30 PM, by William M. Connolley
Find more posts in: 
Environment
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/61612
Comments
Hansen, head of GISS, studied under James Van Allen, NAS member.
Vs.
Singer "best known as President and founder (in 1990) of the Science & Environmental Policy Project, which disputes the prevailing scientific views of climate change, ozone depletion, and secondhand smoke and is science advisor to the conservative journal NewsMax."
I don't get it?
Posted by: JonSnow | January 17, 2008 11:36 PM
Ah yes, dear old S. Fred...
O gee, and here I was reading one of old S. Fred's book
and what do I come across.....
*********************ISBN90 277 0385 X
pp5: I am persuaded to think that any climate change is bad because of the investments and adaptations that have been made by human beings and all of the things that support human existence upon this globe. Even minor fluctuations of climate could change the distribution of fish, ... upset
agriculture,...and inundate costal cities...... Such changes could occur at a faster rate perhaps than human society can evolve.
****************************
He goes on in a similar vein.
The old boy probably goes around stealing the book from every library
["I am persuaded to think that..." is such pleasant old-fashioned cautious language, too -W]
Posted by: Eli Rabett | January 18, 2008 12:03 AM
Many thanks for the opportunity to add Golly Gee Wilikers.
Posted by: Eli Rabett | January 18, 2008 2:57 PM
The funniest part is that publication, "Global Effects of Environmental Pollution" (and its various editions), was the basis for the '75 NAS report's aerosol and CO2 comparison (J. Murray Mitchel's paper). That's the one that Singer said contained "hysterical fear."
Let's hear from Singer, circa 1970:
http://cce.890m.com/epilogue.jpg
I don't know about you guys, but my irony meter (or is it hypocrisy meter?) exploded after reading that.
Posted by: cce | January 18, 2008 10:44 PM
There is one precious quote by F. Singer: "Climate models are unreliable" ;-)
Posted by: Alexander Ač | January 19, 2008 7:54 AM
On 'The Great Global Warming Swindle' Singer was introduced as 'former Head of the National Weather Bureau' - which of course he never was. This is currently one of a number of complaints to OFCOM, who have said they will issue a ruling in the first quarter of this year. Singer himself has done nothing to set the record straight of course.
Of course there is the oft-cited claim than in 1962 Singer was the 'Head of the National Weather Satellite Service'. A google search for that organisation only ever gives links that ultimately derive from his own CV.
It seems that even this claim is in some doubt - a poster on this blog made the following remark:
http://tinyurl.com/38jy7d
"veritas36
December 15, 2007 at 4:49 am
Although Ol' Fred lists himself as the
"founding director of the U.S. National Weather Satellite Service" or
"first Director of the National Weather Satellite Service (1962-64)"
the NOAA web page:
http://preserveamerica.noaa.gov/week06/johnson_pioneer.html
lists David Simonds Johnson as
"Johnson was the founding director of the National Weather Satellite Center and directed its successors, the National Environmental Satellite Service and the NOAA National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service."
I actually remember Ol' Fred took an administrative position at NOAA at about that time; but more of a branch head -- I suspect subordinate to Johnson. I am wondering if there isn't some resume inflation going on."
Is Fred keeping his head down so as not to draw attention to the original claim on his CV? - anyone have any idea as to the truth behind his claim??
Posted by: Dean Morrison | January 20, 2008 10:32 AM