Given all the fun that everyone had recently with the Southern sea lion skull, I thought you'd all enjoy the chance to have a go with another specimen. This one's a lot easier, no prizes for getting it right. Let battle commence!
PS - yesterday's artice on sea lions was ver 2's 100th entry - wahey!

Darren Naish is a science writer, technical editor and palaeozoologist (affiliated with the University of Portsmouth, UK) who mostly works on Cretaceous dinosaurs and pterosaurs. He also studies such things as the 




Comments
Umm... A baboon? or a mandril (sorry, don't know the exact word in English for Mandrillus. That blue-faced ape). It's a impressive predatory face!
Posted by: Luis Daniel | June 22, 2007 6:32 AM
This is definitely a baboon.
Posted by: nemo ramjet | June 22, 2007 6:36 AM
I'm going to guess a male Chacma Baboon.
Posted by: Cameron | June 22, 2007 6:57 AM
Male baboon? Which Papio species I'm not too sure.
Posted by: Hai~Ren | June 22, 2007 7:02 AM
Forward facing eyes in a mammal=primate. Was gona say gorilla but the snout is to long. So baboon? hmm banana, squashed banana...
Posted by: Neil | June 22, 2007 7:31 AM
baboon-type thing, definitely. Mandrill? Gelada?
Posted by: ross | June 22, 2007 7:42 AM
I know what it is, it´s the skull of this mummified sea monster: http://www.neatorama.com/images/2006-06/mummified-sea-monster.jpg ...
Well, it is a skull of some kind of baboon, perhaps a chacma baboon, but I´m not 100% sure about this.
Those baboon skulls are really impressive, I think they are among the most "monstrous" skulls of all modern mammals.
Posted by: Sordes | June 22, 2007 7:49 AM
It's a baboon skull but I'm not sure of the species. Hmm, hamadryas or olive? I guess I'll think on it.
Posted by: Diego | June 22, 2007 7:59 AM
a baboon?
Posted by: KS | June 22, 2007 8:20 AM
I would not have guessed the sea lion although it was very clear to me that it was a mammal.
But this looks looks very much like a Baboon (Papio) to me.
Posted by: Lars | June 22, 2007 8:30 AM
baboon?
Posted by: tai haku | June 22, 2007 8:35 AM
Adult male baboon/mandrill
Posted by: Dave Hughes | June 22, 2007 8:55 AM
An old male baboon. I would say savanna baboon, or chacma baboon if this is indeed a full species and not just a subspecies of the savanna baboon. The skull of a male hamadryas has a ridge above the braincase, wich is lacking here, the gelada has a much deeper mandible - probably because of its granivorous diet - and the mandrill has a much more pronounced "stop" - if I am allowed to use this canine term when referring to a primate - between the snout and the forehead. This leaves the chacma baboon.
Posted by: johannes | June 22, 2007 9:31 AM
forward eyes, long jaw, big teef...funny, even as a non biologist I was going to say baboon...
Posted by: Tengu | June 22, 2007 9:42 AM
Mandrill. Male. Adult. (And not geriatric like the last specimen).
Posted by: chris wemmer | June 22, 2007 10:59 AM
Not an expert on skulls, (or much else for that matter), but I'll throw my tuppence worth into the ring. A Chacma baboon........canines look too short for a mandrill.
Posted by: Shaun Stevens | June 22, 2007 10:59 AM
Too late for this skulduggery :) Anyhow that looks like Papio ursinus. P. sphinx males seem to have more curved and longer canines. Geladas have a "Homo erectus" like ridge on the brow- so this is definitely not that. Papio show the groove in their canines (as seen in this specimen) that apparently was mistaken in a fossil mammal Bisonalveus to be a poison delivering groove. A good counter example from Papio.
Posted by: Rajita | June 22, 2007 11:21 AM
Seeing as it looks almost exactly like this, I'm going to agree with Rajita: Papio ursinus.
Posted by: Keesey | June 22, 2007 11:50 AM
Baboon - not mandrill (lacks the bony flanges down the side of the nostrils) nor gelada (lacks the heavy brow ridge) - the overall shape looks a little more like the skulls of southern baboons (Chacma or Yellow) rather than northern (Hamadryas, Guinea etc)- so I think it's probably a male Chacma baboon or yellow baboon.
Posted by: mark lees | June 22, 2007 12:03 PM
Baboon, not mandrill or gelada.
Posted by: Steve Bodio | June 22, 2007 12:05 PM
This may be a bit anticlimactic, but I think it's a baboon. ;-)
Posted by: Placozoan | June 22, 2007 3:20 PM
I am somewhat surprised at the ideas given here that the skulls if from a babboon. Its synapsid features show that it is a from the Synapsida but its dentition features and tremendous cranial ridges show that it is of the Permian gorgonopsian group. It is a shame that they is no scale in the picture becuase this is making the skull look small, it must really be large and this would show its gorgon identity best. I have done a big study of these animals and know this.
Posted by: Mwaka Unguti | June 22, 2007 4:10 PM
Yeah, I'll go with the crowd and say it's a baboon. I'll even go out on a limb (cause I ain't no expert) and say it's a yellow baboon, papio cynocephalus. From the little I know P. ursinus has smaller canines then the critter shown above.
Posted by: Susan | June 22, 2007 6:41 PM
Well, I at least know a baboon skull when I see one. I was going to guess a mandrill, but I am convinced by the arguments of those above who think it is a chacma. Also, now I seem to be recalling that the cheekbones of a mandrill flare out really weirdly (but I may be mistaken).
A gorgonopsid? I think you are being tricked by the perspective or something -- not with the close-together, forward-facing eyes. Although if you block out the farther eye and the farther half of the nasal region, and pretend that you are looking at a straight lateral view, it does look a little like a gorgon, weirdly. But gorgons didn't have molars, did they?
Posted by: Stevo Darkly | June 23, 2007 12:01 AM
It would also be a sensation to have a subfossil skull of a gorgonopsid...
Posted by: Sordes | June 23, 2007 6:45 AM
Papio ursinus
Posted by: Ville Sinkkonen | June 23, 2007 8:23 AM
No way this is a gorgonopsian. Forward-facing eyes; fused nostrils; just two incisors per jaw quarter; huge mammalian postcanines; somewhat short canines that are round in cross-section; a completely bloated braincase; no postdentary bones or angular process; no prefrontal, postfrontal, or postorbital (the postorbital bar consists entirely of the frontal and the jugal); and the lateral ridges on the snout are unexpected for a gorgonopsian, too. With that tooth formula it must be a catarrhine.
Last but not least, the skull does not look fossil, does it?
Posted by: David Marjanović | June 23, 2007 10:50 AM
Stevo, I think that Mwaka must be deliberately either making a joke or trying to lead people off the consensus path of baboon with a red herring (or red gorgonopsid as the case may be).
Posted by: Diego | June 23, 2007 12:07 PM
Although everyone has already said this, when I first saw it, I immediately knew that it was a papionid primate. (If that is even a word) I love the canines! I also love the cranium of a Chinese water deer...nice canines also. Anyway, an old male since the sutures are obliterated.
Posted by: Jason Fox | June 23, 2007 1:35 PM
Uruk-Hai?
Posted by: John H | June 24, 2007 1:22 AM
I have to ask, when did baboon/drill muzzles slope like that? Aren't there other monkeys with muzzles, ones that slope?
Posted by: Alan Kellogg | June 24, 2007 4:41 AM
Which sutures are obliterated? I see lots of sutures all over the place.
Posted by: David Marjanović | June 24, 2007 8:09 PM
I'm putting my money down on a Theropithecus gelada, a Gelada Baboon.
Posted by: Mishal | June 25, 2007 12:10 AM
I think it's a baboon, but I can't narrow down the species.
Posted by: Emile | June 25, 2007 5:23 AM
The skulls of geladas look very different from this skull. This is a comparably typical baboon skull, but those of geladas have a much shorter muzzle, large eye-brows and are much more robust overall.
Posted by: Sordes | June 25, 2007 6:15 AM
for the ridges on snout sides....perhaps a Sulawesi baboon?(not remember the scientific name)
Posted by: Edgar | June 26, 2007 4:10 PM
> for the ridges on snout sides....perhaps a Sulawesi baboon?(not > remember the scientific name)
Edgar,
what you mean is probably the Celebes Crested Macaque (Macaca nigra).
It is a stout, sizeable animal as far as macaques go, but not a true baboon, at least not in the traditional meaning of that term.
Posted by: johannes | June 27, 2007 11:44 AM
Thanks Johannes, i mean just this species, and refer to the baboon-like snout it had(and looks pretty like a baboon)
Posted by: Edgar | July 5, 2007 8:03 PM
Sea Mammal or Fish
Posted by: ed | December 24, 2007 12:31 PM
I think it's Pongo pygmageus ? if you not collection mammalian skull from Indonesian Island please contact me but not appendix mammalian skull.
Posted by: Kris | January 14, 2008 1:05 PM
I think it's Pongo pygmageus ? if you want collection mammalian skull from Indonesian Island please contact me but not appendix mammalian skull.
Posted by: Kris | January 14, 2008 1:09 PM