Stranger Fruit

Mr Pot, meet Mr Kettle

Professor Emeritus Peter Irons (Political Science, UC San Diego):

“It seems to me the height of hypocrisy for the Discovery Institute to accuse Judge Jones of copying 90 percent of one section of his opinion (just 16 percent of its total length) from the proposed findings of fact by the plaintiff’s lawyers, when the DI itself tried to palm off as ‘original’ work a law review article [submitted to Montana Law Review] that was copied 95 percent from the authors’ own book {Traipsing Into Evolution]. Concealing this fact from the law review editors, until
I discovered and documented this effort, seriously undercuts the credibility of the DI on this or any other issue.”

Ed has more.

(Update 12/19)