Now on ScienceBlogs: Publishers Weekly Cover Girl: Rebecca Skloot and The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks (HeLa)

Seed Media Group

Stoat

Taking science by the throat...

Profile

Me My family and me. More...

Make sure you're familiar with the Comment Policy

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

Co-moderator of globalchange mailing list Subscribe to globalchange
Email:
Browse at groups.google.com
I've been using Google Reader recently, following the lamented death of Planet Fleck, and I suppose I have to admit its better. Here are some "shared items" if, for some reason, you want to read what I read.

« Yes, they are mad | Main | Nierenberg, chapter 3 and 4 »

Barack Obama for President?

Category: politics
Posted on: October 30, 2008 6:24 PM, by William M. Connolley

Says Seed. CIP said that a while ago, but less politely. I'd prefer Obama, but I don't have a vote. Looks like the money is on Obama: 1-9 on, whereas McCain is 5-1.

[Updates: Eli notes that Nature is endorsing Obama. C provides us with a wider choice of odds, and InTrade has him as a near-cert. But can you trust it?]

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/84678

Comments

1

Tom Adams wrote

"Mccain has consistently traded higher at Intrade than in other futures markets, due to the activities of a single "institutional" trader, a trader who is obviously not seeking out the cheapest trades by using all available markets:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/20/business/20predict.html?ref=business
"

I can confirm there was a 10% difference between betfair and intrade, I grabbed some (though a shame I had put too much in before the gap grew to 10%). The gap did briefly disappear but now when writing the difference is 11.1% to 11.6% on betfair compared to 16.6% to 16.9% on Intrade.

Posted by: crandles | October 31, 2008 12:37 PM

2

http://www.oddschecker.com/specials/politics-and-election/us-presidential-election/to-be-elected-president

It does seem as if it is intrade that is out of line. You can get better odds than at paddypower.

Posted by: crandles | October 31, 2008 12:53 PM

3

Anyone who wants to publish in Nature has to back Obama

Posted by: Eli Rabett | October 31, 2008 3:50 PM

4

>"InTrade has him as a near-cert".

Is this a spot the deliberate error thing? Intrade has Obama at 84.7% while betfair has close to 89%. I find it surprising that the difference is so persistant rather than arbitrage eliminating the difference.

Posted by: crandles | October 31, 2008 7:04 PM

5

I don't know about the odds but the polls suggest a landslide.

Obama 353, McCain 185.

Posted by: TrueSceptic | November 3, 2008 7:42 AM

6

I see that my link disappeared. Again, http://www.electoral-vote.com/

Posted by: TrueSceptic | November 3, 2008 7:46 AM

7

Well done USA (we hope)!

Posted by: P. Lewis | November 5, 2008 10:33 AM

8

Yes we can! ;)

Posted by: Magnus Westerstrand | November 5, 2008 4:45 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Enter to win

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM