Not looking good for the cdesign proponentsists and their attempts to weaken science education by proposing "academic freedom" bills. First Florida. Now Alabama.
Who am I?
John M. Lynch is an Honors Faculty Fellow at Barrett the Honors College at Arizona State University. He's also affiliated with ASU's Center for Biology & Society. When he's not an historian of anti-evolutionism, he's an evolutionary morphologist. Much to his surprise, in 2007 he was named the Arizona Professor of the Year. No doubt his students were surprised as well.
Search this blog
Social Networking
Currently Reading
Always Reading
Recent Posts
- Racist idiots in Marietta, Georgia
- Einstein's God
- Stuart Kauffman reinvents God
- The funniest thing about intelligent design
- Monday Mustelid #17
- Myrmekiaphila neilyoungi keeps on rocking in the free world
- May Der Zirkle be unbroken ...
- War Against Motherhood.
- Another "academic freedom" bill dies on the vine.
- Look at the evidence
Recent Comments
- Pete on Racist idiots in Marietta, Georgia
- Crudely Wrott on Stuart Kauffman reinvents God
- Jim Thomerson on Racist idiots in Marietta, Georgia
- Alex, FCD on Racist idiots in Marietta, Georgia
- Karen on Racist idiots in Marietta, Georgia
- deang on Racist idiots in Marietta, Georgia
- Friend Fruit on Stuart Kauffman reinvents God
- Friend Fruit on Stuart Kauffman reinvents God
- MarcC on Stuart Kauffman reinvents God
- Lenora on Monday Mustelid #15 (and #16!)
Categories
- Anti-evolution
- Biology
- Bits and Pieces
- Books
- Earth and Planetary Sciences
- History and Philosophy (often of Science)
- Humor
- Math and Physics
- Politics
- Pseudoscience
- Science Education
- Technology
- The Life Academic
- The Panda's Thumb (cross posts)
Archives
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
Bloggers I have met
- Adventures in Ethics and Science Janet Stemwedel
- Aetiology Tara Smith
- evolgen RPM
- Evolving Thoughts John Wilkins
- hpb etc. Rob Skipper
- The Intersection Chris Mooney
- Lippardblog Jim Lippard
- Living the Scientific Life GrrlScientist
- Neurotopia Evil Monkey
- Pharyngula PZ Myers
- Ragesoss Sage Ross
- Systematics & Biogeography Malte Ebach & David Williams
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable Brent Rasmussen
- The Voltage Gate Jeremy Bruno
- The World's Fair David Ng and Ben Cohen
Fighting the Good Fight
- Panda's Thumb The source for information on evolutionary biology and anti-evolutionism.
- Sunbeams from Cucumbers Steve Reuland, a fellow PTer.
- De Rerum Natura Reed Cartwright, another PTer.
- Austringer Wes Elsberry, yet another PTer.
- Astroblog Ian Musgrave is also a PTer.
- Thoughts in a Haystack John Pieret edits the Talk Origins Quote Mine project.
- Playing Chess with Pigeons Troy Britain is a talk.origins regular.
Other Stuff
Subscribe via Email
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« Look at the evidence | Main | War Against Motherhood. »
Another "academic freedom" bill dies on the vine.
Category: Anti-evolution • Intelligent Design • Politics • Science Education
Posted on: May 9, 2008 3:40 PM, by John Lynch
Comments
There's a typo in the title "feedom" should be "freedom".
Posted by: Joshua Zelinsky | May 9, 2008 7:07 PM
Thanks. Fixed.
Posted by: John Lynch | May 9, 2008 7:19 PM
Looks like the latest anti-evolution stratagem may turn out to be a complete dud, which would joy me to no end.
If that turns out to be the case, then it will solidify the emerging reality the DI and their groupies are basically irrelevant.
Posted by: Tyler DiPietro | May 9, 2008 9:27 PM
They are not 'basically irrelevant', Tyler, they are a dark, backward-oriented force, much like the cat'lick church, and the other powerful religious groups.
But I don't think rational arguments will be of much help to make them understand anything. They want dogma. Reality would scare the shit out of them, and there sure is a lot of shit in them to be scared out.
Posted by: shonny | May 10, 2008 12:01 AM
They want dogma
ID is secular as it only posts an "intelligent" agency, it does not make any claims to it being either natural or supernatural. Here is an example...
The Edge of Evolution (p. 237):
Malaria was intentionally designed. The molecular machinery with which the parasite invades red blood cells is an exquisitely purposeful arrangement of parts. C-Eve's children died in her arms partly because an intelligent agent deliberately made malaria, or at least something very similar to it.
This statement here produced by an ID proponent; Michael Bebe, would not be biblical. The Bible says, it was the "fall" which is not what Bebe concluded. And another thing, this conclusion of Bebe's wouldn't be acceptable for teaching in the public school. There is a difference about being critical when it comes to Evolution, such as showing it's weakness rather than teaching kids it's just plain fact whether or not we can explain certain aspects of the hypothesis.
While the ID Bills haven't done quite that well as of yet, I believe those proposing it, may not fully understand the need for details. They need to narrow down what they mean by being "critical" of evolution. ID is caught in the middle, creationists don't care for it's secularism much as it leads to unbiblical conclusions, and atheists don't care for the "intelligent" agency" concept because it violates their beliefs.
Posted by: Michael | May 10, 2008 6:13 AM
Academic freedom? Where was Norman Finkelstein's academic freedom when he was denied tenure for criticising Dershowitz?
The hypocrisy of the Right is astonishing.
Posted by: Onias | May 10, 2008 1:58 PM
"They are not 'basically irrelevant', Tyler, they are a dark, backward-oriented force, much like the cat'lick church, and the other powerful religious groups."
What I should say is "comparatively less relevant". I know there is always a danger of underestimating your enemies capabilities, but it's pretty clear to me that the DI has been effectively routed since the Dover. If this latest fiasco involving Expelled and "academic freedom" is to be taken as their comeback strategy, then they're in pretty bad shape IMO.
I have no doubt the broader anti-evolution movement can regroup, but it may be the case that the DI and the ID movement specifically has so thoroughly torpedoed its reputation that they're no longer a viable agent to carry out the agenda. The DI may be irrelevant much in the same way that the ICR and AiG are now pretty much irrelevant, they're no longer viable frontmen for the central effort of the anti-evolution movement, i.e., getting the crap into the schools.
Posted by: Tyler DiPietro | May 10, 2008 2:36 PM