Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Tetrapod Zoology

Amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals - living and extinct

Profile

Naish-pterosaur-model-150-px.jpg Darren Naish is a science writer, technical editor and palaeozoologist (affiliated with the University of Portsmouth, UK) who mostly works on Cretaceous dinosaurs and pterosaurs. He also studies such things as the swimming abilities of giraffes and fossil marine reptiles. An avid interest in modern wildlife and conservation has resulted in many adventures in lizard-chasing, bird-watching and litter-collecting. I've been blogging since 2006 and a compilation of early Tet Zoo articles is now available in book form as Tetrapod Zoology Book One. Additional recent books include The Great Dinosaur Discoveries and Dinosaurs Life Size. For more biographical info go here. I can be contacted intermittently at eotyrannus (at) gmail dot com. PLEASE NOTE: I am now completely unable to keep up with email correspondence. I do my best to respond to all queries and requests, but please don't be offended if I fail to reply. I blog from and about conferences - please contact me for more info. Follow me on twitter: @TetZoo.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Tetrapod Zoology backstory

The ones I participate in

Mostly on extant tetrapods

Mostly Cenozoic

Mostly Mesozoic

Palaeozoic

Cryptozoology

Speculative Zoology

Toys and models

Not easily categorised

Invaluable resources

« That most famous of yeti tracks | Main | Raven, the claw-handed bird, last of the phorusrhacids »

Chicken chicken chicken

Category: frivolous nonsense
Posted on: June 17, 2008 6:18 PM, by Darren Naish

Shame, shame, shame, oh shame on me. I saw the following on John Conway's Philosophica Neopalaeontographica and have become so obsessed with it that, here I am, stealing it. It's not, even, really about tetrapods...

... and the accompanying paper (available as a free pdf) is available here. As John says, the word chicken will never seem the same again. Hang around a bit longer, phorusrhacids next... again...

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Humanities & Social Science

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/74309

Comments

1

The paper, is it peer reviewed?

Posted by: Man of the sloth | June 17, 2008 7:08 PM

2

Chicken chicken chicken Chicken chicken chickens? Chicken chicken "chicken" chicken. Chicken! Chicken chicken chicken. C. chicken chicken chicken. Chicken chicken chicken chicken Chickens Chicken. ...Chicken?

Posted by: Zach Miller | June 17, 2008 7:53 PM

3

nice flow charts!

Posted by: onleyone | June 17, 2008 8:29 PM

4

Well, as we used to say back in the early days of Chomskyan generative grammar (bliss was it to be alive in that dawn, and to be young was very heaven!),
"Oysters oysters oysters eat eat eat."

Posted by: Allen Hazen | June 17, 2008 8:56 PM

5

Since when have chickens not been tetrapods?

Posted by: John S. Wilkins | June 17, 2008 9:37 PM

6

John: You're new here, aren't you? Chickens have been tetrapods only since zoologists lost their counting skills.

Posted by: Nathan Myers | June 17, 2008 9:51 PM

7

ZOMGZ =gasp= ROFL =coff= MAO =snort= I can't =wheeze= stand it! Gimme some =choke= oxygen!

=turns blue, passes out=

She's not breathing! I can't find a pulse! Somebody call 911!

=CPR=

.......must.... not..... go...... towards..... the........ chicken....

=more CPR=

I'm still not getting a pulse! Gimme the paddles! CLEAR!

=ZAP=

noooo....... must.... not..... go...... towards..... the........ fried..... chicken....

Again! Crank it up to 300! CLEAR!

=ZAP=

Oh hi, can I have a side of mashed potatoes and gravy and some cole slaw with that? Oh, and make that chicken extra crispy.

I've seen the paper, but never heard the presentation. How did he do that with a straight face? I loved the comment from the guy in the audience, ca.2:30 - "What about the eggs?"

Posted by: themadlolscientist | June 18, 2008 12:20 AM

8

Badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger mushroom mushroom.

Posted by: Dave Godfrey | June 18, 2008 8:16 AM

9

beaver beaver beaver beaver beaver beaver beaver beaver beaver beaver beaver beaver beaver beaver beaver beaver
(very rude where I come from).

Posted by: dlactin | June 18, 2008 8:28 AM

10

snake a snake, oh it's a snake

Posted by: Darren Naish | June 18, 2008 8:31 AM

11

Can't watch the video because I'm at work. Is this anything like "Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo."?

Either way, the word "chicken" has lost all meaning for me.

Posted by: sublunary | June 18, 2008 9:06 AM

12

Jenny absolutely insists that it's "snake, snake, african snake". She is so wrong.

Posted by: John Conway | June 18, 2008 9:34 AM

13

Tell Jenny she's wrong, but we still love her. The proof.

Posted by: Darren Naish | June 18, 2008 9:48 AM

14

Oh, great: my SVP talk is now scooped!! Better withdraw it...

Posted by: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. | June 18, 2008 1:08 PM

15

Funding well spent!

BTW badgers is really found here in all its true flashy glory:
http://www.weebls-stuff.com/toons/badgers/

Posted by: Neil | June 18, 2008 1:46 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.