Last week was the first real week of teaching in that it was the first week when we had content-driven classes. So Tuesday saw me walking into class for a three-hour seminar on Galileo (to be repeated again on Thursday). The reading was relatively easy - Drake's translations of Starry Messenger (1610), Letters on Sunspots (1613) and the Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina (1615) - so I expected no major problems with that. One of the most difficult things, in my mind at least, is trying to convince students about how novel Galileo's finisings were. They know about the moons of Jupiter, they know about heliocentrism (unlike the approximately 25% of Americans who apparently don't), they have perhaps used better telescopes than Galileo, and they see Hubble Space Telescope pictures on a regular basis. We ended up spending the first two hours examining Galileo's evidence and how it proved difficult to explain using the Ptolemaic model, with brief pauses on Copernicus, Kepler, and Brahe. I ended by tying it all in with Descartes (who we are reading this week) and Newton (next week).
The last hour we spent on the Letter, more as a teaser to the issues about science and religion that we will encounter when we discuss Kant, Paley, Hume, and, of course, Darwin. All in all, it was a relatively successful class, though there was probably a little too much talking from me (perhaps justifiable in that there was a lot of grounding material to be covered for the next few weeks).
Wednesday's class it totally different - a three hour lecture (mostly) course on Origins, Evolution and Creation. This week I was supposed to cover (albeit briefly) the nature of science & religion and to introduce the students to the Documentary Hypothesis and Genesis (this in preparation for the few weeks we will be spending on young-earth creationism). Sadly, for me at least, I never got round to the latter portion of the class and now have to figure out where to put the material in this week's lecture on pre-Darwinian thought. The good news, though, was that the class of 45 talked, asked questions, and generally interacted with me ... always good especially in a lecture course for (mostly) non-majors.
Stranger Fruit
thoughts on science, history, and teaching
Who am I?

John M. Lynch is an Honors Faculty Fellow at Barrett the Honors College at Arizona State University. He's also affiliated with ASU's Center for Biology & Society. When he's not an historian of anti-evolutionism, he's an evolutionary morphologist. Much to his surprise, in 2007 he was named the Arizona Professor of the Year. No doubt his students were surprised as well.
Search
Social Networking
Currently Reading
Always Reading
Recent Posts
- The time has come ...
- Some bad news before I go ...
- Good news before I go ...
- Things to do, places to see ...
- Simplify
- 2000th Post
- Francis Beckwith, Creationism and ID
- On flying elephants
- Teaching Evolution One Icon At A Time
- Friday Felid #19
Recent Comments
- Monado on Friday Felid #19
- jpj on Good news before I go ...
- Thony C. on Good news before I go ...
- Glenn Branch on Good news before I go ...
- anand on The Value of History of Science to Science Education
- Soma on Monday Mustelid #34
- CHRISS BISHARD on Monday Mammal
- Dan! on Simplify
- jim on Casey Luskin is a WHAT?
- MartinC on Teaching Evolution One Icon At A Time
Categories
- Anti-evolution
- Biology
- Bits and Pieces
- Books
- Earth and Planetary Sciences
- History and Philosophy (often of Science)
- Humor
- Math and Physics
- Politics
- Pseudoscience
- Science Education
- Technology
- The Life Academic
- The Panda's Thumb (cross posts)
Archives
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
Non-Sbs I have met
- hpb etc. Rob Skipper
- The Intersection Chris Mooney
- Lippardblog Jim Lippard
- Ragesoss Sage Ross
- Systematics & Biogeography Malte Ebach & David Williams
- Time to Eat the Dogs Michael Robinson
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable Brent Rasmussen
- Warning! PhD in Progress Jessica Joganic
Fighting the Good Fight
- Panda's Thumb The source for information on evolutionary biology and anti-evolutionism.
- Sunbeams from Cucumbers Steve Reuland.
- De Rerum Natura Reed Cartwright.
- Austringer Wes Elsberry.
- Astroblog Ian Musgrave.
- Thoughts in a Haystack John Pieret edits the Talk Origins Quote Mine project.
- Playing Chess with Pigeons Troy Britain is a talk.origins regular.
Other Stuff
« Yet another poll | Main | The Flew Maneuver »
First real week of teaching
Category: The Life Academic
Posted on: January 29, 2006 3:43 PM, by John Lynch
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/622









Comments
Can you expand a little on the course - is it Philosophy of Science, or History of Science? Is it team-taught? Why three hours once a week? That's a killer! Is there a syllabus online?
Posted by: coturnix
| January 29, 2006 3:55 PM
Glad you asked :)
The Tuesday class (also offered on Thursday) is the second half of the "Great Books" seminar that is mandatory for honors students here at ASU. It is a Socratic seminar with 19 students and one professor (I am one of twelve that teach between two and four sections a semester). It is writing intensive and aims to allow the students engage with primary materials. In the past, it has largely concentrated on non-scientific texts, but recently some of us have developed more "science intensive" sections - the goal being for students (often science or engineering majors) to get exposted to primary texts within the sciences while also exposing them to the historical, cultural, and philsophical background. So, in short, it is science, history of science, and philosophy of science, all rolled up into one!
Three hours ... traditionally the course meets twice or three times a week. I decided to try once a week to see what happens. I may yet regret it :)
Syllabus online ... not at the moment. It would probably be easier for me to post what the coming weeks hold:
I'll be posting about the course on and off over the semester.
Posted by: John Lynch
| January 29, 2006 4:09 PM
Great! Thank you.
I wish I had a class like this when I was young... The closest I got was a graduate seminar in which we read a lot of Darwin (and not about Darwin by others - that was a separate course) a course co-taught by a historian of science (a "Darwin scholar") and an evolutionary biologist.
Looking forward to your blogging the class through the semester!
Posted by: coturnix
| January 29, 2006 4:34 PM
The course sounds great -- found this blog while searching for "heliocentrism" lesson plans for public school kids. If you have some time to waste, I'd be grateful for any comments on my "Heliocentrism Day" project: http://www.swarthmore.edu/NatSci/cpurrin1/evolk12/slm/heliocentrismday.htm.
Cheers,
Colin
Posted by: cpurrin1
| February 6, 2006 12:13 PM