Now on ScienceBlogs: "Investigative science journalism" and books I like to read [All of My Faults Are Stress Related]

Seed Media Group

The Week In ScienceBlogs: Sign up for our newsletter.

Stranger Fruit

thoughts on science, history, and teaching

Who am I?

jml07.jpg

John M. Lynch is an Honors Faculty Fellow at Barrett the Honors College at Arizona State University. He's also affiliated with ASU's Center for Biology & Society. When he's not an historian of anti-evolutionism, he's an evolutionary morphologist. Much to his surprise, in 2007 he was named the Arizona Professor of the Year. No doubt his students were surprised as well.

Search

Social Networking

Currently Reading


cover

cover

cover

cover

Always Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Non-Sbs I have met

Fighting the Good Fight

Other Stuff

« Friday Poem | Main | I apologize »

Strange though it may seem ...

Category: In Their Own WordsIntelligent DesignPseudoscienceWeirdness
Posted on: September 15, 2006 9:14 PM, by John Lynch

Over at the Panda's Thumb, Nick highlights the following quote from Wiker and Witt's, A Meaningful World: How the Arts and Sciences Reveal the Genius of Nature:

Strange though it may seem to neo-Darwinists, Darwin's assumption that the terms species and variety are merely given for convenience's sake is part of a larger materialist and reductionist program that undercuts the natural foundation of counting and distorts the natural origin of mathematics. To put it more bluntly, in assuming that "species" are not real, Darwinism and the larger reductionist program burn away the original ties that bound the meaning of mathematics to the world and instead leave it stranded on a solipsistic island of the human imagination.

Damn straight, it's strange. It's beyond strange. It's frankly dumb, dumb, dumb. 

So bent are these two Fellows of the Discovery Institute on pinning everything on evil Darwinian naturalism, that they see Darwinism as part of a plot to strip meaning from mathematics. As for "Darwin's assumption," I suggest that Wiker (a philosopher) and Witt (an English Lit PhD, for jeez sake) actually get out and study some species and varieties, before they blather on about what Darwin had to say about them.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/21372

Comments

1

Certainly seems ridiculous to me.

Posted by: Michael | September 15, 2006 9:39 PM

2

Just because I can - let it be noted that Darwin did *not* say that species were not real. Agassiz tried that one on him, and Darwin responded to Gray "I am surprised that Agassiz did not succeed in writing something better. How absurd that logical quibble "if species do not exist how can they vary"? As if anyone doubted their temporary existence?"

What Darwin did deny as real, and what he attached the convenience tag to, was the *rank* of species. The difference between variety and species was arbitrary. But the things themselves, the taxa, were real enough, albeit temporary.

Posted by: John Wilkins | September 15, 2006 10:14 PM

3

More evidence that the job market for ELit PhDs is atrocious. It's a damn shame, though, this nutbar got a job at all.

Posted by: ChrisTheRed | September 16, 2006 5:53 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM