SCENE: The castle of Pharyngula in the city of Science Blogs. Enter KING MYERS and attendants.
1ST MESSENGER:
My lord, a new cache of letters has arrived, declaiming threats against your royal person, offering up chants of prayer for your still-vexèd soul, and asserting with much hauteur that the Law of Entropy does the Darwinist belie.
MYERS:
Do aught of these ill-nocked epistles yield
A shaft whose point we have not brushed away
A thousand times, and myriad encore?
1ST MESSENGER:
I should judge not, my lord.
MYERS:
Then shall the brazier these old verses scan,
And sparks for glosses serve while theses light
The Bacchal revels of our midnight court.
By starshine shall we share their bosom warmth
While I hold forth upon the pair-rule gene
And cups are loft to ion-channel pores.
— Lady Hunter, to the fires with these remarks.
HUNTER:
Burn, pages, burn, and let your ashes mingle with your betters.
2ND MESSENGER:
My most gracious sovereign! I bring you news from the dungeons, where trolls and specimens most vile wait in durance for the mercy of your gracious Majesty.
MYERS:
What word from the cellars, good my herald?
2ND MESSENGER:
The ruffians, late apprehended in a comment thread, who railed against your person have with gasping pipes now sung the name of their employer. Gracious King, they did brawl for pay, and withal for the gold of your Grace's foe, the Marquis de Coiffure.
COUNT DI PIETRO:
Coiffure? I'll draw my poniard now, and through
With him who takes his pyrite-minted coin!
MYERS:
Peace, 'coz. He feeds on nothing but our fame.
You know we rule a kingdom of good sense;
He has himself expelled from our domain.
A noise at the door.
What subject craves an audience with us?
HUNTER:
It is the young man Stacey, gracious King,
Who has but lately pledged devotion liege
To your right puissant and most noble house.
MYERS:
Bid the vassal enter.
Enter STACEY.
So, lætus fey,
What brings you to our throne on Saturn's day?
STACEY:
Your Grace, my sovereign most dread, I come
With tidings borne here from that distant isle
That is the Duchy of the Blackford called,
Where sceptered children dream of being more
Than human when maturity they reach.
And more than salutations do I bring,
For on my conduct through Your goodly lands
Petitions have I gathered, writs which beg
The intercession of Your royal touch,
To benedict with bless of traffic count
The wretches who ignobly toil without.
MYERS:
We do sense a spirit magnanimine
Moving in ourself today. Read you, then,
The substance of these suits which importune
Our time. — But charge you, finish soon.
STACEY:
The tale, my valiant Lord, is swiftly told.
Before all else, Greg Downey does discourse
On "gender gaps" in math and of the lies
Which to exploit them have been told.
HUNTER:
Oft have we heard, indeed, of oafish men,
Pretenders to the throne of Academe,
Who having styled themselves "professor" like,
Profess their heads concerned with narrow tails
Of bell-shaped curves; but well in troth we've seen
Their gaze fixate upon the curvy tails
Of narrow shapely belles. Oh, epic fails!
STACEY:
Alas, 'tis so; innumerates are rife.
The Almost Adamant does speak of what
"Attention span" now means in our odd age.
And on the heels of that, Evolving Mind
Notes when by cover may a book be judged.
STACEY:
I traveled next into my native land,
Where physicists talk long and late of div
And grad and curl. The first I met did bend
My ear about the LHC, and then
I met a man who with lasers works.
MYERS:
Lasers do the factor cool possess.
Marry, on, and let the man be blessed.
STACEY:
And this petitioner does Steve Ballmer
Most cruelly mock and rip and shred.
MYERS:
In troth,
Well does he make his points, but think thou not
That his elitist bastard tongue is yet
An instrument untrained? No matter; on!
STACEY:
Three worthies I do note, who write of that
Most vital practice and inquiry,
That which as medicine we call; first John
And Pal and then does Annie speak.
MYERS:
All well,
Yet in all this sweep of grand ideal
What of the matters which the moment does
Contest? Cannot we draw a lesson from
The heat and wild of politic today?
STACEY:
Your Grace, Cobalt and Ames do to that end
Their voices do donate. And as Cobalt
Speaks of the walls authority can build
Within the heart to keep the pulse pristine
Against subversion by a little thing
As truth, so does Mike O'Risal take on
The "colleges" which work against the mind,
And teach not fact but Fundamental faith.
MYERS:
The character our subjects do evince
Does please us well.
STACEY:
Indeed, my lord, and but
A single suit remains. The authors of
10,000 Birds present the wonders of —
MYERS:
Of fowl which are but maladapted fish!
Of chromatophores they all nothing have,
Nor ink nor tentacles to weaklings grab.
STACEY:
Perhaps I do mistake your meaning quite,
My gracious Lord, but do you mean to say —
MYERS:
Shall I be plain? I wish the bustards dead.
And I would have it suddenly performed.
Who then is next to bootless plead our touch
Before our royal court and carnival?
HUNTER:
The date is set, good king, for one month's time.
MYERS:
We hope that their most humble suits do please
Us better than this basal nest of fleas.

![[sex and science]](http://www.sunclipse.org/downloads/sexandscience3.png)




Comments
A cavalcade of brilliance! Prithee continue these amusements, that we commonfolk may indulge in merriments endless and fine.
"Marquis de Coiffure." Best. Spitting. Fruit. Punch. Out. of. Nose. Ever.
Posted by: JoshS | August 30, 2008 5:24 PM
Verily, sir, thy rapier wit hath pierced the haughty squid!
'Tis the epitome of excellence. Shall I hear a rousing chorus in honour of our bonnie Captain?
HUZZAH! HUZZAH! HUZZAH!
Posted by: Dana Hunter | August 30, 2008 5:41 PM
Thanks. I thought of the "Marquis" bit, and all the rest just seemed to follow logically after.
Posted by: Blake Stacey | August 30, 2008 5:45 PM
This grandiloquent knave doth truly blog sooth. Brilliant!
Posted by: Mike | August 30, 2008 6:20 PM
Yep, yep. Shore is purdy talk. Yep. Yep.
Posted by: Chris Crawford | August 30, 2008 7:29 PM
Marquis de Coiffure
Superb.
And congratulations, Dr. Dr. Blackford!
Posted by: SC | August 30, 2008 7:30 PM
From tht ghosties and the ghoulies and things that go bump in the night, dear reason protect us
Posted by: varlo | August 30, 2008 7:31 PM
The Vermin only teaze and pinch Their Foes superior by an Inch. So Nat'ralists observe, an IDer Hath smaller IDers that on him pray, And these have smaller IDers to bite 'em, And so proceed ad infinitum. [Apologies to Swift]
Posted by: John S. Wilkins | August 30, 2008 9:47 PM
MOAR!!!!
Posted by: PalMD | August 30, 2008 10:55 PM
This is great!
Posted by: Peacefully Evyl | August 30, 2008 11:25 PM
Blake,
Speaking as an elitist actor who has been called a bastard from time to time, this is excellent. But tell the truth - you're really Christopher Marlowe, aren't you?
Posted by: Randy | August 30, 2008 11:30 PM
It's true. I was under investigation for atheism and knew I would have to report to the Star Chamber, so I faked my own death in a bar-room brawl — a knife-fight after a backgammon game which supposedly erupted during an argument over the bill, to be precise.
To paraphrase Mark Twain, this blog is written either by Blake Stacey or by somebody using his name.
Posted by: Blake Stacey | August 31, 2008 1:08 AM
Hi Blake,
Great job with the carnival. I always enjoy the diversity of this one.
I'm going to just jump in and ask a question. Maybe it's completely obvious, in which case it shouldn't be hard to set me straight.
I was just reading a blog talking about the LHC, and it was saying that part of what was being looked for was evidence for large extra dimension models - it pointed at this wikipedia page, which says:
"In models of large extra dimensions the fundamental scale is much lower than the Planck. This occurs because the power law of gravity changes. For example, when there are two extra dimensions of size d, the power law of gravity is 1/r^4 for objects with r << d and 1/r^2 for objects with r >> d. If we want the Planck scale to be equal to the next accelerator energy (1 TeV), we should take d approximately 1mm. "
Now I've had no physics since high school so I am speaking from a position of almost complete ignorance, but would it be possible that up the high end (getting d up toward 1mm) to rule out such a change in gravity with distance using non-particle means, by measuring say deformation in a crystal lattice (well, the effects of it on say conductivity or vibration frequency or some x-ray crystallography pattern or effect on interference patterns in a laser diffraction experiment or whatever else there is that might be affected by some small deformation in a lattice).
Obviously, even with the densest materials available on earth, the gravitational effects would be miniscule since you can only get so much material within 1 mm, and G is incredibly small, but given the ability these days to design experiments orders of magnitude more sensitive than was used to measure G in the first place, I really wonder if some tabletop experiment could not beat out the LHC up toward the mm scale by fairly direct measurement. (I guess its possible I am not putting enough < in << - I guess I am assuming hundred microns or more, but if << really means much nearer to micron distances or even smaller, I think I can answer my question myself.
Posted by: efrique | August 31, 2008 2:05 AM
I'm the guy who sees the carnival and runs right home to put on his clown suit and try to catch up.
Lovers of ye olde English, I invite you to read about the good old days, when espionage was done through the bungholes of beer kegs.
http://confluencecity.blogspot.com/2008/08/of-espionage-and-bungholes.html
It's all true.
Thanks for a great read!
"Lasers doth the factor cool possess"!
Posted by: Chris King | August 31, 2008 8:20 AM
The most recent experiment of which I am aware pretty much excluded deviations from Newtonian gravity at distances down to 10 microns. I don't think you could pack enough mass into a layer of crystal lattice that thick.
Posted by: Blake Stacey | August 31, 2008 11:16 AM
Awesome! Proud to be included.
Posted by: Cobalt | August 31, 2008 12:52 PM
Ah-ha! You thought you were pretty slick, Marlowe, but CSI: Deptford tumbled your game.
Posted by: Randy | August 31, 2008 4:14 PM
I guess it's not very elitist of me to not realize I had been included until now. Thanks Blake (or whoever got me in here)!
Posted by: Tyler DiPietro | August 31, 2008 8:21 PM
Forsooth! the man bespeak himself a masterpiece of verbiage sublime! i'faith he hast read much of the bard, and of poets of note.
Posted by: DLC | August 31, 2008 10:11 PM
Bravo!
Posted by: Kelly Gorski | September 3, 2008 9:49 AM
My dear Sir Stacey, would you care to assist me in my inspection of this butt of malmsey?
Posted by: Joshua | September 3, 2008 4:54 PM
OMG THEREZ A BODY IN HEER!
First, Skeptics in the Pub became an impromptu Richard III performance. Now, I'm bringing the goodness to ScienceBlogs!
Posted by: Blake Stacey | September 3, 2008 5:10 PM
Wow, Blake! I missed the Carnival (busy with family stuff, no access) and followed your link from His Majesty's blog today.
Lovely work. You have that "factor cool" thing happening, too!
Posted by: Leigh Williams | September 19, 2008 5:57 AM