Ground hornbills - or bucorvids - have been Tet Zoo mainstays since the early days of 2006. However, the only species that I ever feature is the Southern ground hornbill Bucorvus leadbeateri (sometimes incorrectly referred to by one of its junior synonyms, B. cafer). It's easily recognisable for its red facial skin and low casque.
To bring balance, here's the other species: the Abyssinian or Northern ground hornbill B. abyssinicus (this one photographed at Dublin Zoo). In contrast to its close relative, it has a much taller casque, and blue facial skin. Its throat pouch is blue in females but red in males.
Alas, poor old bucorvids: they so often get mentioned these days as mere azhdarchid analogues.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The photo of the Northern ground hornbill Bucorvus abyssinicus featured here yesterday was posted entirely on a whim. And I figured that I didn't need to say much about the species, nor about ground hornbills in general, given that they've been discussed at length on Tet Zoo before. But then I…
More from the bird book. For the back-story, see the previous owls article.
Hornbills are among the most distinctive and spectacular of Old World tropical birds. Often flaunting bright colours and sometimes reaching huge sizes (the largest species have wingspans of 1.8 m), they're well known for…
As per bloody usual, I'm going to struggle to get a 'proper' post finished today, so yet again I'll have to settle for posting something short and sweet (PS - I failed miserably). Who am I kidding anyway - 95% of the bloggers in the blogosphere routinely produce articles that are shorter than my '…
Observant readers might have noticed the several recent references to 'big news in a big journal' coming soon, or on 'how a Tet Zoo article evolved into a peer-reviewed technical publication'. Yes, not all of Tet Zoo is idle nonsense written for fun; at least some of it results in actual peer-…
"it has a much taller casque, and blue facial skin"
Wow, that's a coincidence. So does this.
Darren:
This is probably another case of 'Serengeti bias'. If B. abyssinicus lived in the major national parks of South Africa, Tanzania, or southern Kenya - as B. leadbeateri does - it would be much more often featured in wildlife documentaries and the like.
Bucorvus is one of my favorite genera. But I thought you were trying to cut down on theropod posts.
Only those on Mesozoic theropods.
YES!!!! More dinosaurs!!!!! (When I said that I couldn't get enough dinosaurs, I wasn't just referring to the Mesozoic ones) :-)
Sorry, I clicked "post" too soon, i meant to add this:
Will some kind soul PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE answer my question? It's comment 46 on the Lysorophians and aistopods article. It's really pretty important. I've already begged, but no one on the previous post would take just a moment to answer it. PLEASE. Thank you.
Sorry, I just noticed that David Marjanovic did, indeed, adress my question on the previous post, but he couldn't help out. Thanks anyway, David. If anybody can, I'd greatly apprectiate it. (By the way, I'm putting this here because I figured that since it's the latest article, it'll get more traffic.)
I like the birds and non-avian theropods. More posts is cool.
As long as we're suggesting topics to Darren, I would love to see a discussion of the paper by Carbone et al. (2007?; if there hasn't already been one) on the energetics of mammalian carnivory limiting upper size- and the implication that a 5 ton theropod had the same total metabolic rate as a 1 ton polar bear.
Questions: do we really know ~1000 kg is the upper limit for past predators? Megistotherium and Andrewsarchus- isn't there some suggestion they were larger (or no?)
Do we believe this paper as constraining the metabolism of large theropods?
What about the exceptions-giant pinnipeds and average whales? Why are they exceptions- and are the non-avian theropods likewise exceptions to this theory, given prey size (other ideas?)
Two observations/questions: did dinosaurs have had indeterminate growth, like crocodiles- and how does this relate to metabolic rate/body size?
Largest whales suggested to live incredibly long, like 200 years maybe. How does this relate to their gigantism and sauropod/theropod gigantism, whom may have had indeterminate growth, at least for sauropods?
Also, sauropods didn't chew (thanks Matt Wiedel.)
Too many questions, I know, sorry
So, uh, are bucorvids related to...*gulp*...corvids?
Michael (comment 6): I would recommend...
Frey, E. 1988. Anatomie des Korperstammes von Alligator mississippiensis Daudin. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie A (Biologie) 424, 1-106.
... though this is hardly easy to obtain, so I doubt it'll help much. We're all happy to help with queries (we = myself and the knowledgeable regular readers), but please remember that this a blog, not a Q & A site. Are you aware of Ask A Biologist? (if not, see sidebar: it's in 'The ones I participate in').
You asked about my Heptasteornis paper. I've already emailed you a pdf.
Zach (comment 9): bucorvids are hornbills, and hornbills are close relatives of hoopoes and wood-hoopoes. More details... tomorrow!
As for chiropter's comment (no. 8).. I'll leave that for someone else! :)
ö.
Not me, I hope -- I haven't read the paper, and have no time to hunt it down or read it now.
Ask a Biologist? Was not aware of such a thing - sounds cool. Thank you so much, Darren!
Thank you so much for the PDF! BTW, you'll get an email about the crocodilian musculature thing - please ignore it Keep up the good work, Darren!
I always enjoy posts about hornbills, thanks Darren. About 11 years ago I went to spend a couple of weeks with a friend in the Peace Corps, in a village in northern Senegal. The hornbills living in the millet fields were some fantastic birds, even if they were the smaller, ground-nesting types.
I've always thought hornbills would make for an aewsome study of how rhamphothecae are structured, although it seems like very few people in general care much about rhamphothecae, aside from Dominique Homberger. I can see a future project developing....
Darren- meh, don't blame you. But I am a little surprised, I kind of thought this might have been brought up when the paper first came out, it was pretty well publicized...here it is btw:
http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050022
(open access)
I love ground hornbill-- it makes an excellent burger. Of course the best kind of chuck is ground squirrel.
Diego: Not funny - actually rather offensive to the animal lovers (hint hint) that read this blog.
4:
In that case, as a theropod neontologist I applaud your efforts.
9:
Yes, in that they're both birds, and both neoavians, and both belong to the "Land Bird" clade. More than that, no. Corvids belong to the order Passeriformes, while bucorvids belong to the order Bucerotiformes. They're a little closer to corvids than Nycticorax and Phalacrocorax are to Corax, though.
Michael E., you might try contacting either 'Dino' Frey in Germany (the author Darren cited), or his former student Steve Salisbury at the Uni of Queensland (Brisbane, Australia). These are places outside Nortn America, but Google still works there. ;)
Thank you, John! I appreciate the tip.
Michael: I too consider myself an animal lover, but I also love puns to the point that they are my Achilles' heel. When the two meet, something has to give, and usually that something is 'good taste'. ;)
Looking at it again, I guess "ground hornbill" is kinda "punny" ;-)
Diego: I will never be able to look at a ground squirrel quite the same way again.
What's funny is that was the bird "Zazu" from The Lion King was based on. Barely looks anything alike.
No, Zazu is meant to be a Red-billed hornbill Tockus erythrorhynchus. I know these things.
That is odd because the only large ground hornbill's I have worked with are the Abs.