Now on ScienceBlogs: Technology Review Magazine Poised to Return as Festival Sponsor!

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Stranger Fruit

thoughts on science, history, and teaching

Who am I?

jml07.jpg

John M. Lynch is an Honors Faculty Fellow at Barrett the Honors College at Arizona State University. He's also affiliated with ASU's Center for Biology & Society. When he's not an historian of anti-evolutionism, he's an evolutionary morphologist. Much to his surprise, in 2007 he was named the Arizona Professor of the Year. No doubt his students were surprised as well.

Search

Social Networking

Currently Reading


cover

cover

cover

cover

Always Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Non-Sbs I have met

Fighting the Good Fight

Other Stuff

« Ken Miller on clotting and Casey (Luskin, that is) | Main | A quote for a Sunday morning »

Nature’s “Evolution Gems”

Category: Evolution
Posted on: January 3, 2009 3:54 PM, by John Lynch

Some of you may already have seen this (for example, PZ has mentioned it), but Nature has put together a short PDF document that gives fifteen lines of "evidence for evolution by natural selection" [here]. Here's the list (stolen from PZ):

Take a look at the original document (and PZ's linked postings above). You can also actually download the original articles via the PDF.

I'd like to point out, however, that some of the "gems" don't actually provide much evidence for natural selection as a mechanism for evolution. They do instead offer strong evidence for the fact of evolution and the pathway through which organisms have traveled over time.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Life Science

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/89421

Comments

1

Fantastic! Remember I was asking you about an article just like this, not too long ago? Woo-hoo! I'm definitely going to use this in my classes.

Roberta

Posted by: Roberta Millstein | January 3, 2009 6:17 PM

2

I'd forgotten ...

Glad it works though.

Posted by: John Lynch | January 3, 2009 6:27 PM

3

Well, thanks for posting it. Glad to see you blogging again.

Posted by: Roberta Millstein | January 3, 2009 7:50 PM

4

Indohyus was not "an ancestor to whales" - for one thing it was roughly contemporary with archaeocetes such as Rodhocetus.

Posted by: Cameron | January 3, 2009 11:02 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.