Now on ScienceBlogs: Zihlman's 'pygmy chimpanzee hypothesis'

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Stoat

Taking science by the throat...

Profile

Me My family and me. More...

Make sure you're familiar with the Comment Policy

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

Co-moderator of globalchange mailing list Subscribe to globalchange
Email:
Browse at groups.google.com
I've been using Google Reader recently, following the lamented death of Planet Fleck, and I suppose I have to admit its better. Here are some "shared items" if, for some reason, you want to read what I read.

« Mays | Main | Sea ice: how to describe the possibility of a record? »

I feel better for that

Category: climate communicationrowingsea ice
Posted on: June 15, 2009 5:08 PM, by William M. Connolley

Catz women catching FaT (I think) on saturday. Which was all jolly good fun but meant that I didn't get to row myself all week after monday. And over the weekend I felt somewhat ill. Coupled with pouring rain at 4 this afternoon I was not at all looking forward to being 6 in our "M1" crew for the X-press head today. However, despite light rain as we were boating, we managed to row really quite well given the scratch nature of our crew (well done Phil, especially; and James's first serious race as stroke) and rowing in a stiff boat was a delight, as was the raw arrogance of James T's coxing. We don't have a time yet but given that we overtook (an admittedly rather slow) Radegund crew, and comfortably held off a 9's crew that we had expected to stuff us, I have some hopes of a decent result.

But this isn't a blog purely about my tedious rowing. So I'll briefly mention sea ice. some people have noticed that this years NH sea ice is looking to push 2007's record, based on curve-crossing (mt's pic isn't a snapshot, so it looks rather less impressive now than when he put it up). As I said over there, I prefer http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/en/home/seaice_extent.htm, and not just because it makes my money look safer. No, because it gives a more accurate idea of what is going on. As you can see form that last link, 2007 wasn't consistently low - it was easily beaten by 2006 at this time of the season. mt's pic is really a perfect example of how to mislead with graphics (note: I'm certain that mt had not the slightest intent to mislead anyone). They need to replace the 1979-2000 average with the 1979-2006 range to produce something meaningful.

[Update: Eli is in on this too, but he doesn't know what is going on either :-) -W]

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/112484

Comments

1

The IJIS map is stuck at 11th June. I wonder if James Annan could shake them up a bit?

Cheers, Alastair.

Posted by: Alastair McDonald | June 15, 2009 6:00 PM

3

Another entry in the form book.

Posted by: Gareth | June 16, 2009 6:36 AM

4

Looks promising for the NE passage. A friend-of-a-friend is apparently seeking permission from the Russians after sailing the NW passage last summer.

Posted by: Andrew T | June 16, 2009 9:37 PM

5

It does and it doesn't. This year the strongest melt is occurring between Greenland and Norway. Right now it almost looks like there is broken ice at the pole. The Siberian Alaskan side is in better shape than in 2007, but it is not solid ice. The pattern is interesting. (BTW, posed the series a few days ago.)

Posted by: Eli Rabett | June 17, 2009 12:53 AM

6

FWIW I think what is happening at the moment is that the melt ponds are draining. The loss of water from over the ice means that the satellites think the ice is growing.

The clues which back that idea are the message on the IJIS web site:


The current version of data processing produces an erroneous blip of sea-ice extent on June 1 and October 15, which is seen in the graph of sea-ice extent as a small peak on these dates. The apparent blip arises due to switching of some parameters in the processing on those dates. The parameter switching is needed because the surface of the Arctic sea ice becomes wet in summer due to the melting of ice, drastically changing the satellite-observed signatures of sea ice. We will soon improve the processing to make the graph much smoother.
http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/en/home/seaice_extent.htm


and the 'hiccup' in the ice record for 2007 here:
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png

Cheers, Alastair.

Posted by: Alastair McDonald | June 17, 2009 3:44 PM

7

I'm watching MODIS, and the Canadian Met Office charts, daily. Recommended. Aside from that, I'm going to keep my own counsel at least for a month or two.

[You won't get any points for making predictions of the max in 2 months time :-) -W]

Posted by: Nick Barnes | June 17, 2009 6:02 PM

8

I'm not after points. For what it's worth, I think I'm going to win 50 euros again this year.

[Who did you get 50 euros from last year? -W]

But what I'm getting from MODIS and the weather charts is interesting to me, and seems somewhat unusual. Nares Strait is never empty like that, certainly not in May and June. There's also a lot of clear water around Bathurst Island, and the weather station in the north of Ellesmere Island has been above 5 degrees for weeks. But there's been no appreciable melt of the NW passage for a while. Over the other side, there's a lot of broken ice far north-east of Svalbard, up to 85+ degrees.

It's clear we're going to get low ice, but maybe low like 2005 rather than low like 2007. At the end of the day, breaking records is always down to the weather. There's a persistent high pressure area over the northern Beaufort Sea which could be decisive.

Posted by: Nick Barnes | June 18, 2009 4:49 AM

9

I'm not after points. For what it's worth, I think I'm going to win 50 euros again this year.

But what I'm getting from MODIS and the weather charts is interesting to me, and seems somewhat unusual. Nares Strait is never empty like that, certainly not in May and June. There's also a lot of clear water around Bathurst Island, and the weather station in the north of Ellesmere Island has been above 5 degrees for weeks. But there's been no appreciable melt of the NW passage for a while. Over the other side, there's a lot of broken ice far north-east of Svalbard, up to 85+ degrees.

It's clear we're going to get low ice, but maybe low like 2005 rather than low like 2007. At the end of the day, breaking records is always down to the weather. There's a persistent high pressure area over the northern Beaufort Sea which could be decisive.

Posted by: Nick Barnes | June 18, 2009 5:12 AM

10

Last year's 50 Euros was from Joe Hunkins, aka Joeduck, who wanted another bite this year:
http://rankexploits.com/musings/2008/nothern-hemisphere-sea-ice-hows-it-going/

Posted by: Nick Barnes | June 18, 2009 5:15 AM

11

Has a pool started yet? I'm offering a dubious prize here:
http://lablemminglounge.blogspot.com/2009/06/minimum-arctic-sea-ice-extent-betting.html

No bets until solstice, though.

Posted by: Lab Lemming | June 18, 2009 9:09 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM