Now on ScienceBlogs: Technology Review Magazine Poised to Return as Festival Sponsor!

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Stoat

Taking science by the throat... climate, rowing, and misc.

Profile

Me My family and me. More...

Make sure you're familiar with the Comment Policy

Confused by my constant use of abbreviations? Then you need the Glossary

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

Co-moderator of globalchange mailing list Subscribe to globalchange
Email:
Browse at groups.google.com
I've been using Google Reader recently, following the lamented death of Planet Fleck, and I suppose I have to admit its better. Here are some "shared items" if, for some reason, you want to read what I read.

« Not a good try and definitely no cigar | Main | Zorita scents gravy »

Letter from Holland

Category: climate communication
Posted on: February 12, 2010 5:10 AM, by William M. Connolley

There is a good letter from some Dutch scientists at Open brief Nederlandse klimaatonderzoekers over IPCC en over fouten in Klimaatrapport 2007 (don't worry, its in English too). I think it does a good job of setting the recent "IPCC is utterly corrupt / mistaken / broken / infiltrated by space aliens / needs to be disbanded" thing in perspective.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Environment

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/131642

Comments

1

Sadly, we see the same kind of overselling of the letter as the rightful criticism of the OISM petitions. There are many researchers who signed the letter who are involved in climate science. But there are also some that are not.

Posted by: Marco | February 12, 2010 5:43 AM

2

OK, which one of you is the space alien?

Posted by: carrot eater | February 12, 2010 6:54 AM

3

From the letter:
Given the fact that the climate system exhibits tipping
points, this may lead to partly unpredictable and possibly far reaching and irreversible impacts on society and nature.

It certainly is news that tipping points are a given. It is an assertion without any even semi conclusive research behind it.

The letter is a weak apologia, arguing that the IPCC has proper quality control because its by-laws say that it does.

Posted by: Paul Kelly | February 12, 2010 3:44 PM

4

It's now possible to support this open letter by co-signing it (PhD's only). Go to http://www.sense.nl/openletter/

Posted by: Bart Verheggen | February 16, 2010 1:59 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.