Now on ScienceBlogs: NIH ARRA / supplement success story [DrugMonkey]

Seed Media Group

More ScienceBlogs: Last 24 HoursLife SciencePhysical ScienceEnvironmentHumanitiesEducationPoliticsMedicineBrain & BehaviorTechnologyInformation ScienceJobs

The Week In ScienceBlogs: Sign up for our newsletter.

Stranger Fruit

thoughts on science, history, and teaching

Who am I?

jml07.jpg

John M. Lynch is an Honors Faculty Fellow at Barrett the Honors College at Arizona State University. He's also affiliated with ASU's Center for Biology & Society. When he's not an historian of anti-evolutionism, he's an evolutionary morphologist. Much to his surprise, in 2007 he was named the Arizona Professor of the Year. No doubt his students were surprised as well.

Search

Social Networking

Currently Reading


cover

cover

cover

cover

Always Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Non-Sbs I have met

Fighting the Good Fight

Other Stuff

« A mild rant for the evening | Main | Today in Science (0822) »

If you're going to read one book this year ...

Posted on: August 21, 2007 9:10 PM, by John Lynch

... you are doing better that 25% of the American public.

One in four adults read no books at all in the past year, according to an Associated Press-Ipsos poll released today.

The Bible and religious works were read by two-thirds in the survey [who read any book], more than all other categories. ... Those likeliest to read religious books included older and married women, lower earners, minorities, lesser educated people, Southerners,
rural residents, Republicans and Conservatives. (source)

Interestingly, "those who said they never attend religious services read nearly twice as many [books] as those who attend frequently."

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/48628

Comments

1

Actually, probably better than 50% of the American public. The new AP poll is at odds with some much larger and more rigorous datasets--here's my discussion of where the AP poll conflicts with the others. I've recently been looking at the older surveys in posts on "How much do we read?" and "Who reads genre fiction?"

Posted by: RfP | August 22, 2007 2:50 AM

2

I had once heard - and I'm bringing this up because I'd like to be corrected if I'm wrong - that many people consider reading a magazine to be reading a book.

Posted by: TomS | August 22, 2007 7:11 AM

3

Hum, amazingly poor statistics. This is one of the damn shocking things with this society, the way books are treated.

I was asked last week, while I was organizing my moving sale, if I was teaching litterature, for the books I was selling were from classic authors...

Posted by: Laurent | August 23, 2007 10:51 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM