Dembski himself once defined intelligence as "the power and facility to choose between options - this coincides with the Latin etymology of 'intelligence,' namely, 'to choose between'". What happens if you use this definition to argue, on Dembski's own blog, that the theory of evolution "postulates as the agent of evolutionary change - a process of_selection_ (aka 'choice') between options" - that is, given Dembski's own definition of intelligence, natural selection is an intelligent process. Predictably, you get banned. Richard Hoppe has more.
Stranger Fruit
thoughts on science, history, and teaching
Who am I?
John M. Lynch is an Honors Faculty Fellow at Barrett the Honors College at Arizona State University. He's also affiliated with ASU's Center for Biology & Society. When he's not an historian of anti-evolutionism, he's an evolutionary morphologist. Much to his surprise, in 2007 he was named the Arizona Professor of the Year. No doubt his students were surprised as well.
Search
Social Networking
Currently Reading
Always Reading
Recent Posts
- The time has come ...
- Some bad news before I go ...
- Good news before I go ...
- Things to do, places to see ...
- Simplify
- 2000th Post
- Francis Beckwith, Creationism and ID
- On flying elephants
- Teaching Evolution One Icon At A Time
- Friday Felid #19
Recent Comments
- Monado on Friday Felid #19
- jpj on Good news before I go ...
- Thony C. on Good news before I go ...
- Glenn Branch on Good news before I go ...
- anand on The Value of History of Science to Science Education
- Soma on Monday Mustelid #34
- CHRISS BISHARD on Monday Mammal
- Dan! on Simplify
- jim on Casey Luskin is a WHAT?
- MartinC on Teaching Evolution One Icon At A Time
Categories
- Anti-evolution
- Biology
- Bits and Pieces
- Books
- Earth and Planetary Sciences
- History and Philosophy (often of Science)
- Humor
- Math and Physics
- Politics
- Pseudoscience
- Science Education
- Technology
- The Life Academic
- The Panda's Thumb (cross posts)
Archives
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
Non-Sbs I have met
- hpb etc. Rob Skipper
- The Intersection Chris Mooney
- Lippardblog Jim Lippard
- Ragesoss Sage Ross
- Systematics & Biogeography Malte Ebach & David Williams
- Time to Eat the Dogs Michael Robinson
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable Brent Rasmussen
- Warning! PhD in Progress Jessica Joganic
Fighting the Good Fight
- Panda's Thumb The source for information on evolutionary biology and anti-evolutionism.
- Sunbeams from Cucumbers Steve Reuland.
- De Rerum Natura Reed Cartwright.
- Austringer Wes Elsberry.
- Astroblog Ian Musgrave.
- Thoughts in a Haystack John Pieret edits the Talk Origins Quote Mine project.
- Playing Chess with Pigeons Troy Britain is a talk.origins regular.
Other Stuff
« Catwoman would be *so* jealous | Main | Everyone else is doing it, so why cant we? »
Using the master's tools against him
Category: In Their Own Words • Intelligent Design
Posted on: January 10, 2007 2:08 AM, by John Lynch
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/30124
Comments
So evolutionary design = intelligent design. Scary stuff.
Posted by: romunov | January 11, 2007 2:38 AM