Stoat
Taking science by the throat...
Profile
My family and me.
More...
Make sure you're familiar with the Comment Policy
Search
Recent Posts
- Yet more snarking
- First Look at Carbon Capture and Storage in a West Virginia Coal-Fired Power Plant?
- Wadhams on sea ice
- Fireworks
- Tiljander, again
- Corbyn again
- Oh no! More snarking
- The seminal Myles Allen
- Ash-man and Teslathon
- Tiljander
Recent Comments
- Hank Roberts on Yet more snarking
- carrot eater on Yet more snarking
- Boris on Yet more snarking
- Deep Climate on Yet more snarking
- Nathan on Wildfires and global warming
- Ted Nordhaus on Yet more snarking
- carrot eater on Yet more snarking
- Brian Schmidt on Oh no! More snarking
- Hank Roberts on Tiljander, again
- Hank Roberts on Oh no! More snarking
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
Blogroll
- Back Seat Driving
- Bryan's Blog
- CIP
- Climate Feedback (Nature)
- QS/DA
- Deltoid
- Eli t Rabett
- FPA: climate change
- Framing Science
- Jeb
- John Fleck
- Only In It For The Gold
- Reality Check
- Real Climate
- RP Sr
- RP Jr
- Sagredo
- Some are Boojums
Other Information
| Co-moderator of globalchange mailing list | Subscribe to globalchange |
| Browse at groups.google.com | |
« Adrakhonic Theorem | Main | A certain loss »
Kerching!
Category: climate economics
Posted on: December 9, 2008 7:57 AM, by William M. Connolley
Find more posts in: 
Environment
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/87503
Comments
But is this just a recycled story from four years ago?
Myles Allen & Richard Lord, The Blame Game - who will pay for the damaging consequences of climate change?, Nature, 432, pp.551-552, December 2004.
http://www.climateprediction.net/science/pubs/Allen&Lord.pdf
[Sounds very much like a retread, though there are breathless hints of some new publication -W]
Posted by: crandles | December 9, 2008 12:45 PM
Or something totally new in that you are plugging climateprediction.net and the seasonal attribution project part of it? ;)
Posted by: crandles | December 9, 2008 1:06 PM
A couple of links in case anyone wants to know more or look for some more breathless hints like 'very dependent on the type of sea surface temperature (SST) patterns that we input into our model'.
http://attribution.cpdn.org/about.php
http://attribution.cpdn.org/extension.php
Posted by: crandles | December 9, 2008 2:55 PM
Scientists giving advise on legal issues?
Lawyers get criticized for their treatment of science all the time, so now its time for lawyers to strike back. Maybe a lawsuit... ;)
Posted by: Joseph O'Sullivan | December 9, 2008 4:26 PM
I say bring it on.
These dishonest, mediocre alarmist "scientists" would be crucified. under cross-examination.
Exhibit 1, Your Honour: the hockeystick.
Posted by: mugwump | December 10, 2008 7:43 AM
Oh dear, Mugwump...
Posted by: outeast | December 10, 2008 9:45 AM
Another idea: if power companies can be sued for their fictitious contribution to global warming, it should be possible to sue Al Gore, the IPCC, Stern, et al, to recover any additional taxation or other costs incurred as a result of their disinformation campaigns.
Welcome to the 21st century's Spanish Inquisition.
Posted by: mugwump | December 10, 2008 11:33 AM
I've tried a number of posts on climate liability issues here in the States. My guess for the best shots at finding liability is in any damage related to sea level rise, and in any increase in the need or expense of preparing for conditions made worse by AGW (e.g. a larger evacuation area, higher hurricane liability insurance). In both cases, the causation hurdle is already overcome (pretty much). Last speculation on it here:
http://backseatdriving.blogspot.com/2008/04/tort-liability-of-climate-polluters-for.html
Posted by: Brian Schmidt | December 10, 2008 2:08 PM
mugwump doth complain too much, methinks.
Posted by: bi -- IJI | December 11, 2008 1:15 PM
No complants from me. In fact, I believe I said "bring it on".
Absent brainwashed juries - and another couple of years of declining temps will fix that - the case for catastrophic human-induced global warming would be crucified in any decent courtroom.
Posted by: mugwump | December 12, 2008 8:02 AM