Taking science by the throat...
I am a Dragon. I emerge from my Egg. More...
| Co-moderator of globalchange mailing list | Subscribe to globalchange |
| Browse at groups.google.com | |
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« For reference | Main | Tipping point watch »
Category: photo
Posted on: February 5, 2008 5:30 PM, by William M. Connolley
Is a photo essay I bought years ago and rarely looked at. I was going to get rid of it, but then flicking through I came across this wonderful picture.
It looks like some bizarre sci-fi drawing, but is in fact a prototype numclear-powered jet engine. Read more about it at nuclearfiles.org, which has the full set of piccies from the book, but I think I got the exposure better on mine.
Send this entry to:
Email this entry to a friend
View the Technorati Link Cosmos for this entry
(TrackBack URL for this entry: )
YES! Send me a free issue of Seed.
If I like what I see, I'll receive 5 more issues (6 in all) for just $14.95. That's 50% off the cover price! If I'm not completely satisfied, I'll simply write "cancel" on the invoice and owe nothing. The free issue is mine to keep.
(Non-U.S. subscribers, click here.)
Comments
Wow, the West was pretty rich at that times... I thought it was a 18th century train wagon.
Posted by: Luboš Motl | February 6, 2008 1:46 AM
In what way is a nuclear powered jet engine on a train not bizarre sci-fi? I mean, aside from the fact that it was actually real? It's right up there with radium health tonics...
[Weeeeelllll it was a serious project, they spent an entirely non-fictional $1B on it, and even flew the reactor in a plane (though not for power) -W]
Posted by: Dunc | February 6, 2008 5:37 AM
The technology and politics of aircraft nuclear propulsion.
Posted by: P. Lewis | February 6, 2008 9:06 AM
Interesting. However, I can find no mention of what is probably the single most important factor in aircraft engine design - power to weight ratio. Plus there's the interesting question of what happens if you fly it into a mountain...
They spent a stupid amount of money on remote viewing too.
Posted by: Dunc | February 7, 2008 11:40 AM
Perhaps that was what they were going to spend the second billion dollars on! :-)
Posted by: P. Lewis | February 7, 2008 12:13 PM
"Plus there's the interesting question of what happens if you fly it into a mountain..."
They probably assumed it would be a Soviet mountain. Maybe they hoped that would happen, in a sort of cross between Dr Strangelove & "Fade Out"?
(Fade Out is a novel by Patrick Tilley).
Posted by: Adam | February 8, 2008 5:29 AM
Oooh, that is a bit of a beastie! Whatever's the point of such an engine though? It hardly looks like the most economical of propulsion systems!
Posted by: a very public sociologist | February 13, 2008 10:47 AM
A former boss of mine worked on such projects for GE in the 60s. The goal was to build a plane that never had to land.
Interesting. However, I can find no mention of what is probably the single most important factor in aircraft engine design - power to weight ratio.
The weight of the reactor may have been solvable. The mass of the shielding was not.
Posted by: Jay Alt | February 24, 2008 2:03 AM