Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Stoat

Taking science by the throat... climate, rowing, and misc.

Profile

Me My family and me. More...

Make sure you're familiar with the Comment Policy

Confused by my constant use of abbreviations? Then you need the Glossary

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

Co-moderator of globalchange mailing list Subscribe to globalchange
Email:
Browse at groups.google.com
I've been using Google Reader recently, following the lamented death of Planet Fleck, and I suppose I have to admit its better. Here are some "shared items" if, for some reason, you want to read what I read.

« Short term temperature trends | Main | Don't believe a word of it, guv »

BUFAPOPO

Category: fun
Posted on: April 13, 2008 5:40 PM, by William M. Connolley

Do you realise that bufapopo doesn't get a single google hit? Its outrageous. Badger would be appalled.

[Seems pretty clear that youre not going to get it, so I'll have to tell you. Read on...]

[Yes, the answer is "bearing an unsympathetic facial aspect in the presence of a police officer"; catch-all crime used by Chief Constable Badger Courage of If... fame. I'm ashamed of you all -W]

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/69445

Comments

1

The what?

Posted by: Naadir Jeewa | April 13, 2008 6:19 PM

2

Someone :-) will post the definition to Wikipedia, I trust.

As I understand it, the word means "self-negating observation."

Kind of like what happens when a boojum looks in a mirror.

Posted by: Hank Roberts | April 13, 2008 7:00 PM

3

Isn't Bufapopo the genus designation of the Harlequin Toad?

Posted by: HP | April 13, 2008 7:53 PM

4

Well, that's what I get for trying to make a lame taxonomy joke on a science blog. (I was going for a bad pun on the italian buffo and Popo the Clown.) There really are harlequin toads.

Next time I'll google before hitting Post.

Posted by: HP | April 13, 2008 8:00 PM

5

Hey, wasn't I right? Just by happenstance, I admit, but isn't making faces at an arresting officer a sure way to lose face fast?

[Perhaps a bit too cryptic to count -W]

Posted by: Hank Roberts | April 16, 2008 9:37 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.