Who am I?

John M. Lynch is an Honors Faculty Fellow at Barrett the Honors College at Arizona State University. He's also affiliated with ASU's Center for Biology & Society. When he's not an historian of anti-evolutionism, he's an evolutionary morphologist. Much to his surprise, in 2007 he was named the Arizona Professor of the Year. No doubt his students were surprised as well.
Search this blog
Social Networking
Currently Reading
Always Reading
Recent Posts
- Liberty and Science
- Monday Mustelid #32
- Break
- ID and Global Warming – No contest
- Monday Mustelid #31
- Ironic Statement of the Month
- Vatican Event to Exclude Intelligent Design
- Monday Mustelid #30
- Okapi photographed in the wild for the first time
- Lipstick on a pig
Recent Comments
- John S. Wilkins on Liberty and Science
- littlejohn on Conservapedia evolves
- Rich Zimmerman on Monday Mustelid #32
- Dave S. on ID and Global Warming – No contest
- Michael on ID and Global Warming – No contest
- amy on Polar bears are threatened
- Jeremy Burman on The big list of history of science blogs
- steve s on ID and Global Warming – No contest
- sparc on Break
- Modusoperandi on Break
Categories
- Anti-evolution
- Biology
- Bits and Pieces
- Books
- Earth and Planetary Sciences
- History and Philosophy (often of Science)
- Humor
- Math and Physics
- Politics
- Pseudoscience
- Science Education
- Technology
- The Life Academic
- The Panda's Thumb (cross posts)
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
Bloggers I have met
- Adventures in Ethics and Science Janet Stemwedel
- Aetiology Tara Smith
- evolgen RPM
- Evolving Thoughts John Wilkins
- hpb etc. Rob Skipper
- The Intersection Chris Mooney
- Lippardblog Jim Lippard
- Living the Scientific Life GrrlScientist
- Neurotopia Evil Monkey
- Pharyngula PZ Myers
- Ragesoss Sage Ross
- Systematics & Biogeography Malte Ebach & David Williams
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable Brent Rasmussen
- The Voltage Gate Jeremy Bruno
- The World's Fair David Ng and Ben Cohen
- Warning! PhD in Progress Jessica Joganic (Jes is an ex-student of mine beginning her new life as a grad student in physical anthropology).
Fighting the Good Fight
- Panda's Thumb The source for information on evolutionary biology and anti-evolutionism.
- Sunbeams from Cucumbers Steve Reuland, a fellow PTer.
- De Rerum Natura Reed Cartwright, another PTer.
- Austringer Wes Elsberry, yet another PTer.
- Astroblog Ian Musgrave is also a PTer.
- Thoughts in a Haystack John Pieret edits the Talk Origins Quote Mine project.
- Playing Chess with Pigeons Troy Britain is a talk.origins regular.
Other Stuff
Subscribe via Email
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« Today in Science | Main | Today in Science »
Modern Republican intellectuals
Category: Anti-evolution
Posted on: May 6, 2007 3:56 PM, by John Lynch




Comments
That's insulting to monkeys.
But thanks for their names.
Posted by: Roy | May 6, 2007 4:40 PM
I'm with Roy.
Posted by: ckennedy | May 7, 2007 2:43 PM
Very funny, but I'm with David Stove, author of Darwinian Fairytales." If you are so sure of Darwinian thought to explain human activity, please explain if any of you have bred to the fullest capacity possible, and are doing so because you fear starvation through Malthusian mechanisms if you don't. Any of you really feel your activity is best explained by your genes ordering you around as Mr Dawkins thinks?
Posted by: mark leo | May 7, 2007 7:26 PM
mark leo, in order to replicate, our genes have made sex enjoyable, so that even if we didn't want to have children we would have them anyway as a result of enjoying sex so much. However we don't "breed to the fullest" because we can now enjoy sex, and thanks to birth control we don't have to have children, unless we want to.
Dawkins is not a simplistic determinist.
Posted by: dareano | May 7, 2007 8:14 PM
As proprietor of 'Scientific Republican' ,I must protest this
vile canard-- our bumper sticker, copyright to be registered , reads: "Raise your tail if you don't believe in evolution"
Available soon at better rum shops ,marine sanctuaries,and bicycle rental establishments in Nantucket,Newport, Bermuda and the Grenadines.
Posted by: Russell | May 7, 2007 11:30 PM
This clip might be old news, but it's oddly appropriate and completely bananas, literally.
Posted by: Sean | May 8, 2007 1:39 AM