I seem to have commenters who think I should read more CA, or Watty, or RP Sr, or misc other exciting stuff (I’m sure RP Sr loves being lumped in with that lot). Anyway, my response is, why? None of them, that I can see, have anything half as interesting as this or this or this. And Jules’ pix are good, too.
So in future, if you want to tell me that I really really ought to read such and such a blog: please tell me why. And please include a link to one of their posts that is at least somewhere in the running to being as interesting as one of the above.
Ah, I can’t just leave you with that. Take this cartoon too:
courtesy of Bart. Who takes a dig at the “skeptics” (yes I know: I’m just winding you up. Don’t bother respond).
[Update: James reprimands me for not plugging Jules's pix. Its a fair cop guv, wo here is one:
I like that one, though on further reflection the asymmetrical clipping of the bowl is irritating. Anyway, over you go; there are mountains and Japan and stuff -W]