Now on ScienceBlogs: The Laboratory at Harvard

Seed Media Group

Stranger Fruit

thoughts on science, history, and teaching

Who am I?

jml07.jpg

John M. Lynch is an Honors Faculty Fellow at Barrett the Honors College at Arizona State University. He's also affiliated with ASU's Center for Biology & Society. When he's not an historian of anti-evolutionism, he's an evolutionary morphologist. Much to his surprise, in 2007 he was named the Arizona Professor of the Year. No doubt his students were surprised as well.

Search

Social Networking

Currently Reading


cover

cover

cover

cover

Always Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Non-Sbs I have met

Fighting the Good Fight

Other Stuff

« O Solo Mio | Main | Today in Science »

Cockburn on Climate Change (again)

Posted on: June 11, 2007 7:52 PM, by John Lynch

Awhile back, Mark Hoofnagle took on what he termed "the lunatic ravings" of Alexander Cockburn in The Nation. In his piece, Mark noted that Cockburn wrote:

Not so long ago, [Martin] Hertzberg sent me some of his recent papers on the global warming hypothesis, a construct now accepted by many progressives as infallible as Papal dogma on matters of faith or doctrine. Among them was the graph described above so devastating to the hypothesis.

To which Mark replied:

Ah, papers! But wait. Where are these papers published? Where are the citations? Where is the peer review? How can we possibly analyze this ingenious disproof of the entirety of climate science without a citation?

Well. Now we know. In this Counterpunch.org article Cockburn spills the beans:

  • M. Hertzberg and J. B. Stott, "Greenhouse Warming of the Atmosphere", 25th International Symposium on Combustion, Irvine, CA (1994), Poster Session No. 5, Paper # 73, p459
  • M. Hertzberg, "The Facts and Fictions of Global Warming", talk presented at the ’Cafe Scientifique at the Summit’, Frisco, CO, Oct. 3, 2006

That’s it folks. A poster abstract and a popular talk given at a Cafe Scientifique. This is up there with the ID literature, so I’m guessing Cockburn will write a few columns on radical "dissidents against dogma" like Dembski, Wells & Nelson are being oppressed.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/42827

Comments

1

That is so unfair. Cockburn also cites Lyndon Larouche's 21st Century Science and Technology...

Posted by: Tim Lambert | June 11, 2007 10:02 PM

2
21st Century Science & Technology magazine challenges the assumptions of modern scientific dogma, including quantum mechanics, relativity theory, biological reductionism, and the formalization and separation of mathematics from physics.

Wow.

Posted by: John Lynch | June 11, 2007 10:12 PM

3

Not only just a poster presentation, a 13 year old poster presentation...one would expect an actual paper between then and now if the presentation held up...

Posted by: BruceJ | June 12, 2007 2:21 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Enter to win

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM