Stranger Fruit


Apparently Alvin Plantinga and Daniel Dennett debated a week ago at a meeting of the Central Division of the American Philosophical Association. An anonymous individual live-blogged it somewhat hyperbolically  (?The tension between the titans fills the room?) but the account is worth a read, even if it is clear that the blogger is biased towards Plantinga. Apparently Plantinga attempted to defend Behe and Dennett slapped him around for that.

Short anonymous blogger: Dennett was snarky, nasty and didn?t take Plantinga seriously.

That?s the sort of thing that would get PZ?s blood boiling!

There – apparently – will be audio posted at some stage.


  1. #1 RBH
    February 28, 2009

    The audio is linked in a comment on that thread now. It’s an MP3 here.

  2. #2 DLC
    March 1, 2009

    I guess I don’t see the point in debating cdesign proponentsists creationists. It seems like a big waste of time.

  3. #3 Argon
    March 1, 2009

    Dennett is a ‘titan’ of philosophy? News to me.

  4. #4 Michael Fugate
    March 2, 2009

    Interesting conversation on the debate at blog.talkingphilosophy

  5. #5 rimpal
    March 6, 2009

    Plantinga is a “philosopher”? That’s news to me! Just another one of those “western philosophers” who have claimed ‘philosophy’ for theology.

  6. #6 John Lynch
    March 6, 2009

    @ Rimpal

    That’s a bit of a stupid comment. Plantinga – whether you agree with his religious beliefs or not – *is* a well respected philosopher. Your comment merely illustrates you know nothing about “western” philosophy (whatever you mean by that).

  7. #7 Wayne Alder
    March 8, 2009

    I listened to the debate. It seemed that Dennett’s response and most of the Q and A strayed from (what I took to be) the key issues. For instance, do we have a defeater for all of our beliefs given Naturalism and Evolution?(as Plantinga argues). Dennett mentions a function of the human brain that destroys faulty cognitive faculties (ones that produce false beliefs) but does such a function of the brain plausibly arise from naturalistic evolution? A full human brain has a hard enough time ascertaining truth, is there really a function of the brain that knows truth so well that it destroys faulty cognitive faculties? Perhaps. However, the existence of such a function seems much more likely on Theism than on Naturalism.

The site is currently under maintenance and will be back shortly. New comments have been disabled during this time, please check back soon.